Utilizing supplementary high-strength suture tying over a bone bridge enhances the effectiveness of interference screw as tibial fixation method in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

IF 4.4 Q2 Medicine
Alvaro Arriaza, Pablo Miragaya, Juan Mora-Macías, Esther Reina-Romo, Pablo Blázquez-Carmona, Fernando Marco, Rafael Arriaza
{"title":"Utilizing supplementary high-strength suture tying over a bone bridge enhances the effectiveness of interference screw as tibial fixation method in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.","authors":"Alvaro Arriaza, Pablo Miragaya, Juan Mora-Macías, Esther Reina-Romo, Pablo Blázquez-Carmona, Fernando Marco, Rafael Arriaza","doi":"10.1186/s43019-026-00325-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Tibial fixation is the biomechanical weak point in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction, with numerous techniques proposed to address this challenge. This study evaluates the utility of a simple, cost-effective system: high-strength suture tying over a bone bridge (BB). Its effectiveness as standalone fixation and as a supplement to standard interference screw (IS) fixation is compared with IS alone and supplemented with other commercial systems.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A biomechanical study was conducted using six fixation methods tested on 61 specimens with bovine extensor tendons in porcine tibial models. Groups included BB alone, IS alone, and four hybrid fixation methods: IS + BB, IS + a cortical screw post (CSP), IS + a PushLock<sup>®</sup> anchor, and IS + a SwiveLock<sup>®</sup> anchor, with at least nine specimens per group. Specimens underwent cyclic load testing (500 cycles at 100-200 N) and pull-to-failure tests (20 mm/min) to measure displacement, ultimate load to failure, and stiffness.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Standalone BB fixation showed limited performance, with an ultimate load to failure of 357.81 ± 90.53 N and cyclic displacement of 14.88 ± 3.28 mm, insufficient for early rehabilitation. When combined with IS, BB significantly improved performance, achieving an ultimate load to failure of 500.55 ± 151.24 N, comparable to commercial systems, and reducing cyclic displacement to 4.82 ± 0.83 mm. Hybrid fixation methods lowered early failure rates to 10%, compared with 30-40% in single-method fixations, confirming enhanced stability.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Hybrid fixation methods are more reliable than simple ones for tibial fixation. Combining IS with BB provides a biomechanically robust and cost-effective solution for ACL reconstruction. This simple, ecological and affordable method reduces early failure rates, minimizes cyclic displacement, and achieves outcomes comparable to commercial systems, offering a practical choice for improving ACL repair outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":36317,"journal":{"name":"Knee Surgery and Related Research","volume":"38 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13366730/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Knee Surgery and Related Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s43019-026-00325-5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Tibial fixation is the biomechanical weak point in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction, with numerous techniques proposed to address this challenge. This study evaluates the utility of a simple, cost-effective system: high-strength suture tying over a bone bridge (BB). Its effectiveness as standalone fixation and as a supplement to standard interference screw (IS) fixation is compared with IS alone and supplemented with other commercial systems.

Methods: A biomechanical study was conducted using six fixation methods tested on 61 specimens with bovine extensor tendons in porcine tibial models. Groups included BB alone, IS alone, and four hybrid fixation methods: IS + BB, IS + a cortical screw post (CSP), IS + a PushLock® anchor, and IS + a SwiveLock® anchor, with at least nine specimens per group. Specimens underwent cyclic load testing (500 cycles at 100-200 N) and pull-to-failure tests (20 mm/min) to measure displacement, ultimate load to failure, and stiffness.

Results: Standalone BB fixation showed limited performance, with an ultimate load to failure of 357.81 ± 90.53 N and cyclic displacement of 14.88 ± 3.28 mm, insufficient for early rehabilitation. When combined with IS, BB significantly improved performance, achieving an ultimate load to failure of 500.55 ± 151.24 N, comparable to commercial systems, and reducing cyclic displacement to 4.82 ± 0.83 mm. Hybrid fixation methods lowered early failure rates to 10%, compared with 30-40% in single-method fixations, confirming enhanced stability.

Conclusions: Hybrid fixation methods are more reliable than simple ones for tibial fixation. Combining IS with BB provides a biomechanically robust and cost-effective solution for ACL reconstruction. This simple, ecological and affordable method reduces early failure rates, minimizes cyclic displacement, and achieves outcomes comparable to commercial systems, offering a practical choice for improving ACL repair outcomes.

在骨桥上使用辅助高强度缝线系扎可提高干涉螺钉作为胫骨前交叉韧带重建固定方法的有效性。
背景:胫骨固定是前交叉韧带(ACL)重建的生物力学弱点,有许多技术被提出来解决这一挑战。本研究评估了一种简单、经济的系统的效用:骨桥(BB)上的高强度缝合。将其作为独立固定和标准干涉螺钉(IS)固定的补充的有效性与IS单独固定和与其他商业系统的补充进行了比较。方法:采用6种固定方法对61例猪胫骨模型牛伸肌腱进行生物力学研究。各组包括单独BB、单独IS和四种混合固定方法:IS + BB、IS +皮质螺钉桩(CSP)、IS + PushLock®锚和IS + SwiveLock®锚,每组至少9个标本。试样进行了循环载荷试验(100-200 N, 500次循环)和拉至破坏试验(20 mm/min),以测量位移、极限破坏载荷和刚度。结果:独立BB固定性能有限,最终失效载荷为357.81±90.53 N,循环位移为14.88±3.28 mm,不足以早期康复。当与IS结合使用时,BB显著提高了性能,达到了500.55±151.24 N的极限载荷,与商用系统相当,并将循环位移减少到4.82±0.83 mm。与单一固定方法30-40%相比,混合固定方法将早期失败率降低至10%,证实了增强的稳定性。结论:混合固定方法比单一固定方法更可靠。结合IS和BB为ACL重建提供了生物力学上稳健和经济的解决方案。这种简单、环保、经济的方法降低了早期故障率,最大限度地减少了循环位移,并达到了与商业系统相当的效果,为改善ACL修复效果提供了实用的选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
42
审稿时长
19 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书