Safety and Efficacy of Oral Ferric Maltol and Ferrous Sulfate for Iron Deficiency Anemia in Infants, Children and Adolescents: A Multicenter Randomized Trial.

IF 3.7 3区 医学 Q1 PEDIATRICS
Pediatric Drugs Pub Date : 2026-09-01 Epub Date: 2026-07-15 DOI:10.1007/s40272-026-00753-6
David Gass, Andrew Freiberg, Marcus K H Auth, Richard K Russell
{"title":"Safety and Efficacy of Oral Ferric Maltol and Ferrous Sulfate for Iron Deficiency Anemia in Infants, Children and Adolescents: A Multicenter Randomized Trial.","authors":"David Gass, Andrew Freiberg, Marcus K H Auth, Richard K Russell","doi":"10.1007/s40272-026-00753-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This phase 3, multicenter, randomized, open-label study (NCT05126901) compared oral ferric maltol with ferrous sulfate, across 23 sites in the US and the UK, evaluating the safety, efficacy, pharmacokinetics, tolerability, and palatability of age-specific doses in infants, children and, adolescents with iron deficiency anemia (IDA).</p><p><strong>Patient and methods: </strong>In a 12-week study, a total of 61 children/adolescents aged 2-17 years (median age 14 years; 45 female patients [73.8%] and 16 male patients [26.2%]) with IDA were randomized to ferric maltol or ferrous sulfate, plus 4 infants aged 1 month to < 2 years (median age 12 months; 3 female patients [75%] and 1 male patient [25%]) were assigned to ferric maltol (open label arm). Ferric maltol dosing was age-dependent (0.6 mg/kg/dose twice a day [BID] for infants; 15 mg BID for 2-11 years; 30 mg BID for 12-17 years), while ferrous sulfate dosing was weight-based (3 mg/kg BID). Safety, efficacy (Hemoglobin [Hb], serum iron, transferrin saturation [TSAT], ferritin), PK, and palatability were assessed. Coprimary end points were Hb changes from baseline and safety, including gastrointestinal tolerability at week 12.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A prespecified interim analysis of the primary end point (change in Hb from baseline to week 12) was conducted after 32 ferric maltol patients completed treatment. As the change was statistically significant (p < 0.0001), recruitment was stopped. The interim analysis used a Pocock spending function with a 3.45% two-sided confidence interval (CI). Both the randomized ferric maltol and ferrous sulfate groups showed meaningful increases in Hb versus baseline (descriptive increases of 1.25 and 1.15 g/dL, respectively). Post hoc analyses confirmed that these changes from baseline were statistically significant (p < 0.0001). Ferric maltol increased Hb by a mean of 1.77 g/dL in the assigned infant group over 12 weeks. Similarly, by week 12, both treatments increased serum iron and TSAT (p < 0.02), ferric maltol showed higher peak iron, and ferritin rose more with ferrous sulfate. Adverse events were mild/moderate and similar in frequency between the two treatment groups (29% ferric maltol, 30% ferrous sulfate), and adverse reactions deemed as at least possibly related to treatment were more common with ferrous sulfate. Among children aged 6-17 years, ferric maltol was rated as tasting OK, Good, or Very Good more frequently than ferrous sulfate at two time points. On day 1, 79.3% of patients receiving ferric maltol reported OK, Good, or Very Good taste, compared with 50.0% receiving ferrous sulfate (OR 0.26, 95% CI 0.07-0.97; p = 0.027). By day 28, this difference persisted (75.0% versus 45.8%), favoring ferric maltol (OR 0.28, 95% CI 0.07-1.05; p = 0.046). The significant results for taste were replicated for smell; ferric maltol had significantly better smell ratings than ferrous sulfate on days 1 and 28 (p ≤ 0.003).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Ferric maltol significantly improved Hb levels and iron storage within 12 weeks in children aged 1 month and above, offering potentially better tolerability and palatability compared with ferrous sulfate in children and adolescents.</p>","PeriodicalId":19955,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric Drugs","volume":" ","pages":"531-545"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric Drugs","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40272-026-00753-6","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/7/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: This phase 3, multicenter, randomized, open-label study (NCT05126901) compared oral ferric maltol with ferrous sulfate, across 23 sites in the US and the UK, evaluating the safety, efficacy, pharmacokinetics, tolerability, and palatability of age-specific doses in infants, children and, adolescents with iron deficiency anemia (IDA).

