Decision-Making and Family Planning among People with Clinical Depressiveness-Findings from a Representative German Panel Study.

IF 3.9 3区 医学 Q2 DEMOGRAPHY
Studies in Family Planning Pub Date : 2026-09-01 Epub Date: 2026-07-15 DOI:10.1111/sifp.70060
Marie Lehnert, Tanja Gabriele Baudson, Doris Erbe
{"title":"Decision-Making and Family Planning among People with Clinical Depressiveness-Findings from a Representative German Panel Study.","authors":"Marie Lehnert, Tanja Gabriele Baudson, Doris Erbe","doi":"10.1111/sifp.70060","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Personally important decisions, like reproductive choices, may be challenging for individuals with clinical depressiveness, as indecisiveness is a common depressive symptom. This study examines whether decision-making modes related to reproductive behavior differ between individuals with and without clinical depressiveness (H1) and whether these modes remain stable over time, even after the birth of the first child (H2). Data stem from the German Panel Analysis of Intimate Relationships and Family Dynamics (pairfam). Clinical depressiveness was measured using State-Trait Depression Scales and decision-making modes through items on reproductive behavior. H1 was analyzed using multivariate analysis of covariance (MANCOVA) and post hoc analysis of variance (ANOVA); H2 via fixed-effect regressions and cross-lagged panel model. A significant group difference emerged in the combined decision-making modes (Pillai's trace = 0.009, F(6, 4832) = 7.32, p < 0.001). Individuals with clinical depressiveness engaged more in rational and avoidant modes, whereas those without favored normative decision-making. Decision-making remained stable between subjects; within-subject analyses showed alterations over time. Between subjects, decision-making remained stable. Characteristics of depressive symptoms and individual circumstances may explain the results. Future research should incorporate other clinical conditions and qualitative analyses. Practitioners should consider individual costs, benefits, and decisional postponement.</p>","PeriodicalId":22069,"journal":{"name":"Studies in Family Planning","volume":" ","pages":"415-431"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13578845/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studies in Family Planning","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/sifp.70060","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/7/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DEMOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Personally important decisions, like reproductive choices, may be challenging for individuals with clinical depressiveness, as indecisiveness is a common depressive symptom. This study examines whether decision-making modes related to reproductive behavior differ between individuals with and without clinical depressiveness (H1) and whether these modes remain stable over time, even after the birth of the first child (H2). Data stem from the German Panel Analysis of Intimate Relationships and Family Dynamics (pairfam). Clinical depressiveness was measured using State-Trait Depression Scales and decision-making modes through items on reproductive behavior. H1 was analyzed using multivariate analysis of covariance (MANCOVA) and post hoc analysis of variance (ANOVA); H2 via fixed-effect regressions and cross-lagged panel model. A significant group difference emerged in the combined decision-making modes (Pillai's trace = 0.009, F(6, 4832) = 7.32, p < 0.001). Individuals with clinical depressiveness engaged more in rational and avoidant modes, whereas those without favored normative decision-making. Decision-making remained stable between subjects; within-subject analyses showed alterations over time. Between subjects, decision-making remained stable. Characteristics of depressive symptoms and individual circumstances may explain the results. Future research should incorporate other clinical conditions and qualitative analyses. Practitioners should consider individual costs, benefits, and decisional postponement.

临床抑郁症患者的决策和计划生育——来自一项具有代表性的德国小组研究的结果。
就个人而言,重要的决定,比如生育选择,对临床抑郁症患者来说可能是一个挑战,因为优柔寡断是一种常见的抑郁症状。本研究探讨了与生殖行为相关的决策模式在患有和没有临床抑郁症的个体之间是否存在差异(H1),以及这些模式是否随着时间的推移保持稳定,甚至在第一个孩子出生后(H2)。数据来源于德国亲密关系和家庭动态面板分析(pairfam)。临床抑郁程度采用状态-特质抑郁量表,决策模式采用生殖行为项目。采用多变量协方差分析(MANCOVA)和事后方差分析(ANOVA)分析H1;H2通过固定效应回归和交叉滞后面板模型。组合决策模式组间差异显著(Pillai’s trace = 0.009, F(6,4832) = 7.32, p < 0.001)。患有临床抑郁症的个体更倾向于理性和回避模式,而没有临床抑郁症的个体则倾向于规范性决策。受试者之间的决策保持稳定;受试者内部分析显示出随时间的变化。受试者之间的决策保持稳定。抑郁症状的特征和个体情况可以解释这些结果。未来的研究应纳入其他临床条件和定性分析。从业者应该考虑个体成本、收益和决策延迟。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
9.50%
发文量
35
期刊介绍: Studies in Family Planning publishes public health, social science, and biomedical research concerning sexual and reproductive health, fertility, and family planning, with a primary focus on developing countries. Each issue contains original research articles, reports, a commentary, book reviews, and a data section with findings for individual countries from the Demographic and Health Surveys.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书