Are Ethiopian reproductive health policies and related documents inclusive of women with disabilities? A policy content analysis using EquiFrame.

IF 3 2区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Ebisa Turi, Lisa Gold, Ha N D Le, Hasheem Mannan, Eric H Y Lau, Julie Abimanyi-Ochom
{"title":"Are Ethiopian reproductive health policies and related documents inclusive of women with disabilities? A policy content analysis using EquiFrame.","authors":"Ebisa Turi, Lisa Gold, Ha N D Le, Hasheem Mannan, Eric H Y Lau, Julie Abimanyi-Ochom","doi":"10.1016/j.dhjo.2026.102125","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Evidence indicates that persons with disabilities in Ethiopia have greater unmet healthcare need. The notions of \"leave no one behind\" and \"reach the furthest behind\" require a disability-inclusive health policy. Sexual and reproductive healthcare policies play a paramount role in shaping equity and disability inclusion.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To examine the extent to which current reproductive health policies and related documents are inclusive of women with disabilities in Ethiopia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The EquiFrame framework was applied to assess the inclusion of women with disabilities and the concept of human rights in Ethiopia's reproductive health policies. Using a data extraction matrix, 21 core concepts were mapped against 11 documents. References to each core concept were rated on a 0-4 scale (0 = not mentioned; 1 = mentioned; 2 = mentioned and explained; 3 = actions identified; 4 = monitoring intention expressed). Four composite measures were calculated: core concept coverage, core concept quality, total references and average score.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eleven policy and policy-related documents were included. Most documents, 9(81.8%), have the core concept coverage above fifty percent. However, none demonstrated a core concept quality above 50%. Only 10(47.6%) of the core concepts had an average score of two or above. Total reference ranges from 0.0% in core concept family support to 7.2% in core concepts such as non-discrimination, integration and individualized services. Average quality score ranges from 0 in family support to 2.6 in access.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Although Ethiopia's constitution guarantees disability rights, the implicit inclusion of women with disabilities in reproductive health documents is concerning and calls for targeted policy action. Co-design with women with disabilities and organisations of persons with disabilities, along with comprehensive strategies, would ensure meaningful inclusion in reproductive health policies.</p>","PeriodicalId":49300,"journal":{"name":"Disability and Health Journal","volume":" ","pages":"102125"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Disability and Health Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dhjo.2026.102125","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Evidence indicates that persons with disabilities in Ethiopia have greater unmet healthcare need. The notions of "leave no one behind" and "reach the furthest behind" require a disability-inclusive health policy. Sexual and reproductive healthcare policies play a paramount role in shaping equity and disability inclusion.

Objective: To examine the extent to which current reproductive health policies and related documents are inclusive of women with disabilities in Ethiopia.

Methods: The EquiFrame framework was applied to assess the inclusion of women with disabilities and the concept of human rights in Ethiopia's reproductive health policies. Using a data extraction matrix, 21 core concepts were mapped against 11 documents. References to each core concept were rated on a 0-4 scale (0 = not mentioned; 1 = mentioned; 2 = mentioned and explained; 3 = actions identified; 4 = monitoring intention expressed). Four composite measures were calculated: core concept coverage, core concept quality, total references and average score.

Results: Eleven policy and policy-related documents were included. Most documents, 9(81.8%), have the core concept coverage above fifty percent. However, none demonstrated a core concept quality above 50%. Only 10(47.6%) of the core concepts had an average score of two or above. Total reference ranges from 0.0% in core concept family support to 7.2% in core concepts such as non-discrimination, integration and individualized services. Average quality score ranges from 0 in family support to 2.6 in access.

Conclusion: Although Ethiopia's constitution guarantees disability rights, the implicit inclusion of women with disabilities in reproductive health documents is concerning and calls for targeted policy action. Co-design with women with disabilities and organisations of persons with disabilities, along with comprehensive strategies, would ensure meaningful inclusion in reproductive health policies.

埃塞俄比亚的生殖健康政策和相关文件是否包括残疾妇女?使用EquiFrame进行策略内容分析。
背景:证据表明,埃塞俄比亚的残疾人有更多未满足的医疗保健需求。“不让任何一个人掉队”和“帮助落在最后面的人”的概念要求制定包容残疾的卫生政策。性健康和生殖健康政策在塑造公平和包容残疾方面发挥着至关重要的作用。目的:审查埃塞俄比亚现行生殖健康政策和相关文件在多大程度上包括残疾妇女。方法:应用EquiFrame框架评估在埃塞俄比亚生殖健康政策中纳入残疾妇女和人权概念的情况。使用数据提取矩阵,将21个核心概念映射到11个文档。引用每个核心概念被评为0 - 4范围(0 = 未提及;1 = 提到;2 = 提到和解释;3 = 动作识别;4 = 监控意图表达)。计算核心概念覆盖率、核心概念质量、总参考文献和平均分四项综合指标。结果:纳入政策及相关文件11份。大多数文件(81.8%)的核心概念覆盖率超过50%。然而,没有一款游戏的核心概念质量超过50%。只有10个(47.6%)核心概念的平均分在2分以上。家庭支持的核心概念为0.0%,非歧视、融合和个性化服务等核心概念为7.2%。平均质量得分从家庭支持的0分到可及性的2.6分。结论:尽管埃塞俄比亚《宪法》保障残疾人权利,但将残疾妇女含蓄地纳入生殖健康文件令人关切,需要采取有针对性的政策行动。与残疾妇女和残疾人组织共同设计,以及制定综合战略,将确保有意义地纳入生殖健康政策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Disability and Health Journal
Disability and Health Journal HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
6.70%
发文量
134
审稿时长
34 days
期刊介绍: Disability and Health Journal is a scientific, scholarly, and multidisciplinary journal for reporting original contributions that advance knowledge in disability and health. Topics may be related to global health, quality of life, and specific health conditions as they relate to disability. Such contributions include: • Reports of empirical research on the characteristics of persons with disabilities, environment, health outcomes, and determinants of health • Reports of empirical research on the Systematic or other evidence-based reviews and tightly conceived theoretical interpretations of research literature • Reports of empirical research on the Evaluative research on new interventions, technologies, and programs • Reports of empirical research on the Reports on issues or policies affecting the health and/or quality of life for persons with disabilities, using a scientific base.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书