What Is at Stake in Genetic Newborn Screening for Rare Diseases? An Exploratory Qualitative Study of Parents' and Expectant Parents' Concerns in the Screen4Care Project.

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q4 GENETICS & HEREDITY
Public Health Genomics Pub Date : 2026-01-01 Epub Date: 2026-07-14 DOI:10.1159/000553234
Sylvia Martin, Åsa Grauman, Joshua Coulter, Mats Hansson, Alessandra Ferlini, Fernanda Fortunato, Silvia Ottombrino, Roman Raming, Ferdinand Knieling, Felix Wachter, Christina Saier, Kathrin Freyler, Jorien Veldwijk
{"title":"What Is at Stake in Genetic Newborn Screening for Rare Diseases? An Exploratory Qualitative Study of Parents' and Expectant Parents' Concerns in the Screen4Care Project.","authors":"Sylvia Martin, Åsa Grauman, Joshua Coulter, Mats Hansson, Alessandra Ferlini, Fernanda Fortunato, Silvia Ottombrino, Roman Raming, Ferdinand Knieling, Felix Wachter, Christina Saier, Kathrin Freyler, Jorien Veldwijk","doi":"10.1159/000553234","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The diagnostic journey for rare diseases (RDs) often involves lengthy delays and significant burdens on patients and their families. Genetic newborn screening (NBS) for RDs offers a potential opportunity for early diagnosis and treatment. This study explores factors influencing parental decisions regarding participation in genetic NBS for RDs in two European countries (Italy and Germany).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This mixed-methods qualitative study is composed of focus group discussions and ranking exercises. It was conducted with parents seeking genetic testing (n = 5) and expectant parents from the general population (n = 11). All participants were recruited in spring 2024 in Germany and winter 2024 in Italy via contacts from genetic centres and obstetric services. Thematic analysis was performed by two independent coders to identify main themes and subthemes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Three key themes were identified: (1) the complexity of the decision-making process, (2) the importance of certainty and disease characteristics, and (3) the anticipation of negative consequences. Participants trusted healthcare professionals to guide their decisions, also emphasizing the need for extensive education and comprehensive support systems. Concerns about test accuracy, potential psychological impact of uncertain or positive results, and anticipated social implications were also reported.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These findings highlight the nuanced considerations surrounding the implementation of genetic NBS for RDs and the necessity of addressing parental experiences in clinical practice and policy development. Participants emphasized the importance of accessible education and clear communication, the support of trusted healthcare professionals and that ethical reflection is essential for the equitable integration of genetic NBS into newborn care.</p>","PeriodicalId":49650,"journal":{"name":"Public Health Genomics","volume":" ","pages":"242-256"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13485283/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Public Health Genomics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000553234","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/7/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The diagnostic journey for rare diseases (RDs) often involves lengthy delays and significant burdens on patients and their families. Genetic newborn screening (NBS) for RDs offers a potential opportunity for early diagnosis and treatment. This study explores factors influencing parental decisions regarding participation in genetic NBS for RDs in two European countries (Italy and Germany).

Methods: This mixed-methods qualitative study is composed of focus group discussions and ranking exercises. It was conducted with parents seeking genetic testing (n = 5) and expectant parents from the general population (n = 11). All participants were recruited in spring 2024 in Germany and winter 2024 in Italy via contacts from genetic centres and obstetric services. Thematic analysis was performed by two independent coders to identify main themes and subthemes.

Results: Three key themes were identified: (1) the complexity of the decision-making process, (2) the importance of certainty and disease characteristics, and (3) the anticipation of negative consequences. Participants trusted healthcare professionals to guide their decisions, also emphasizing the need for extensive education and comprehensive support systems. Concerns about test accuracy, potential psychological impact of uncertain or positive results, and anticipated social implications were also reported.

Conclusion: These findings highlight the nuanced considerations surrounding the implementation of genetic NBS for RDs and the necessity of addressing parental experiences in clinical practice and policy development. Participants emphasized the importance of accessible education and clear communication, the support of trusted healthcare professionals and that ethical reflection is essential for the equitable integration of genetic NBS into newborn care.

新生儿罕见病基因筛查的风险是什么?-对Screen4Care项目中父母和准父母关注点的探索性质的研究。
背景:罕见病(RDs)的诊断过程往往涉及长时间的延误和对患者及其家庭的重大负担。新生儿遗传筛查(NBS)为rd提供了早期诊断和治疗的潜在机会。目的:本研究在两个欧洲国家(意大利和德国)探讨了影响父母对rd参与的遗传NBS决策的因素。方法:采用焦点小组讨论和排序练习相结合的方法进行定性研究。该研究是在寻求基因检测的父母(n=5)和来自普通人群的预期父母(n=11)中进行的。所有参与者于2024年春季在德国招募,2024年冬季在意大利招募,通过遗传中心和产科服务的临床中心联系。由两名独立编码员进行主题分析,以确定主题和副主题。结果:构建了三个关键主题:1)决策过程的复杂性,2)确定性和疾病特征的重要性,以及3)对负面后果的预期。与会者信任医疗保健专业人员指导他们的决定,同时强调需要广泛的教育和全面的支持系统。对测试准确性、不确定或阳性结果的潜在心理影响以及预期的社会影响的担忧也被报道。结论:这些发现突出了围绕RDs实施的遗传NBS的微妙考虑,以及在临床实践和政策制定中解决父母经验的必要性。与会者强调了无障碍教育和明确沟通的重要性,值得信赖的卫生保健专业人员的支持以及道德反思对于将遗传NBS公平地纳入新生儿护理至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Public Health Genomics
Public Health Genomics 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: ''Public Health Genomics'' is the leading international journal focusing on the timely translation of genome-based knowledge and technologies into public health, health policies, and healthcare as a whole. This peer-reviewed journal is a bimonthly forum featuring original papers, reviews, short communications, and policy statements. It is supplemented by topic-specific issues providing a comprehensive, holistic and ''all-inclusive'' picture of the chosen subject. Multidisciplinary in scope, it combines theoretical and empirical work from a range of disciplines, notably public health, molecular and medical sciences, the humanities and social sciences. In so doing, it also takes into account rapid scientific advances from fields such as systems biology, microbiomics, epigenomics or information and communication technologies as well as the hight potential of ''big data'' for public health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书