Aki Sasaki, Tomoki Kuribara, Takeshi Unoki, Junpei Haruna, Hiroomi Tatsumi
{"title":"Previous-day physical restraint duration as a bedside signal for following-day delirium: a retrospective patient-day analysis in a mixed ICU.","authors":"Aki Sasaki, Tomoki Kuribara, Takeshi Unoki, Junpei Haruna, Hiroomi Tatsumi","doi":"10.1186/s40560-026-00910-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Delirium is common in the intensive care unit and associated with adverse outcomes. However, bedside indicators that flag patients at high risk for delirium the following day are lacking. Although physical restraint has been linked to delirium, many prior studies relied on cross-sectional, same-day assessments that cannot exclude reverse causation. This study aimed to evaluate whether cumulative previous-day physical restraint duration was a bedside signal for following-day delirium.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a single-center retrospective observational cohort study using patient-days (00:00-24:00 h) as the unit of analysis, with the exposure and covariates derived from more granular, time-stamped nursing records aggregated into calendar-day units. The exposure was cumulative physical restraint duration on the previous day, reported per 8-h increase. The outcome was incident delirium on the following day, defined as an Intensive Care Delirium Screening Checklist (ICDSC) score ≥ 4. The primary analysis was restricted to patient-days without previous-day delirium (ICDSC 0-3). We fitted a generalized linear mixed model with a random intercept for each patient. The restraint duration was modeled using a natural cubic spline (degrees of freedom = 3).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 1,482 patient-days from 281 patients, 263 patient-days were excluded due to coma. The primary analysis included 729 patient-days from 247 patients without previous-day delirium (115 incident delirium events, 15.8%). The association between restraint duration and following-day incident delirium was non-linear (likelihood ratio test, P < 0.001). Using no restraint as the reference, the odds ratios were 2.43 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.64-3.61) at 8 h, 5.16 (95% CI 3.39-7.85) at 16 h, and 10.01 (95% CI 6.31-15.88) at 24 h. Sensitivity analyses using complete-case analysis, last observation carried forward, best-case/worst-case extreme scenarios, and adjustment for previous-day mental status yielded consistent results.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this single-center cohort, longer restraint duration on the previous day was associated with a higher risk of incident delirium the following day and may serve as a bedside-observable signal rather than evidence of a causal effect. Residual confounding may remain; prospective observational studies are needed to confirm this signal before its clinical utility is evaluated.</p>","PeriodicalId":16123,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Intensive Care","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13520223/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Intensive Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40560-026-00910-6","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Delirium is common in the intensive care unit and associated with adverse outcomes. However, bedside indicators that flag patients at high risk for delirium the following day are lacking. Although physical restraint has been linked to delirium, many prior studies relied on cross-sectional, same-day assessments that cannot exclude reverse causation. This study aimed to evaluate whether cumulative previous-day physical restraint duration was a bedside signal for following-day delirium.
Methods: We conducted a single-center retrospective observational cohort study using patient-days (00:00-24:00 h) as the unit of analysis, with the exposure and covariates derived from more granular, time-stamped nursing records aggregated into calendar-day units. The exposure was cumulative physical restraint duration on the previous day, reported per 8-h increase. The outcome was incident delirium on the following day, defined as an Intensive Care Delirium Screening Checklist (ICDSC) score ≥ 4. The primary analysis was restricted to patient-days without previous-day delirium (ICDSC 0-3). We fitted a generalized linear mixed model with a random intercept for each patient. The restraint duration was modeled using a natural cubic spline (degrees of freedom = 3).
Results: Of 1,482 patient-days from 281 patients, 263 patient-days were excluded due to coma. The primary analysis included 729 patient-days from 247 patients without previous-day delirium (115 incident delirium events, 15.8%). The association between restraint duration and following-day incident delirium was non-linear (likelihood ratio test, P < 0.001). Using no restraint as the reference, the odds ratios were 2.43 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.64-3.61) at 8 h, 5.16 (95% CI 3.39-7.85) at 16 h, and 10.01 (95% CI 6.31-15.88) at 24 h. Sensitivity analyses using complete-case analysis, last observation carried forward, best-case/worst-case extreme scenarios, and adjustment for previous-day mental status yielded consistent results.
Conclusions: In this single-center cohort, longer restraint duration on the previous day was associated with a higher risk of incident delirium the following day and may serve as a bedside-observable signal rather than evidence of a causal effect. Residual confounding may remain; prospective observational studies are needed to confirm this signal before its clinical utility is evaluated.
期刊介绍:
"Journal of Intensive Care" is an open access journal dedicated to the comprehensive coverage of intensive care medicine, providing a platform for the latest research and clinical insights in this critical field. The journal covers a wide range of topics, including intensive and critical care, trauma and surgical intensive care, pediatric intensive care, acute and emergency medicine, perioperative medicine, resuscitation, infection control, and organ dysfunction.
Recognizing the importance of cultural diversity in healthcare practices, "Journal of Intensive Care" also encourages submissions that explore and discuss the cultural aspects of intensive care, aiming to promote a more inclusive and culturally sensitive approach to patient care. By fostering a global exchange of knowledge and expertise, the journal contributes to the continuous improvement of intensive care practices worldwide.