Beyond clinical congestion in acute heart failure: integrating lung ultrasound, venous doppler, and echocardiographic hemodynamics for imaging-guided decongestion.

IF 5.3 2区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Muzamil Yousuf Lone, Sivadasanpillai Harikrishnan
{"title":"Beyond clinical congestion in acute heart failure: integrating lung ultrasound, venous doppler, and echocardiographic hemodynamics for imaging-guided decongestion.","authors":"Muzamil Yousuf Lone, Sivadasanpillai Harikrishnan","doi":"10.1007/s10741-026-10658-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Acute heart failure (AHF) is a major cause of hospitalisation worldwide and remains associated with substantial early rehospitalisation and short-term mortality. Accurate assessment of congestion remains challenging because symptoms, physical signs, body weight, and conventional biomarkers may not fully capture the severity, distribution, or persistence of haemodynamic congestion. This limitation contributes to incomplete decongestion and may partly explain recurrent decompensation after discharge. In this review, we examine the complementary roles of three point-of-care ultrasound modalities in residual congestion assessment: lung ultrasound for pulmonary congestion, venous Doppler/VExUS for systemic venous and end-organ congestion, and focused transthoracic echocardiography for cardiac and haemodynamic profiling. We propose the ICON (Integrated Congestion-Oriented Navigation) framework as a pragmatic bedside model that translates these modalities into a three-phase acute heart failure workflow: initial assessment, inpatient monitoring, and predischarge reassessment. Within this workflow, ICON supports phenotype-based interpretation of residual congestion, including pulmonary-dominant, systemic venous/RV-dominant, mixed, cold-wet/low-output, and near-decongested profiles. Current evidence supports the prognostic value of residual congestion and suggests that ultrasound-guided strategies may improve congestion assessment, but the evidence remains heterogeneous. The ICON framework should therefore be viewed as a proposed physiology-based model requiring prospective validation before adoption as a standard-of-care pathway.</p>","PeriodicalId":12950,"journal":{"name":"Heart Failure Reviews","volume":"31 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Heart Failure Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10741-026-10658-8","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Acute heart failure (AHF) is a major cause of hospitalisation worldwide and remains associated with substantial early rehospitalisation and short-term mortality. Accurate assessment of congestion remains challenging because symptoms, physical signs, body weight, and conventional biomarkers may not fully capture the severity, distribution, or persistence of haemodynamic congestion. This limitation contributes to incomplete decongestion and may partly explain recurrent decompensation after discharge. In this review, we examine the complementary roles of three point-of-care ultrasound modalities in residual congestion assessment: lung ultrasound for pulmonary congestion, venous Doppler/VExUS for systemic venous and end-organ congestion, and focused transthoracic echocardiography for cardiac and haemodynamic profiling. We propose the ICON (Integrated Congestion-Oriented Navigation) framework as a pragmatic bedside model that translates these modalities into a three-phase acute heart failure workflow: initial assessment, inpatient monitoring, and predischarge reassessment. Within this workflow, ICON supports phenotype-based interpretation of residual congestion, including pulmonary-dominant, systemic venous/RV-dominant, mixed, cold-wet/low-output, and near-decongested profiles. Current evidence supports the prognostic value of residual congestion and suggests that ultrasound-guided strategies may improve congestion assessment, but the evidence remains heterogeneous. The ICON framework should therefore be viewed as a proposed physiology-based model requiring prospective validation before adoption as a standard-of-care pathway.

超越急性心力衰竭的临床充血:整合肺部超声、静脉多普勒和超声心动图血流动力学在影像引导下去充血。
急性心力衰竭(AHF)是世界范围内住院的主要原因,并且仍然与大量的早期再住院和短期死亡率相关。由于症状、体征、体重和传统的生物标志物可能无法完全捕捉血流动力学充血的严重程度、分布或持续时间,因此对充血的准确评估仍然具有挑战性。这种限制有助于不完全的去充血,并可能部分解释出院后复发性失代偿。在本文中,我们检查三个医疗点超声波模式的互补角色残余拥堵评价:肺超声对肺充血,静脉多普勒/ VExUS系统性静脉和终末器官充血,超音波检查发现,心脏和血液动力学的分析。我们提出ICON(综合拥堵导向导航)框架作为一个实用的床边模型,将这些模式转化为三个阶段的急性心力衰竭工作流程:初始评估、住院监测和出院前再评估。在此工作流程中,ICON支持基于表型的残余充血解释,包括肺主导型、全身静脉/静脉主导型、混合型、冷湿型/低输出型和近去充血型。目前的证据支持剩余充血的预后价值,并表明超声引导策略可以改善充血评估,但证据仍然不一致。因此,ICON框架应被视为一种拟议的基于生理的模型,需要在作为标准治疗途径采用之前进行前瞻性验证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Heart Failure Reviews
Heart Failure Reviews 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
10.40
自引率
2.20%
发文量
90
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Heart Failure Reviews is an international journal which develops links between basic scientists and clinical investigators, creating a unique, interdisciplinary dialogue focused on heart failure, its pathogenesis and treatment. The journal accordingly publishes papers in both basic and clinical research fields. Topics covered include clinical and surgical approaches to therapy, basic pharmacology, biochemistry, molecular biology, pathology, and electrophysiology. The reviews are comprehensive, expanding the reader''s knowledge base and awareness of current research and new findings in this rapidly growing field of cardiovascular medicine. All reviews are thoroughly peer-reviewed before publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书