Effectiveness of dry needling combined with exercise therapy versus exercise alone for pain and functional outcomes in knee osteoarthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

IF 3.3 2区 医学 Q2 RHEUMATOLOGY
Therapeutic Advances in Musculoskeletal Disease Pub Date : 2026-07-13 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.1177/1759720X261463350
Muhammad Tayyab, Ameer Afzal Khan, Rahman Syed, Suleman Shah, Mohammed Al Meqbaali, Anfal Khan, Mohammed Al Sinani
{"title":"Effectiveness of dry needling combined with exercise therapy versus exercise alone for pain and functional outcomes in knee osteoarthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.","authors":"Muhammad Tayyab, Ameer Afzal Khan, Rahman Syed, Suleman Shah, Mohammed Al Meqbaali, Anfal Khan, Mohammed Al Sinani","doi":"10.1177/1759720X261463350","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Knee osteoarthritis (KOA) is a leading cause of chronic pain and disability worldwide. Although exercise therapy is the recommended first-line treatment, many patients continue to experience pain and functional limitations. Dry needling (DN) has emerged as a potential adjunct therapy targeting myofascial and neuropathic pain mechanisms.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate the effectiveness of DN combined with exercise therapy compared with exercise therapy alone for pain reduction and functional improvement in patients with KOA.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.</p><p><strong>Data sources and methods: </strong>A systematic search of PubMed, ClinicalTrials.gov, and the Cochrane Library was conducted from inception to October 23, 2025, following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses 2020 guidelines. Studies involving adults with KOA comparing DN plus exercise with exercise alone or sham DN plus exercise were included. The primary outcome was pain intensity (Visual Analog Scale/Numeric Pain Rating Scale), while secondary outcomes included WOMAC scores, neuropathic pain, functional performance, and psychosocial measures. Pooled mean differences (MDs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using a random-effects model. Heterogeneity was assessed with the <i>I</i> <sup>2</sup> statistic, and risk of bias was evaluated using the Cochrane RoB-2 tool.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Six randomized controlled trials involving 453 participants were included. Compared with exercise alone, DN plus exercise significantly reduced pain at 3 months (MD -1.91; 95% CI -2.60 to -1.21; <i>I</i> <sup>2</sup> = 66%). Significant improvements were also observed in WOMAC pain, stiffness, and physical function at short- and mid-term follow-up. Long-term outcomes (6-12 months) showed favorable trends, although CIs were wider.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>DN combined with exercise therapy may offer short- to mid-term improvements in pain and function in patients with KOA compared with exercise alone. However, the evidence is limited by a small number of studies, moderate certainty, and substantial heterogeneity, warranting cautious interpretation. The long-term benefits remain uncertain. <b><i>Trial registration</i>:</b> PROSPERO (Registration ID: (CRD420261285294)).</p>","PeriodicalId":23056,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic Advances in Musculoskeletal Disease","volume":"18 ","pages":"1759720X261463350"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13365652/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Therapeutic Advances in Musculoskeletal Disease","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1759720X261463350","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Knee osteoarthritis (KOA) is a leading cause of chronic pain and disability worldwide. Although exercise therapy is the recommended first-line treatment, many patients continue to experience pain and functional limitations. Dry needling (DN) has emerged as a potential adjunct therapy targeting myofascial and neuropathic pain mechanisms.

Objectives: To evaluate the effectiveness of DN combined with exercise therapy compared with exercise therapy alone for pain reduction and functional improvement in patients with KOA.

Design: Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Data sources and methods: A systematic search of PubMed, ClinicalTrials.gov, and the Cochrane Library was conducted from inception to October 23, 2025, following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses 2020 guidelines. Studies involving adults with KOA comparing DN plus exercise with exercise alone or sham DN plus exercise were included. The primary outcome was pain intensity (Visual Analog Scale/Numeric Pain Rating Scale), while secondary outcomes included WOMAC scores, neuropathic pain, functional performance, and psychosocial measures. Pooled mean differences (MDs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using a random-effects model. Heterogeneity was assessed with the I 2 statistic, and risk of bias was evaluated using the Cochrane RoB-2 tool.

Results: Six randomized controlled trials involving 453 participants were included. Compared with exercise alone, DN plus exercise significantly reduced pain at 3 months (MD -1.91; 95% CI -2.60 to -1.21; I 2 = 66%). Significant improvements were also observed in WOMAC pain, stiffness, and physical function at short- and mid-term follow-up. Long-term outcomes (6-12 months) showed favorable trends, although CIs were wider.

Conclusion: DN combined with exercise therapy may offer short- to mid-term improvements in pain and function in patients with KOA compared with exercise alone. However, the evidence is limited by a small number of studies, moderate certainty, and substantial heterogeneity, warranting cautious interpretation. The long-term benefits remain uncertain. Trial registration: PROSPERO (Registration ID: (CRD420261285294)).

干针联合运动疗法与单独运动治疗膝关节骨关节炎疼痛和功能结果的有效性:随机对照试验的系统回顾和荟萃分析。
背景:膝骨关节炎(KOA)是世界范围内慢性疼痛和残疾的主要原因。虽然运动疗法是推荐的一线治疗方法,但许多患者仍然感到疼痛和功能限制。干针(DN)已成为一种潜在的辅助治疗针对肌筋膜和神经性疼痛机制。目的:评价DN联合运动治疗与单独运动治疗对KOA患者疼痛减轻和功能改善的效果。设计:随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。数据来源和方法:系统检索PubMed、ClinicalTrials.gov和Cochrane图书馆,从成立到2025年10月23日,遵循系统评价和元分析2020指南的首选报告项目。研究对象包括患有KOA的成人,将DN +运动与单纯运动或假性DN +运动进行比较。主要结局是疼痛强度(视觉模拟量表/数字疼痛评定量表),次要结局包括WOMAC评分、神经性疼痛、功能表现和社会心理测量。采用随机效应模型计算95%置信区间(ci)的合并平均差(MDs)。异质性采用i2统计量评估,偏倚风险采用Cochrane rob2工具评估。结果:纳入6项随机对照试验,共纳入453名受试者。与单独运动相比,DN +运动在3个月时显著减轻疼痛(MD -1.91; 95% CI -2.60至-1.21;I 2 = 66%)。在短期和中期随访中也观察到WOMAC疼痛、僵硬和身体功能的显著改善。长期结果(6-12个月)显示出有利趋势,尽管ci范围更广。结论:与单纯运动治疗相比,DN联合运动治疗可使KOA患者的疼痛和功能得到中短期的改善。然而,证据受到少量研究、中等确定性和大量异质性的限制,需要谨慎解释。长期效益仍不确定。试验注册:PROSPERO(注册ID: (CRD420261285294))。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
4.80%
发文量
132
审稿时长
18 weeks
期刊介绍: Therapeutic Advances in Musculoskeletal Disease delivers the highest quality peer-reviewed articles, reviews, and scholarly comment on pioneering efforts and innovative studies across all areas of musculoskeletal disease.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书