Patient and methods: In a 12-week study, a total of 61 children/adolescents aged 2-17 years (median age 14 years; 45 female patients [73.8%] and 16 male patients [26.2%]) with IDA were randomized to ferric maltol or ferrous sulfate, plus 4 infants aged 1 month to < 2 years (median age 12 months; 3 female patients [75%] and 1 male patient [25%]) were assigned to ferric maltol (open label arm). Ferric maltol dosing was age-dependent (0.6 mg/kg/dose twice a day [BID] for infants; 15 mg BID for 2-11 years; 30 mg BID for 12-17 years), while ferrous sulfate dosing was weight-based (3 mg/kg BID). Safety, efficacy (Hemoglobin [Hb], serum iron, transferrin saturation [TSAT], ferritin), PK, and palatability were assessed. Coprimary end points were Hb changes from baseline and safety, including gastrointestinal tolerability at week 12.

Results: A prespecified interim analysis of the primary end point (change in Hb from baseline to week 12) was conducted after 32 ferric maltol patients completed treatment. As the change was statistically significant (p < 0.0001), recruitment was stopped. The interim analysis used a Pocock spending function with a 3.45% two-sided confidence interval (CI). Both the randomized ferric maltol and ferrous sulfate groups showed meaningful increases in Hb versus baseline (descriptive increases of 1.25 and 1.15 g/dL, respectively). Post hoc analyses confirmed that these changes from baseline were statistically significant (p < 0.0001). Ferric maltol increased Hb by a mean of 1.77 g/dL in the assigned infant group over 12 weeks. Similarly, by week 12, both treatments increased serum iron and TSAT (p < 0.02), ferric maltol showed higher peak iron, and ferritin rose more with ferrous sulfate. Adverse events were mild/moderate and similar in frequency between the two treatment groups (29% ferric maltol, 30% ferrous sulfate), and adverse reactions deemed as at least possibly related to treatment were more common with ferrous sulfate. Among children aged 6-17 years, ferric maltol was rated as tasting OK, Good, or Very Good more frequently than ferrous sulfate at two time points. On day 1, 79.3% of patients receiving ferric maltol reported OK, Good, or Very Good taste, compared with 50.0% receiving ferrous sulfate (OR 0.26, 95% CI 0.07-0.97; p = 0.027). By day 28, this difference persisted (75.0% versus 45.8%), favoring ferric maltol (OR 0.28, 95% CI 0.07-1.05; p = 0.046). The significant results for taste were replicated for smell; ferric maltol had significantly better smell ratings than ferrous sulfate on days 1 and 28 (p ≤ 0.003).

Conclusions: Ferric maltol significantly improved Hb levels and iron storage within 12 weeks in children aged 1 month and above, offering potentially better tolerability and palatability compared with ferrous sulfate in children and adolescents.

