Shock Index versus Systolic Blood Pressure for Mortality Prediction in Traumatic Hemorrhage: A Comparative Prognostic Evaluation in a Middle-Income Country.

IF 1.7 Q3 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Open Access Emergency Medicine Pub Date : 2026-07-10 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.2147/OAEM.S618018
Adane F Wogu, Mengli Xiao, Dale A Barnhart, Sophia Centi, Hendrick Lategan, George Oosthuizen, Craig Wylie, Shaheem de Vries, Janette Verster, Willem Stassen, Mary D Sammel, Steven G Schauer, Julia M Dixon, Nee-Kofi Mould-Millman
{"title":"Shock Index versus Systolic Blood Pressure for Mortality Prediction in Traumatic Hemorrhage: A Comparative Prognostic Evaluation in a Middle-Income Country.","authors":"Adane F Wogu, Mengli Xiao, Dale A Barnhart, Sophia Centi, Hendrick Lategan, George Oosthuizen, Craig Wylie, Shaheem de Vries, Janette Verster, Willem Stassen, Mary D Sammel, Steven G Schauer, Julia M Dixon, Nee-Kofi Mould-Millman","doi":"10.2147/OAEM.S618018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aims to evaluate and compare the prognostic performance of shock index (SI) and systolic blood pressure (SBP) for predicting mortality among trauma patients at risk of hemorrhage in South Africa, a high-trauma burden setting with resource constraints.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>This is a secondary analysis of data from the EpiC study, a prospective, multicenter observational investigation of trauma patients in the Western Cape, South Africa. Adult patients with blunt or penetrating injuries and no significant head injury were included. The predictor variables-SI and SBP at facility arrival-and the outcome (30-day mortality) were analyzed through a sequential analytical framework. Segmented logistic regressions identified inflection points; ROC analyses with Youden's J statistic determined optimal thresholds. Model comparisons employed DeLong's test, calibration plots, Brier scores, and decision curve analysis. Subgroup analyses were conducted by injury mechanism and severity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 3609 patients, 6.1% died within 30 days. SI demonstrated an inflection point at 0.69 and SBP at 82 mmHg. ROC analysis yielded similar AUCs of 0.62 (SI) and 0.60 (SBP) (p=0.418). However, SI showed superior calibration (Brier score: 0.054 vs 0.058), a higher positive likelihood ratio (2.70 vs 2.01; p<0.001), and greater net benefit across a broader range of predicted-risk thresholds on decision curve analysis. The optimal SI cutoff of ≥1.21 yielded 85.1% specificity and 40.3% sensitivity.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Both SI and SBP demonstrated only modest discrimination for 30-day mortality, reflecting the inherent limitations of single vital-sign predictors in complex trauma populations. Within these constraints, SI showed marginally better calibration and rule-in performance than SBP; however, neither predictor alone is sufficient for definitive mortality risk prediction. An SI threshold of ≥1.21 may serve as a practical screening tool to flag high-risk patients warranting closer monitoring or escalated care, particularly in resource-limited settings where laboratory and imaging resources are constrained.</p>","PeriodicalId":45096,"journal":{"name":"Open Access Emergency Medicine","volume":"18 ","pages":"618018"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13367498/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open Access Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/OAEM.S618018","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: This study aims to evaluate and compare the prognostic performance of shock index (SI) and systolic blood pressure (SBP) for predicting mortality among trauma patients at risk of hemorrhage in South Africa, a high-trauma burden setting with resource constraints.

Patients and methods: This is a secondary analysis of data from the EpiC study, a prospective, multicenter observational investigation of trauma patients in the Western Cape, South Africa. Adult patients with blunt or penetrating injuries and no significant head injury were included. The predictor variables-SI and SBP at facility arrival-and the outcome (30-day mortality) were analyzed through a sequential analytical framework. Segmented logistic regressions identified inflection points; ROC analyses with Youden's J statistic determined optimal thresholds. Model comparisons employed DeLong's test, calibration plots, Brier scores, and decision curve analysis. Subgroup analyses were conducted by injury mechanism and severity.

Results: Among 3609 patients, 6.1% died within 30 days. SI demonstrated an inflection point at 0.69 and SBP at 82 mmHg. ROC analysis yielded similar AUCs of 0.62 (SI) and 0.60 (SBP) (p=0.418). However, SI showed superior calibration (Brier score: 0.054 vs 0.058), a higher positive likelihood ratio (2.70 vs 2.01; p<0.001), and greater net benefit across a broader range of predicted-risk thresholds on decision curve analysis. The optimal SI cutoff of ≥1.21 yielded 85.1% specificity and 40.3% sensitivity.

Conclusion: Both SI and SBP demonstrated only modest discrimination for 30-day mortality, reflecting the inherent limitations of single vital-sign predictors in complex trauma populations. Within these constraints, SI showed marginally better calibration and rule-in performance than SBP; however, neither predictor alone is sufficient for definitive mortality risk prediction. An SI threshold of ≥1.21 may serve as a practical screening tool to flag high-risk patients warranting closer monitoring or escalated care, particularly in resource-limited settings where laboratory and imaging resources are constrained.

休克指数与收缩压对外伤性出血死亡率的预测:中等收入国家的比较预后评估。
目的:本研究旨在评估和比较休克指数(SI)和收缩压(SBP)在预测南非有出血风险的创伤患者死亡率方面的预后表现,南非是一个高创伤负担且资源有限的国家。患者和方法:这是对EpiC研究数据的二次分析,这是一项对南非西开普省创伤患者的前瞻性、多中心观察性调查。包括有钝性或穿透性损伤且没有明显头部损伤的成年患者。预测变量-到达设施时的si和收缩压-以及结果(30天死亡率)通过顺序分析框架进行分析。分段逻辑回归识别拐点;用约登J统计量进行ROC分析,确定最佳阈值。模型比较采用DeLong检验、校正图、Brier评分和决策曲线分析。根据损伤机制和严重程度进行亚组分析。结果:3609例患者中,30天内死亡6.1%。SI的拐点为0.69,收缩压为82 mmHg。ROC分析的auc相似,分别为0.62 (SI)和0.60 (SBP) (p=0.418)。然而,SI显示出更好的校准(Brier评分:0.054 vs 0.058),更高的阳性似然比(2.70 vs 2.01)。结论:SI和收缩压对30天死亡率只有适度的区分,反映了单一生命体征预测指标在复杂创伤人群中的固有局限性。在这些限制条件下,SI的校准和规则性能略好于SBP;然而,这两种预测因子都不足以预测最终的死亡风险。SI阈值≥1.21可作为实用的筛查工具,标记需要密切监测或升级护理的高危患者,特别是在实验室和成像资源受限的资源有限的环境中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Open Access Emergency Medicine
Open Access Emergency Medicine EMERGENCY MEDICINE-
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
6.70%
发文量
85
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书