Shellie Radford, Anoop John, Antonina Latino-Kelly, Catherine Alexander, Owen Wilding, Jaimin Chauhan, Farhad Shokraneh, Siddhee Pradhan, Gordon W Moran
{"title":"Current and novel biomarkers for predicting and assessing therapeutic response in inflammatory bowel disease: a systematic review.","authors":"Shellie Radford, Anoop John, Antonina Latino-Kelly, Catherine Alexander, Owen Wilding, Jaimin Chauhan, Farhad Shokraneh, Siddhee Pradhan, Gordon W Moran","doi":"10.1177/17562848261463913","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Despite the availability of various advanced treatments for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), it has been impossible to predict which therapy would offer the best response to the patient.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of this systematic review is to explore current and novel biomarkers for predicting and assessing therapeutic response to advanced therapies presently in clinical use in IBD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic review was conducted in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines (PROSPERO ID: CRD42024559652). A systematic literature search for all primary research looking at biomarkers in predicting response to advanced therapy in Crohn's disease (CD) or ulcerative colitis (UC) was conducted across MEDLINE, EMBASE and PubMed databases. Abstracts, case studies, commentary papers and review articles were excluded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifty-five studies were included in this review investigating baseline predictors of response to anti-tumour necrosis factor, ustekinumab, vedolizumab and ozanimod therapies in both CD and UC. The various biomarkers studied included blood, serum, faecal, histological, nutrient, genetic and pharmacokinetic markers. C-reactive protein and faecal calprotectin were among the most commonly studied biomarkers; however, there were inconsistencies with regard to optimum cutoff values used and hence their roles as baseline predictors of response to advanced therapies are yet unclear. None of the biomarker studies to date has yet transitioned to clinical use.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Biomarker identification to predict therapeutic response persists to be an ongoing challenge. Further work through large well-designed prospective cohort studies is needed to further refine the clinical utility of these tools.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong><i>The protocol was prospectively registered with the PROSPERO database (CRD42024559652)</i>.</p>","PeriodicalId":48770,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic Advances in Gastroenterology","volume":"19 ","pages":"17562848261463913"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13365697/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Therapeutic Advances in Gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17562848261463913","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Despite the availability of various advanced treatments for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), it has been impossible to predict which therapy would offer the best response to the patient.
Objective: The aim of this systematic review is to explore current and novel biomarkers for predicting and assessing therapeutic response to advanced therapies presently in clinical use in IBD.
Methods: A systematic review was conducted in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines (PROSPERO ID: CRD42024559652). A systematic literature search for all primary research looking at biomarkers in predicting response to advanced therapy in Crohn's disease (CD) or ulcerative colitis (UC) was conducted across MEDLINE, EMBASE and PubMed databases. Abstracts, case studies, commentary papers and review articles were excluded.
Results: Fifty-five studies were included in this review investigating baseline predictors of response to anti-tumour necrosis factor, ustekinumab, vedolizumab and ozanimod therapies in both CD and UC. The various biomarkers studied included blood, serum, faecal, histological, nutrient, genetic and pharmacokinetic markers. C-reactive protein and faecal calprotectin were among the most commonly studied biomarkers; however, there were inconsistencies with regard to optimum cutoff values used and hence their roles as baseline predictors of response to advanced therapies are yet unclear. None of the biomarker studies to date has yet transitioned to clinical use.
Conclusion: Biomarker identification to predict therapeutic response persists to be an ongoing challenge. Further work through large well-designed prospective cohort studies is needed to further refine the clinical utility of these tools.
Trial registration: The protocol was prospectively registered with the PROSPERO database (CRD42024559652).
期刊介绍:
Therapeutic Advances in Gastroenterology is an open access journal which delivers the highest quality peer-reviewed original research articles, reviews, and scholarly comment on pioneering efforts and innovative studies in the medical treatment of gastrointestinal and hepatic disorders. The journal has a strong clinical and pharmacological focus and is aimed at an international audience of clinicians and researchers in gastroenterology and related disciplines, providing an online forum for rapid dissemination of recent research and perspectives in this area.
The editors welcome original research articles across all areas of gastroenterology and hepatology.
The journal publishes original research articles and review articles primarily. Original research manuscripts may include laboratory, animal or human/clinical studies – all phases. Letters to the Editor and Case Reports will also be considered.