Health information sources and behaviour changes in a community population: a longitudinal study.

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Yoshitomo Fujita, Sachie Mori, Takehiro Michikawa, Haruhiko Imamura, Minami Sugimoto, Keiko Asakura, Yuji Nishiwaki
{"title":"Health information sources and behaviour changes in a community population: a longitudinal study.","authors":"Yoshitomo Fujita, Sachie Mori, Takehiro Michikawa, Haruhiko Imamura, Minami Sugimoto, Keiko Asakura, Yuji Nishiwaki","doi":"10.1265/ehpm.26-00060","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Accessible and trustworthy health information sources support informed decisions. Longitudinal evidence on how health information sources influence behavioural changes in community-dwelling populations remains limited. Thus, we examined associations between health information sources and behaviour changes in walking time, balanced meal consumption, and smoking cessation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Baseline (2021) and follow-up (2023) survey questionnaires were distributed to residents randomly selected from the 18 residential areas. Health information sources were classified into five categories: print media, television (TV) and radio, the Internet, family and friends, and professionals. Desirable health behaviours were defined as walking for ≥60 min/day; consuming ≥2 meals per day comprising staple grains, main dishes, and side items (SMS); and smoking cessation. Meeting these criteria was classified as good; not meeting them as poor. Improvement was defined as poor at baseline and good at follow-up. Maintenance was defined as good at both surveys. Improvement analyses included participants with poor baseline conditions. Maintenance analyses included those with good baseline conditions. Associations were analysed using multilevel modified Poisson regression models, accounting for clustering within residential areas and adjusting for covariates. Risk ratios (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) were calculated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 12 119 baseline participants, 6620 (54.6%) completed the follow-up. The most common health information sources were TV and radio (68.5%), the Internet (56.8%), and print media (48.9%). Use of family and friends as information sources was associated with improvement in walking time (RR: 1.19; 95% CI: 1.02-1.39), as was use of professionals (RR: 1.15; 95% CI: 1.03-1.28). Professionals showed a marginal association with sustained walking time (RR: 1.07; 95% CI: 0.99-1.15). TV and radio was associated with improvement in SMS meal consumption (RR: 1.13; 95% CI: 1.02-1.26), while print media was associated with maintenance of SMS meal consumption (RR: 1.05; 95% CI: 1.01-1.08). No sources were related to smoking cessation.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Health information sources showed distinct associations with improved and maintained health behaviours. Interpersonal sources were relevant for improving walking time, while mass media were linked to dietary improvement and maintenance. These findings suggest tailoring health communication strategies to specific health behaviours.</p>","PeriodicalId":11707,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Health and Preventive Medicine","volume":"31 ","pages":"48"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13413660/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Health and Preventive Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1265/ehpm.26-00060","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Accessible and trustworthy health information sources support informed decisions. Longitudinal evidence on how health information sources influence behavioural changes in community-dwelling populations remains limited. Thus, we examined associations between health information sources and behaviour changes in walking time, balanced meal consumption, and smoking cessation.

Methods: Baseline (2021) and follow-up (2023) survey questionnaires were distributed to residents randomly selected from the 18 residential areas. Health information sources were classified into five categories: print media, television (TV) and radio, the Internet, family and friends, and professionals. Desirable health behaviours were defined as walking for ≥60 min/day; consuming ≥2 meals per day comprising staple grains, main dishes, and side items (SMS); and smoking cessation. Meeting these criteria was classified as good; not meeting them as poor. Improvement was defined as poor at baseline and good at follow-up. Maintenance was defined as good at both surveys. Improvement analyses included participants with poor baseline conditions. Maintenance analyses included those with good baseline conditions. Associations were analysed using multilevel modified Poisson regression models, accounting for clustering within residential areas and adjusting for covariates. Risk ratios (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) were calculated.

Results: Of the 12 119 baseline participants, 6620 (54.6%) completed the follow-up. The most common health information sources were TV and radio (68.5%), the Internet (56.8%), and print media (48.9%). Use of family and friends as information sources was associated with improvement in walking time (RR: 1.19; 95% CI: 1.02-1.39), as was use of professionals (RR: 1.15; 95% CI: 1.03-1.28). Professionals showed a marginal association with sustained walking time (RR: 1.07; 95% CI: 0.99-1.15). TV and radio was associated with improvement in SMS meal consumption (RR: 1.13; 95% CI: 1.02-1.26), while print media was associated with maintenance of SMS meal consumption (RR: 1.05; 95% CI: 1.01-1.08). No sources were related to smoking cessation.

Conclusions: Health information sources showed distinct associations with improved and maintained health behaviours. Interpersonal sources were relevant for improving walking time, while mass media were linked to dietary improvement and maintenance. These findings suggest tailoring health communication strategies to specific health behaviours.

社区人口的健康信息来源和行为变化:一项纵向研究。
背景:可获得和值得信赖的卫生信息源支持知情决策。关于卫生信息来源如何影响社区居民行为改变的纵向证据仍然有限。因此,我们研究了健康信息来源与步行时间、均衡膳食消费和戒烟等行为变化之间的关系。方法:在18个居民区随机抽取居民,发放基线(2021年)和随访(2023年)调查问卷。健康信息来源分为五类:平面媒体、电视和广播、互联网、家庭和朋友以及专业人士。理想的健康行为定义为步行≥60分钟/天;每天吃≥2餐,包括主食、主菜和配菜(SMS);还有戒烟。满足这些标准被归类为良好;不把他们看作穷人。改善被定义为基线差,随访好。维护被定义为在两项调查中都表现良好。改善分析包括基线条件较差的参与者。维持分析包括基线条件良好的患者。使用多水平修正泊松回归模型分析关联,考虑居住区内的聚类并调整协变量。计算风险比(rr)和95%置信区间(95% ci)。结果:在12119名基线参与者中,6620人(54.6%)完成了随访。最常见的健康信息来源是电视和广播(68.5%)、互联网(56.8%)和印刷媒体(48.9%)。使用家人和朋友作为信息来源与步行时间的改善有关(RR: 1.19; 95% CI: 1.02-1.39),使用专业人士也是如此(RR: 1.15; 95% CI: 1.03-1.28)。专业人员与持续步行时间的相关性不大(RR: 1.07; 95% CI: 0.99-1.15)。电视和广播与短信餐消费的改善有关(RR: 1.13; 95% CI: 1.02-1.26),而印刷媒体与短信餐消费的维持有关(RR: 1.05; 95% CI: 1.01-1.08)。没有与戒烟有关的来源。结论:健康信息来源与改善和保持健康行为有明显的关联。人际来源与增加步行时间有关,而大众媒体与改善和维持饮食有关。这些发现建议根据具体的健康行为调整健康传播策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Environmental Health and Preventive Medicine
Environmental Health and Preventive Medicine PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH -
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
2.10%
发文量
44
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊介绍: The official journal of the Japanese Society for Hygiene, Environmental Health and Preventive Medicine (EHPM) brings a comprehensive approach to prevention and environmental health related to medical, biological, molecular biological, genetic, physical, psychosocial, chemical, and other environmental factors. Environmental Health and Preventive Medicine features definitive studies on human health sciences and provides comprehensive and unique information to a worldwide readership.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书