口服麦芽糖铁和硫酸亚铁治疗婴儿、儿童和青少年缺铁性贫血的安全性和有效性:一项多中心随机试验
目的:这项3期、多中心、随机、开放标签的研究(NCT05126901)比较了美国和英国23个地点口服麦芽糖醇铁和硫酸亚铁的安全性、有效性、药代动力学、耐受性和适口性,评估了年龄特异性剂量对缺铁性贫血(IDA)的婴儿、儿童和青少年的治疗效果。患者和方法:在一项为期12周的研究中,共有61名2-17岁的IDA儿童/青少年(中位年龄14岁,45名女性患者[73.8%]和16名男性患者[26.2%])被随机分配到三麦芽糖醇组或硫酸亚铁组,另外4名1个月至2岁以下的婴儿(中位年龄12个月,3名女性患者[75%]和1名男性患者[25%])被分配到三麦芽糖醇组(开放标签组)。麦芽糖醇铁的剂量是年龄依赖性的(婴儿0.6 mg/kg/剂量,每日两次[BID]; 2-11岁BID为15 mg; 12-17岁BID为30 mg),而硫酸亚铁的剂量是体重依赖性的(3 mg/kg BID)。评估了安全性、有效性(血红蛋白[Hb]、血清铁、转铁蛋白饱和度[TSAT]、铁蛋白)、PK和适口性。主要终点是Hb从基线的变化和安全性,包括第12周的胃肠耐受性。结果:在32例麦芽糖醇铁患者完成治疗后,对主要终点(从基线到第12周的Hb变化)进行了预先指定的中期分析。由于变化具有统计学意义(p < 0.0001),因此停止招聘。中期分析使用Pocock消费函数,双侧置信区间(CI)为3.45%。与基线相比,随机化的三麦芽醇铁组和硫酸亚铁组Hb均有显著增加(分别增加1.25和1.15 g/dL)。事后分析证实,这些变化与基线相比具有统计学意义(p < 0.0001)。在指定的婴儿组中,铁麦芽醇在12周内平均增加了1.77 g/dL的Hb。同样,到第12周,两种处理均使血清铁和TSAT升高(p < 0.02),麦芽糖醇铁显示出更高的铁峰值,铁蛋白升高更多。不良事件在两个治疗组(29%三麦醇铁,30%硫酸亚铁)中为轻度/中度且频率相似,被认为至少可能与治疗相关的不良反应在硫酸亚铁组中更为常见。在6-17岁的儿童中,在两个时间点上,麦芽糖醇铁被评为“味道OK”、“好”或“非常好”的频率高于硫酸亚铁。第1天,79.3%接受麦芽醇铁治疗的患者报告味道OK、Good或Very Good,而50.0%接受硫酸亚铁治疗的患者报告味道OK、Good或Very Good (or 0.26, 95% CI 0.07-0.97; p = 0.027)。到第28天,这种差异持续存在(75.0%对45.8%),有利于铁麦芽醇(OR 0.28, 95% CI 0.07-1.05; p = 0.046)。味觉方面的显著结果在嗅觉方面也得到了重复;第1天和第28天,麦芽糖醇铁的气味评分显著高于硫酸亚铁(p≤0.003)。结论:麦芽糖醇铁在12周内显著改善了1个月及以上儿童的Hb水平和铁储存,与硫酸亚铁相比,在儿童和青少年中具有更好的耐受性和适口性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pediatric Drugs
Pediatric Drugs PEDIATRICS-PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
54
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Pediatric Drugs promotes the optimization and advancement of all aspects of pharmacotherapy for healthcare professionals interested in pediatric drug therapy (including vaccines). The program of review and original research articles provides healthcare decision makers with clinically applicable knowledge on issues relevant to drug therapy in all areas of neonatology and the care of children and adolescents. The Journal includes: -overviews of contentious or emerging issues. -comprehensive narrative reviews of topics relating to the effective and safe management of drug therapy through all stages of pediatric development. -practical reviews covering optimum drug management of specific clinical situations. -systematic reviews that collate empirical evidence to answer a specific research question, using explicit, systematic methods as outlined by the PRISMA statement. -Adis Drug Reviews of the properties and place in therapy of both newer and established drugs in the pediatric population. -original research articles reporting the results of well-designed studies with a strong link to clinical practice, such as clinical pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic studies, clinical trials, meta-analyses, outcomes research, and pharmacoeconomic and pharmacoepidemiological studies. Additional digital features (including animated abstracts, video abstracts, slide decks, audio slides, instructional videos, infographics, podcasts and animations) can be published with articles; these are designed to increase the visibility, readership and educational value of the journal’s content. In addition, articles published in Pediatric Drugs may be accompanied by plain language summaries to assist readers who have some knowledge of, but not in-depth expertise in, the area to understand important medical advances.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书