What Is at Stake in Genetic Newborn Screening for Rare Diseases? An Exploratory Qualitative Study of Parents' and Expectant Parents' Concerns in the Screen4Care Project.
Sylvia Martin, Åsa Grauman, Joshua Coulter, Mats Hansson, Alessandra Ferlini, Fernanda Fortunato, Silvia Ottombrino, Roman Raming, Ferdinand Knieling, Felix Wachter, Christina Saier, Kathrin Freyler, Jorien Veldwijk
{"title":"What Is at Stake in Genetic Newborn Screening for Rare Diseases? An Exploratory Qualitative Study of Parents' and Expectant Parents' Concerns in the Screen4Care Project.","authors":"Sylvia Martin, Åsa Grauman, Joshua Coulter, Mats Hansson, Alessandra Ferlini, Fernanda Fortunato, Silvia Ottombrino, Roman Raming, Ferdinand Knieling, Felix Wachter, Christina Saier, Kathrin Freyler, Jorien Veldwijk","doi":"10.1159/000553234","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The diagnostic journey for rare diseases (RDs) often involves lengthy delays and significant burdens on patients and their families. Genetic newborn screening (NBS) for RDs offers a potential opportunity for early diagnosis and treatment. This study explores factors influencing parental decisions regarding participation in genetic NBS for RDs in two European countries (Italy and Germany).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This mixed-methods qualitative study is composed of focus group discussions and ranking exercises. It was conducted with parents seeking genetic testing (n = 5) and expectant parents from the general population (n = 11). All participants were recruited in spring 2024 in Germany and winter 2024 in Italy via contacts from genetic centres and obstetric services. Thematic analysis was performed by two independent coders to identify main themes and subthemes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Three key themes were identified: (1) the complexity of the decision-making process, (2) the importance of certainty and disease characteristics, and (3) the anticipation of negative consequences. Participants trusted healthcare professionals to guide their decisions, also emphasizing the need for extensive education and comprehensive support systems. Concerns about test accuracy, potential psychological impact of uncertain or positive results, and anticipated social implications were also reported.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These findings highlight the nuanced considerations surrounding the implementation of genetic NBS for RDs and the necessity of addressing parental experiences in clinical practice and policy development. Participants emphasized the importance of accessible education and clear communication, the support of trusted healthcare professionals and that ethical reflection is essential for the equitable integration of genetic NBS into newborn care.</p>","PeriodicalId":49650,"journal":{"name":"Public Health Genomics","volume":" ","pages":"242-256"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13485283/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Public Health Genomics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000553234","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/7/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: The diagnostic journey for rare diseases (RDs) often involves lengthy delays and significant burdens on patients and their families. Genetic newborn screening (NBS) for RDs offers a potential opportunity for early diagnosis and treatment. This study explores factors influencing parental decisions regarding participation in genetic NBS for RDs in two European countries (Italy and Germany).
Methods: This mixed-methods qualitative study is composed of focus group discussions and ranking exercises. It was conducted with parents seeking genetic testing (n = 5) and expectant parents from the general population (n = 11). All participants were recruited in spring 2024 in Germany and winter 2024 in Italy via contacts from genetic centres and obstetric services. Thematic analysis was performed by two independent coders to identify main themes and subthemes.
Results: Three key themes were identified: (1) the complexity of the decision-making process, (2) the importance of certainty and disease characteristics, and (3) the anticipation of negative consequences. Participants trusted healthcare professionals to guide their decisions, also emphasizing the need for extensive education and comprehensive support systems. Concerns about test accuracy, potential psychological impact of uncertain or positive results, and anticipated social implications were also reported.
Conclusion: These findings highlight the nuanced considerations surrounding the implementation of genetic NBS for RDs and the necessity of addressing parental experiences in clinical practice and policy development. Participants emphasized the importance of accessible education and clear communication, the support of trusted healthcare professionals and that ethical reflection is essential for the equitable integration of genetic NBS into newborn care.
期刊介绍:
''Public Health Genomics'' is the leading international journal focusing on the timely translation of genome-based knowledge and technologies into public health, health policies, and healthcare as a whole. This peer-reviewed journal is a bimonthly forum featuring original papers, reviews, short communications, and policy statements. It is supplemented by topic-specific issues providing a comprehensive, holistic and ''all-inclusive'' picture of the chosen subject. Multidisciplinary in scope, it combines theoretical and empirical work from a range of disciplines, notably public health, molecular and medical sciences, the humanities and social sciences. In so doing, it also takes into account rapid scientific advances from fields such as systems biology, microbiomics, epigenomics or information and communication technologies as well as the hight potential of ''big data'' for public health.