Neighborhood Poverty and End-of-Life Care Among Adolescents and Young Adults With Cancer.

IF 16.4
Julia Stal, Angel M Cronin, Colin Cernik, Hajime Uno, Lauren Fisher, Lanfang Xu, Cecile A Laurent, Nancy Cannizzaro, Julie Munneke, Robert M Cooper, Joshua R Lakin, Corey M Schwartz, Mallory Casperson, Chun R Chao, Lawrence H Kushi, Lori Wiener, Andrea Altschuler, Jennifer W Mack
{"title":"Neighborhood Poverty and End-of-Life Care Among Adolescents and Young Adults With Cancer.","authors":"Julia Stal, Angel M Cronin, Colin Cernik, Hajime Uno, Lauren Fisher, Lanfang Xu, Cecile A Laurent, Nancy Cannizzaro, Julie Munneke, Robert M Cooper, Joshua R Lakin, Corey M Schwartz, Mallory Casperson, Chun R Chao, Lawrence H Kushi, Lori Wiener, Andrea Altschuler, Jennifer W Mack","doi":"10.6004/jnccn.2026.7027","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Among older adults with cancer, poverty is associated with end-of-life (EoL) care quality; however, its impact on care among adolescents and young adults (AYAs) is poorly understood. We examined the relationship between neighborhood poverty and EoL care among AYAs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We identified AYAs with cancer who died between the ages of 12 and 39 years from 2003 to 2019 at Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, and Kaiser Permanente Southern California. Outcomes abstracted from medical records included care/treatment information, symptom evaluation, and psychosocial/spiritual care. Neighborhood poverty was derived by linking patient ZIP Code Tabulation Areas to the 2009 to 2013 American Community Survey. Multivariable logistic regression models assessed the relationship between neighborhood poverty and outcomes, adjusting for age at death, sex, race, ethnicity, cancer site, and care site.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Included AYAs (n=1,905) had median age of 30 years at diagnosis and 32 years at death; 55% were female, 61% were White, 27% were Hispanic/Latino, and 19% were from a high-poverty neighborhood. In bivariate analyses, compared with AYAs from low-poverty neighborhoods, AYAs from high-poverty neighborhoods were more likely to be hospitalized ≥2 times in their last 30 days (29% vs 22%; P=.004) and had lower hospice use (57% vs 64%; P=.008). Pain was assessed among 98% and was assessed less often among AYAs from high-poverty neighborhoods (96% vs 99%; P=.008). In multivariable analyses, AYAs from high-poverty neighborhoods had higher odds of >1 emergency department visit (odds ratio [OR], 1.33; 95% CI, 1.00-1.76) and >1 hospitalization in the last 30 days of life (OR, 1.33; 95% CI, 1.02-1.75), and lower odds of hospice use (OR, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.58-0.98).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Sustainable care delivery methods for patients who lack resources to address their EoL needs outside of the health care system are needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":520697,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network : JNCCN","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":16.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network : JNCCN","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.6004/jnccn.2026.7027","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Among older adults with cancer, poverty is associated with end-of-life (EoL) care quality; however, its impact on care among adolescents and young adults (AYAs) is poorly understood. We examined the relationship between neighborhood poverty and EoL care among AYAs.

Methods: We identified AYAs with cancer who died between the ages of 12 and 39 years from 2003 to 2019 at Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, and Kaiser Permanente Southern California. Outcomes abstracted from medical records included care/treatment information, symptom evaluation, and psychosocial/spiritual care. Neighborhood poverty was derived by linking patient ZIP Code Tabulation Areas to the 2009 to 2013 American Community Survey. Multivariable logistic regression models assessed the relationship between neighborhood poverty and outcomes, adjusting for age at death, sex, race, ethnicity, cancer site, and care site.

Results: Included AYAs (n=1,905) had median age of 30 years at diagnosis and 32 years at death; 55% were female, 61% were White, 27% were Hispanic/Latino, and 19% were from a high-poverty neighborhood. In bivariate analyses, compared with AYAs from low-poverty neighborhoods, AYAs from high-poverty neighborhoods were more likely to be hospitalized ≥2 times in their last 30 days (29% vs 22%; P=.004) and had lower hospice use (57% vs 64%; P=.008). Pain was assessed among 98% and was assessed less often among AYAs from high-poverty neighborhoods (96% vs 99%; P=.008). In multivariable analyses, AYAs from high-poverty neighborhoods had higher odds of >1 emergency department visit (odds ratio [OR], 1.33; 95% CI, 1.00-1.76) and >1 hospitalization in the last 30 days of life (OR, 1.33; 95% CI, 1.02-1.75), and lower odds of hospice use (OR, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.58-0.98).

Conclusions: Sustainable care delivery methods for patients who lack resources to address their EoL needs outside of the health care system are needed.

社区贫困与青少年和年轻癌症患者的临终关怀。
背景:在老年癌症患者中,贫困与临终关怀质量相关;然而,它对青少年和青壮年(AYAs)护理的影响却知之甚少。我们研究了社区贫困与社区养老护理之间的关系。方法:我们确定了2003年至2019年在丹娜-法伯癌症研究所、北加州凯撒医疗机构和南加州凯撒医疗机构中死亡的年龄在12至39岁之间的aya癌症患者。从医疗记录中提取的结果包括护理/治疗信息、症状评估和社会心理/精神护理。社区贫困是通过将患者邮政编码制表区域与2009年至2013年美国社区调查联系起来得出的。多变量logistic回归模型评估了社区贫困与结果之间的关系,调整了死亡年龄、性别、种族、民族、癌症部位和护理地点。结果:纳入的AYAs (n= 1905)诊断时的中位年龄为30岁,死亡时的中位年龄为32岁;其中55%是女性,61%是白人,27%是西班牙裔/拉丁裔,19%来自高度贫困社区。在双变量分析中,与来自低贫困社区的住院者相比,来自高贫困社区的住院者在最后30天内住院≥2次的可能性更高(29%对22%,P= 0.004),使用临终关怀的可能性更低(57%对64%,P= 0.008)。98%的青少年接受了疼痛评估,而来自高贫困社区的青少年助理接受疼痛评估的频率较低(96% vs 99%; P= 0.008)。在多变量分析中,来自高贫困社区的asa在生命最后30天内急诊就诊的几率(比值比[OR], 1.33; 95% CI, 1.00-1.76)和住院治疗的几率较高(比值比[OR], 1.33; 95% CI, 1.02-1.75),使用临终关怀的几率较低(比值比[OR], 0.76; 95% CI, 0.58-0.98)。结论:需要为缺乏资源的患者提供可持续的医疗服务方法,以满足卫生保健系统外的EoL需求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书