Spirituality in nursing professionals working in critical health care settings: Systematic review and meta-analysis

Enfermeria intensiva Pub Date : 2026-07-01 Epub Date: 2026-07-14 DOI:10.1016/j.enfie.2026.500606
Edna Margarita Osorio-Durán RN, MSc, PhD candidate, Mónica López de-Ávila RN, Jennifer Rojas-Reyes RN, MSc, PhD, Wilson Cañon-Montañez RN, MSc, PhD, Alba Luz Rodríguez-Acelas RN, MSc, PhD
{"title":"Spirituality in nursing professionals working in critical health care settings: Systematic review and meta-analysis","authors":"Edna Margarita Osorio-Durán RN, MSc, PhD candidate,&nbsp;Mónica López de-Ávila RN,&nbsp;Jennifer Rojas-Reyes RN, MSc, PhD,&nbsp;Wilson Cañon-Montañez RN, MSc, PhD,&nbsp;Alba Luz Rodríguez-Acelas RN, MSc, PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.enfie.2026.500606","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Spirituality, recognized as an essential aspect of nursing care, contributes to well-being and resilience in critical care settings. Its integration into practice strengthens the meaning and sense of meaning and purpose in the lives of nursing professionals.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To systematically review the evidence on spirituality among nursing professionals working in critical healthcare settings.</div></div><div><h3>Methodology</h3><div>A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted following the PRISMA guidelines. The protocol was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42023371984). Searches were performed from inception to april 2024 in the following databases: Medline/PubMed, Embase, Lilacs, Cochrane CENTRAL, and Web of Science. The meta-analysis of individual means was performed using a random-effects model. Untransformed means (MRAW) were used to estimate the 95% confidence intervals of individual studies, while the I<sup>2</sup> and tau<sup>2</sup> statistics assessed heterogeneity.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 1175 studies were identified, 34 of which were included in the systematic review and 4 in the meta-analysis. A prevalence of 58,8% was observed in non-experimental quantitative studies, with “spirituality education and meeting spiritual needs” being the main theme. Meta-analyses were conducted on studies using scales to assess spirituality levels, particularly the Spiritual Care Competence Scale (SCCS), which showed the best performance with an MRAW of 98,56 (IC 95%: 97,86; 99,25; I<sup>2</sup>: 0,0%), indicating a moderate level of competence in spiritual care.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The findings highlight the importance of spirituality in professional performance in critical care settings, emerging as a key component for promoting well-being by strengthening resilience in the face of caregiving challenges.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":93991,"journal":{"name":"Enfermeria intensiva","volume":"37 3","pages":"Article 500606"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Enfermeria intensiva","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2529984026000297","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/7/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Spirituality, recognized as an essential aspect of nursing care, contributes to well-being and resilience in critical care settings. Its integration into practice strengthens the meaning and sense of meaning and purpose in the lives of nursing professionals.

Objective

To systematically review the evidence on spirituality among nursing professionals working in critical healthcare settings.

Methodology

A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted following the PRISMA guidelines. The protocol was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42023371984). Searches were performed from inception to april 2024 in the following databases: Medline/PubMed, Embase, Lilacs, Cochrane CENTRAL, and Web of Science. The meta-analysis of individual means was performed using a random-effects model. Untransformed means (MRAW) were used to estimate the 95% confidence intervals of individual studies, while the I2 and tau2 statistics assessed heterogeneity.

Results

A total of 1175 studies were identified, 34 of which were included in the systematic review and 4 in the meta-analysis. A prevalence of 58,8% was observed in non-experimental quantitative studies, with “spirituality education and meeting spiritual needs” being the main theme. Meta-analyses were conducted on studies using scales to assess spirituality levels, particularly the Spiritual Care Competence Scale (SCCS), which showed the best performance with an MRAW of 98,56 (IC 95%: 97,86; 99,25; I2: 0,0%), indicating a moderate level of competence in spiritual care.

Conclusions

The findings highlight the importance of spirituality in professional performance in critical care settings, emerging as a key component for promoting well-being by strengthening resilience in the face of caregiving challenges.
在关键卫生保健环境中工作的护理专业人员的灵性:系统回顾和荟萃分析。
简介:精神,被认为是护理的一个重要方面,有助于在重症护理环境的福祉和弹性。它与实践的结合加强了护理专业人员生活的意义和意义和目的感。目的:系统地回顾在关键医疗环境中工作的护理专业人员的灵性的证据。方法:按照PRISMA指南进行系统评价和荟萃分析。该协议已在PROSPERO (CRD42023371984)中注册。从开始到2024年4月,在以下数据库中进行了搜索:Medline/PubMed, Embase, Lilacs, Cochrane CENTRAL和Web of Science。采用随机效应模型对个体均值进行meta分析。使用未转化均值(MRAW)估计单个研究的95%置信区间,而I2和tau2统计量评估异质性。结果:共纳入1175项研究,其中34项纳入系统评价,4项纳入荟萃分析。在非实验定量研究中,以“灵性教育和满足精神需求”为主题的患病率为58.8%。对使用量表评估精神护理能力水平的研究进行meta分析,其中精神护理能力量表(SCCS)表现最佳,MRAW为98,56 (IC 95%: 97,86; 99,25; I2: 0,0%),表明精神护理能力处于中等水平。结论:研究结果强调了精神在重症护理环境中专业表现的重要性,通过加强面对护理挑战的弹性,精神成为促进福祉的关键组成部分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书