Detection of bronchopulmonary dysplasia in infants and prediction of school-age lung function from tidal breathing data using recurrent neural networks.

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q3 BIOPHYSICS
Abdessamad Falhi, Malena Gwerder, Céline Rüttimann, Urs Frey, Edgar Delgado-Eckert
{"title":"Detection of bronchopulmonary dysplasia in infants and prediction of school-age lung function from tidal breathing data using recurrent neural networks.","authors":"Abdessamad Falhi, Malena Gwerder, Céline Rüttimann, Urs Frey, Edgar Delgado-Eckert","doi":"10.1088/1361-6579/ae85b1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><i>Objective.</i>To test whether machine learning (ML) models trained on tidal breathing flow time series can discriminate between individuals with and without respiratory disease and predict lung function indices obtained from conventional pulmonary function testing.<i>Background.</i>accurate assessment of respiratory function in infants and young children is challenging because conventional pulmonary function testing requires sophisticated equipment and/or active patient cooperation. Tidal breathing measurements, in contrast, can be obtained non-invasively with little or no patient cooperation and at low cost, yet their clinical utility has been limited. We hypothesized that sufficiently long tidal breathing flow time series contain clinically relevant information that can be extracted using a recurrent neural network known as a long short-term memory (LSTM) network.<i>Approach.</i>We evaluated LSTM models in two scenarios within the Basel-Bern Infant Lung Development cohort. First, we assessed the ability of a model trained on flow and derived volume time series to detect bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) in 329 infants. Second, we examined whether a model trained on tidal breathing flow alone could predict forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV<sub>1</sub>) in 135 school-age children. Signals were filtered and normalized prior to model training, and performance was evaluated on held-out test datasets.<i>Main results.</i>For BPD detection, the model achieved 97.0% accuracy, 100% specificity, 91.7% sensitivity, 100% precision, and an F1-score of 95.7%. For FEV<sub>1</sub>prediction, Bland-Altman analysis showed a mean bias of -0.009 l (95% CI -0.091-0.074), with limits of agreement of -0.416 l and 0.399 l. The mean relative prediction error was 13.7%.<i>Significance.</i>These findings demonstrate that temporal patterns in tidal breathing flow signals contain diagnostically and functionally relevant information. ML applied to tidal breathing measurements may provide a low-burden, minimal-cooperation approach for early respiratory disease detection and functional assessment across early life stages.</p>","PeriodicalId":20047,"journal":{"name":"Physiological measurement","volume":"47 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physiological measurement","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6579/ae85b1","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective.To test whether machine learning (ML) models trained on tidal breathing flow time series can discriminate between individuals with and without respiratory disease and predict lung function indices obtained from conventional pulmonary function testing.Background.accurate assessment of respiratory function in infants and young children is challenging because conventional pulmonary function testing requires sophisticated equipment and/or active patient cooperation. Tidal breathing measurements, in contrast, can be obtained non-invasively with little or no patient cooperation and at low cost, yet their clinical utility has been limited. We hypothesized that sufficiently long tidal breathing flow time series contain clinically relevant information that can be extracted using a recurrent neural network known as a long short-term memory (LSTM) network.Approach.We evaluated LSTM models in two scenarios within the Basel-Bern Infant Lung Development cohort. First, we assessed the ability of a model trained on flow and derived volume time series to detect bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) in 329 infants. Second, we examined whether a model trained on tidal breathing flow alone could predict forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) in 135 school-age children. Signals were filtered and normalized prior to model training, and performance was evaluated on held-out test datasets.Main results.For BPD detection, the model achieved 97.0% accuracy, 100% specificity, 91.7% sensitivity, 100% precision, and an F1-score of 95.7%. For FEV1prediction, Bland-Altman analysis showed a mean bias of -0.009 l (95% CI -0.091-0.074), with limits of agreement of -0.416 l and 0.399 l. The mean relative prediction error was 13.7%.Significance.These findings demonstrate that temporal patterns in tidal breathing flow signals contain diagnostically and functionally relevant information. ML applied to tidal breathing measurements may provide a low-burden, minimal-cooperation approach for early respiratory disease detection and functional assessment across early life stages.

利用递归神经网络从潮汐呼吸数据检测婴幼儿支气管肺发育不良及预测学龄肺功能。
目标。研究背景:准确评估婴幼儿呼吸功能是一项具有挑战性的工作,因为传统的肺功能检测需要复杂的设备和/或患者的积极配合。相比之下,潮汐呼吸测量可以在很少或没有患者合作的情况下以低成本获得无创呼吸,但其临床应用受到限制。我们假设足够长的潮汐呼吸流时间序列包含临床相关信息,可以使用称为长短期记忆(LSTM)网络的循环神经网络提取。方法。我们在巴塞尔-伯尔尼婴儿肺部发育队列的两种情况下评估LSTM模型。首先,我们评估了一个基于流量和导出的体积时间序列训练的模型检测329名婴儿支气管肺发育不良(BPD)的能力。其次,我们检查了仅训练潮汐呼吸流量的模型是否可以预测135名学龄儿童的一秒钟用力呼气量(FEV1)。在模型训练之前,对信号进行过滤和归一化,并在测试数据集上评估性能。主要的结果。对于BPD检测,该模型准确率为97.0%,特异性为100%,灵敏度为91.7%,精确度为100%,f1评分为95.7%。对于fev1预测,Bland-Altman分析显示平均偏差为-0.009 l (95% CI -0.091 ~ 0.074),一致性限为-0.416 l和0.399 l,平均相对预测误差为13.7%。这些发现表明潮汐呼吸流信号的时间模式包含诊断和功能相关信息。ML应用于潮汐呼吸测量可以为早期呼吸疾病检测和早期生命阶段的功能评估提供低负担、最小合作的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Physiological measurement
Physiological measurement 生物-工程:生物医学
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
9.40%
发文量
124
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Physiological Measurement publishes papers about the quantitative assessment and visualization of physiological function in clinical research and practice, with an emphasis on the development of new methods of measurement and their validation. Papers are published on topics including: applied physiology in illness and health electrical bioimpedance, optical and acoustic measurement techniques advanced methods of time series and other data analysis biomedical and clinical engineering in-patient and ambulatory monitoring point-of-care technologies novel clinical measurements of cardiovascular, neurological, and musculoskeletal systems. measurements in molecular, cellular and organ physiology and electrophysiology physiological modeling and simulation novel biomedical sensors, instruments, devices and systems measurement standards and guidelines.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书