Identifying individuals who could benefit from a palliative approach to their care using a multi-phase, consultative, iterative approach.

IF 3.7 2区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Nicole Williams, Lynn Martin, John P Hirdes, Aynharan Sinnarajah, Christina Vadeboncoeur, Margaret Saari, Veronique M Boscart, Dawn M Guthrie
{"title":"Identifying individuals who could benefit from a palliative approach to their care using a multi-phase, consultative, iterative approach.","authors":"Nicole Williams, Lynn Martin, John P Hirdes, Aynharan Sinnarajah, Christina Vadeboncoeur, Margaret Saari, Veronique M Boscart, Dawn M Guthrie","doi":"10.1186/s12904-026-02233-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Access to a palliative approach to care improves the quality of life of individuals with a serious illness and their families. This paper describes the development of a decision-support tool that identifies individuals receiving home care and long-term care services who could potentially benefit from a palliative approach to their care based on information available in interRAI assessments used in those sectors as part of regular practice.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A consultative and iterative multi-phase approach was employed to develop the \"Serious Illness Collaborative Action Plan\" (or Serious Illness CAP), over an 18-month period. Criteria for triggering this CAP were established with 49 individuals across seven advisory groups; criteria were operationalized using items and measures available in interRAI instruments and tested using anonymized population-level data from home care (N = 568,586) and LTC (N = 35,713) sectors in three Canadian provinces were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The CAP is based on the presence of health instability and potentially modifiable exacerbating issues (i.e., severe/excruciating daily pain, moderate/severe mood problems, severe fatigue, self-reported loneliness or social isolation, and condition/disease that create instability in thinking, self-care, mood, or behaviour patterns). The CAP identifies three distinct groups: those at high priority for a palliative approach, those at moderate priority, and those who don't trigger the CAP. Among home care clients in Ontario, 42% triggered the CAP; 10% (n = 57,025) at a high priority, and 32% (n = 181,531) at a moderate priority. Within LTC homes in Nova Scotia and Saskatchewan, these equaled 12% (overall), 5.2% (n = 1,858 as high priority) and 6.8% (n = 2,411 as moderate priority).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The development of this new CAP will help support clinicians in home care and LTC settings to engage in conversations and promote awareness of the benefits of a palliative approach to care for individuals with serious or life-limiting illness and their families.</p>","PeriodicalId":48945,"journal":{"name":"BMC Palliative Care","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13647850/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Palliative Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12904-026-02233-7","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Access to a palliative approach to care improves the quality of life of individuals with a serious illness and their families. This paper describes the development of a decision-support tool that identifies individuals receiving home care and long-term care services who could potentially benefit from a palliative approach to their care based on information available in interRAI assessments used in those sectors as part of regular practice.

Methods: A consultative and iterative multi-phase approach was employed to develop the "Serious Illness Collaborative Action Plan" (or Serious Illness CAP), over an 18-month period. Criteria for triggering this CAP were established with 49 individuals across seven advisory groups; criteria were operationalized using items and measures available in interRAI instruments and tested using anonymized population-level data from home care (N = 568,586) and LTC (N = 35,713) sectors in three Canadian provinces were analyzed.

Results: The CAP is based on the presence of health instability and potentially modifiable exacerbating issues (i.e., severe/excruciating daily pain, moderate/severe mood problems, severe fatigue, self-reported loneliness or social isolation, and condition/disease that create instability in thinking, self-care, mood, or behaviour patterns). The CAP identifies three distinct groups: those at high priority for a palliative approach, those at moderate priority, and those who don't trigger the CAP. Among home care clients in Ontario, 42% triggered the CAP; 10% (n = 57,025) at a high priority, and 32% (n = 181,531) at a moderate priority. Within LTC homes in Nova Scotia and Saskatchewan, these equaled 12% (overall), 5.2% (n = 1,858 as high priority) and 6.8% (n = 2,411 as moderate priority).

Conclusions: The development of this new CAP will help support clinicians in home care and LTC settings to engage in conversations and promote awareness of the benefits of a palliative approach to care for individuals with serious or life-limiting illness and their families.

使用多阶段、咨询、迭代的方法确定可以从姑息治疗方法中受益的个体。
背景:获得姑息治疗方法可以改善患有严重疾病的个人及其家庭的生活质量。本文描述了一种决策支持工具的开发,该工具可以根据在这些部门作为常规实践的一部分使用的interRAI评估中提供的信息,确定接受家庭护理和长期护理服务的个人,这些个人可能从姑息治疗方法中获益。方法:采用协商和迭代的多阶段方法,在18个月的时间内制定“严重疾病协作行动计划”(或严重疾病CAP)。触发该CAP的标准是由七个咨询小组的49名个人制定的;使用interRAI工具中可用的项目和措施对标准进行操作,并使用来自加拿大三个省的家庭护理(N = 568,586)和LTC (N = 35,713)部门的匿名人口水平数据进行测试。结果:CAP是基于健康不稳定和潜在可改变的恶化问题的存在(即,严重/难以忍受的日常疼痛,中度/重度情绪问题,严重疲劳,自我报告的孤独或社会隔离,以及导致思维、自我照顾、情绪或行为模式不稳定的状况/疾病)。CAP确定了三个不同的群体:姑息治疗方法的高优先级群体,中等优先级群体和不触发CAP的群体。在安大略省的家庭护理客户中,42%触发了CAP;10% (n = 57,025)为高优先级,32% (n = 181,531)为中等优先级。在新斯科舍省和萨斯喀彻温省的LTC家庭中,这些比例分别为12%(总体)、5.2% (n = 1,858)和6.8% (n = 2,411)。结论:这一新CAP的开发将有助于支持家庭护理和LTC环境中的临床医生参与对话,并提高对姑息治疗方法对患有严重或限制生命的疾病的个人及其家庭的益处的认识。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Palliative Care
BMC Palliative Care HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
9.70%
发文量
201
审稿时长
21 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Palliative Care is an open access journal publishing original peer-reviewed research articles in the clinical, scientific, ethical and policy issues, local and international, regarding all aspects of hospice and palliative care for the dying and for those with profound suffering related to chronic illness.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书