Refeeding syndrome: Applicability of ASPEN criteria in patients with intestinal failure.

Intestinal Failure (New York, N.Y.) Pub Date : 2025-12-31 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.1016/j.intf.2025.100341
Héctor Solar, Mariana Laura Ortega, Lucía Blengini, Camila Cáceres, Gabriel Gondolesi
{"title":"Refeeding syndrome: Applicability of ASPEN criteria in patients with intestinal failure.","authors":"Héctor Solar, Mariana Laura Ortega, Lucía Blengini, Camila Cáceres, Gabriel Gondolesi","doi":"10.1016/j.intf.2025.100341","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Refeeding syndrome (RS) is defined as the reduction in serum levels of phosphorus, potassium, magnesium and/or thiamine, associated with the initiation of nutritional intake in patients with prolonged periods of low intake. In patients with intestinal failure (IF), risk factors for RS may be present. The aims of our study were to determine how many IF patients were at risk of RS, to determine how many of them developed RS and the accuracy of ASPEN risk criteria.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>A retrospective, observational, cross-sectional study was conducted. From January 2020 to July 2024 adult patients with IF diagnosis who started parenteral nutrition were included. The variables analyzed were sex, age, percentage of weight loss, BMI, pathophysiological classification of the IF, and serum values of potassium, magnesium, and phosphorus. Risk was classified as none, significant or moderate and the development as none, mild, moderate or severe.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 86 adult patients were included, 20.9 % had no risk criteria for RS, 2.3 % had moderate risk, and 76.7 % had significant risk. Fifty percent of patients with no risk criteria and 54.4 % of patients who did have risk criteria developed RS. In 63.0 % IF patients it was mild, 26.1 % moderate and severe in 10.9 %. According to the pathophysiological classification of IF, there were no differences between the groups (p > 0.9).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In this cohort of IF patients, 53.5 % developed RS. ASPEN criteria did not predict the development of 50 %. Sensitivity was 0.8 and specificity 0.23.</p>","PeriodicalId":520517,"journal":{"name":"Intestinal Failure (New York, N.Y.)","volume":"9 ","pages":"100341"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13365916/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Intestinal Failure (New York, N.Y.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intf.2025.100341","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Refeeding syndrome (RS) is defined as the reduction in serum levels of phosphorus, potassium, magnesium and/or thiamine, associated with the initiation of nutritional intake in patients with prolonged periods of low intake. In patients with intestinal failure (IF), risk factors for RS may be present. The aims of our study were to determine how many IF patients were at risk of RS, to determine how many of them developed RS and the accuracy of ASPEN risk criteria.

Material and methods: A retrospective, observational, cross-sectional study was conducted. From January 2020 to July 2024 adult patients with IF diagnosis who started parenteral nutrition were included. The variables analyzed were sex, age, percentage of weight loss, BMI, pathophysiological classification of the IF, and serum values of potassium, magnesium, and phosphorus. Risk was classified as none, significant or moderate and the development as none, mild, moderate or severe.

Results: A total of 86 adult patients were included, 20.9 % had no risk criteria for RS, 2.3 % had moderate risk, and 76.7 % had significant risk. Fifty percent of patients with no risk criteria and 54.4 % of patients who did have risk criteria developed RS. In 63.0 % IF patients it was mild, 26.1 % moderate and severe in 10.9 %. According to the pathophysiological classification of IF, there were no differences between the groups (p > 0.9).

Conclusion: In this cohort of IF patients, 53.5 % developed RS. ASPEN criteria did not predict the development of 50 %. Sensitivity was 0.8 and specificity 0.23.

再喂养综合征:ASPEN标准在肠衰竭患者中的适用性。
背景:再喂养综合征(RS)被定义为血清磷、钾、镁和/或硫胺素水平的降低,与长期低摄入患者开始营养摄入有关。在肠衰竭(IF)患者中,RS的危险因素可能存在。我们研究的目的是确定有多少IF患者有RS的风险,确定有多少患者发展为RS以及ASPEN风险标准的准确性。材料和方法:回顾性、观察性、横断面研究。纳入2020年1月至2024年7月诊断为IF并开始肠外营养的成年患者。分析的变量包括性别、年龄、体重减轻百分比、BMI、IF的病理生理分类以及钾、镁和磷的血清值。风险分为无、显著或中度,发展分为无、轻度、中度或重度。结果:共纳入86例成人患者,20.9 %无RS危险标准,2.3 %有中度危险,76.7 %有显著危险。50%的无风险标准的患者和54.4% %有风险标准的患者发生RS。63. %的IF患者为轻度,26.1 %为中度,10.9 %为重度。根据IF的病理生理分类,两组间无差异(p > 0.9)。结论:在这组IF患者中,53.5 %发展为RS,而ASPEN标准不能预测50% %的发展。敏感性为0.8,特异性为0.23。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书