Setting expectations for current and future directions of native mass spectrometry in the biopharmaceutical industry.

IF 7.9 2区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
mAbs Pub Date : 2026-12-01 Epub Date: 2026-07-15 DOI:10.1080/19420862.2026.2699078
Elizabeth Hecht, Esther Martin, Idlir Liko, Andrew Mahan, Aniruddha Sahasrabuddhe, Nastaran N Tajoddin, Iain D G Campuzano
{"title":"Setting expectations for current and future directions of native mass spectrometry in the biopharmaceutical industry.","authors":"Elizabeth Hecht, Esther Martin, Idlir Liko, Andrew Mahan, Aniruddha Sahasrabuddhe, Nastaran N Tajoddin, Iain D G Campuzano","doi":"10.1080/19420862.2026.2699078","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>While native mass spectrometry (native-MS) has been widely explored in academic laboratories, its practical role within biopharmaceutical research remains less clearly defined. In this perspective, we present an industry-driven view of how native-MS is currently applied, where it offers unique advantages over established analytical technologies, and where alternative methods remain more practical for routine characterization. Within biopharma workflows, characterization strategies traditionally rely on orthogonal techniques such as size-exclusion chromatography (SEC), ion-exchange chromatography (IEX), electrophoresis, light scattering, calorimetry, and denaturing liquid chromatography (LC) MS. Native-MS complements these methods by enabling direct assessment of intact molecular assemblies, including monoclonal antibodies (mAbs), multispecific antibodies, antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs), glycoproteins, and protein complexes. Applications include evaluation of higher-order assembly, ligand or cofactor binding, stoichiometry of target complexes, and heterogeneity that may be obscured under denaturing conditions. However, challenges related to throughput, sensitivity, automation, and accessibility have limited widespread adoption in industrial laboratories. Emerging developments, including chromatographic hyphenation, online buffer exchange (OBE), improved automation, and charge-detection MS (CDMS), are beginning to address these constraints. We argue that the future impact of native-MS in biopharma will depend on integrating these technological advances with platformed analytical workflows and software capable of supporting high-throughput characterization across therapeutic pipelines. We hope that the ideas raised in this article spur debate on when, how, and if native-MS would or should see increased adoption.</p>","PeriodicalId":18206,"journal":{"name":"mAbs","volume":"18 1","pages":"2699078"},"PeriodicalIF":7.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13374778/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"mAbs","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/19420862.2026.2699078","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/7/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

While native mass spectrometry (native-MS) has been widely explored in academic laboratories, its practical role within biopharmaceutical research remains less clearly defined. In this perspective, we present an industry-driven view of how native-MS is currently applied, where it offers unique advantages over established analytical technologies, and where alternative methods remain more practical for routine characterization. Within biopharma workflows, characterization strategies traditionally rely on orthogonal techniques such as size-exclusion chromatography (SEC), ion-exchange chromatography (IEX), electrophoresis, light scattering, calorimetry, and denaturing liquid chromatography (LC) MS. Native-MS complements these methods by enabling direct assessment of intact molecular assemblies, including monoclonal antibodies (mAbs), multispecific antibodies, antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs), glycoproteins, and protein complexes. Applications include evaluation of higher-order assembly, ligand or cofactor binding, stoichiometry of target complexes, and heterogeneity that may be obscured under denaturing conditions. However, challenges related to throughput, sensitivity, automation, and accessibility have limited widespread adoption in industrial laboratories. Emerging developments, including chromatographic hyphenation, online buffer exchange (OBE), improved automation, and charge-detection MS (CDMS), are beginning to address these constraints. We argue that the future impact of native-MS in biopharma will depend on integrating these technological advances with platformed analytical workflows and software capable of supporting high-throughput characterization across therapeutic pipelines. We hope that the ideas raised in this article spur debate on when, how, and if native-MS would or should see increased adoption.

为生物制药行业的原生质谱法的当前和未来方向设定期望。
虽然原生质谱(native- ms)在学术实验室中得到了广泛的探索,但它在生物制药研究中的实际作用仍然不太明确。从这个角度来看,我们提出了一个行业驱动的观点,即原生质谱目前是如何应用的,它比现有的分析技术提供了独特的优势,并且替代方法对于常规表征仍然更实用。在生物制药工作流程中,表征策略传统上依赖于正交技术,如尺寸排除色谱(SEC)、离子交换色谱(IEX)、电泳、光散射、量热法和变性液相色谱(LC) ms。Native-MS通过直接评估完整的分子组合,包括单克隆抗体(mab)、多特异性抗体、抗体-药物偶联物(adc)、糖蛋白、还有蛋白质复合物。应用包括评估高阶组装,配体或辅因子结合,目标配合物的化学计量学,以及在变性条件下可能被掩盖的异质性。然而,与吞吐量、灵敏度、自动化和可及性相关的挑战限制了工业实验室的广泛采用。包括色谱连字符、在线缓冲交换(OBE)、改进的自动化和电荷检测质谱(CDMS)在内的新兴发展正在开始解决这些限制。我们认为,原生质谱在生物制药领域的未来影响将取决于将这些技术进步与平台分析工作流程和能够支持跨治疗管道高通量表征的软件相结合。我们希望本文中提出的观点能够激发关于何时、如何以及是否应该或应该增加采用native-MS的辩论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
mAbs
mAbs 工程技术-仪器仪表
CiteScore
10.70
自引率
11.30%
发文量
77
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: mAbs is a multi-disciplinary journal dedicated to the art and science of antibody research and development. The journal has a strong scientific and medical focus, but also strives to serve a broader readership. The articles are thus of interest to scientists, clinical researchers, and physicians, as well as the wider mAb community, including our readers involved in technology transfer, legal issues, investment, strategic planning and the regulation of therapeutics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书