Integrating bottom-up and top-down Competency modeling: Mapping the U.S. Air Force Foundational Competencies across Occupations.

IF 1.7 4区 心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Laura G Barron, Vincent C Villanueva, Jamal S Qaiyyim, Gordon W Ringler
{"title":"Integrating bottom-up and top-down Competency modeling: Mapping the U.S. Air Force Foundational Competencies across Occupations.","authors":"Laura G Barron, Vincent C Villanueva, Jamal S Qaiyyim, Gordon W Ringler","doi":"10.1080/08995605.2026.2702679","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In 2018, senior leadership within the U.S. Air Force's Air Education & Training Command directed a shift to competency-based learning and force development, and introduced a new office tasked to develop, validate, assess, and integrate competencies Air Force-wide. This included two separate initiatives: (1) a top-down process focused on Foundational Competencies, which were intended to be applicable across all Air Force career fields, and (2) a bottom-up process of developing discrete Occupational Competency models one career field at a time. In an effort to merge the two, and more broadly develop Air Force members, a focus group and survey process was introduced in which career field members attempt to map each of their individual Occupational Competencies back to the common dictionary of Foundational Competencies (\"Supporting Competencies\"), with the opportunity to propose other \"Supporting Competencies\" if needed. This paper describes and summarizes the results of this effort across 110 Air Force occupations (total <i>n</i> = 18,822 survey respondents), and identifies Foundational Competencies that received the most support as widely applicable across career fields, as a complementary source of information to validate and refine the Foundational Competencies. Overall, across 110 diverse Air Force occupations individually surveyed, Communication, Accountability, Analytical Thinking, and Decision Making were consistently rated among the top supporting competencies; Organizational Awareness, Relationship Building, and Strategic Thinking were more highly rated for officers than for enlisted occupations. Although the results show continued, widespread applicability of many Foundational Competencies, results also suggest potential opportunities for refinement.</p>","PeriodicalId":18696,"journal":{"name":"Military Psychology","volume":" ","pages":"1-18"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Military Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08995605.2026.2702679","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In 2018, senior leadership within the U.S. Air Force's Air Education & Training Command directed a shift to competency-based learning and force development, and introduced a new office tasked to develop, validate, assess, and integrate competencies Air Force-wide. This included two separate initiatives: (1) a top-down process focused on Foundational Competencies, which were intended to be applicable across all Air Force career fields, and (2) a bottom-up process of developing discrete Occupational Competency models one career field at a time. In an effort to merge the two, and more broadly develop Air Force members, a focus group and survey process was introduced in which career field members attempt to map each of their individual Occupational Competencies back to the common dictionary of Foundational Competencies ("Supporting Competencies"), with the opportunity to propose other "Supporting Competencies" if needed. This paper describes and summarizes the results of this effort across 110 Air Force occupations (total n = 18,822 survey respondents), and identifies Foundational Competencies that received the most support as widely applicable across career fields, as a complementary source of information to validate and refine the Foundational Competencies. Overall, across 110 diverse Air Force occupations individually surveyed, Communication, Accountability, Analytical Thinking, and Decision Making were consistently rated among the top supporting competencies; Organizational Awareness, Relationship Building, and Strategic Thinking were more highly rated for officers than for enlisted occupations. Although the results show continued, widespread applicability of many Foundational Competencies, results also suggest potential opportunities for refinement.

整合自底向上和自顶向下的能力建模:绘制美国空军跨职业的基本能力。
2018年,美国空军空军教育与训练司令部的高级领导层指示向以能力为基础的学习和力量发展转变,并设立了一个新的办公室,负责开发、验证、评估和整合整个空军的能力。这包括两个独立的举措:(1)自上而下的过程,重点是基础能力,旨在适用于所有空军职业领域;(2)自下而上的过程,每次开发一个职业领域的离散职业能力模型。为了将两者合并,并更广泛地发展空军成员,引入了一个焦点小组和调查过程,在这个过程中,职业领域的成员试图将他们的每个个人职业能力映射回基础能力的通用字典(“支持能力”),并有机会在需要时提出其他“支持能力”。本文描述并总结了110个空军职业(总n = 18,822名调查受访者)的这项工作的结果,并确定了获得最多支持的基础能力,广泛适用于各个职业领域,作为验证和完善基础能力的补充信息来源。总体而言,在单独调查的110种不同的空军职业中,沟通、问责、分析思维和决策一直被评为最重要的支持能力;在组织意识、关系建立和战略思维方面,军官的得分高于士兵。尽管结果显示了许多基础能力的持续、广泛的适用性,但结果也表明了改进的潜在机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Military Psychology
Military Psychology PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
18.20%
发文量
80
期刊介绍: Military Psychology is the quarterly journal of Division 19 (Society for Military Psychology) of the American Psychological Association. The journal seeks to facilitate the scientific development of military psychology by encouraging communication between researchers and practitioners. The domain of military psychology is the conduct of research or practice of psychological principles within a military environment. The journal publishes behavioral science research articles having military applications in the areas of clinical and health psychology, training and human factors, manpower and personnel, social and organizational systems, and testing and measurement.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书