Periconceptional use of GLP-1 receptor agonists and the risk of major congenital malformations: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q3 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Xiangxian Liu, Beijia Xiong, Rui Yang, Haining Wang, Ye Liu
{"title":"Periconceptional use of GLP-1 receptor agonists and the risk of major congenital malformations: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Xiangxian Liu, Beijia Xiong, Rui Yang, Haining Wang, Ye Liu","doi":"10.1530/EC-26-0280","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) are widely used for metabolic diseases, but their reproductive safety remains controversial. We assessed the impact of periconceptional GLP-1RA exposure on birth outcomes to inform their use in reproductive-aged women. PubMed, Embase, Web of Science (through December 2025) were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs)/cohorts reporting offspring or pregnancy outcomes in women exposed to GLP-1RAs within three months before conception or during pregnancy. The primary outcome was major congenital malformations (MCMs), compared between neonates with or without maternal GLP-1RA exposure. Secondary outcomes were spontaneous abortion, stillbirth, preterm birth, large for gestational age (LGA), and small for gestational age (SGA). One prospective and five retrospective studies involving 286,599 women (43,577 exposed and 243,022 unexposed to GLP-1RAs) were included. Meta-analysis showed no significant difference in MCM risk in the GLP-1RA exposure group, compared with the non-exposure group (relative risk (RR): 1.02, 95% CI: 0.96-1.08). Risks of preterm birth (RR: 1.09, 95% CI: 0.80-1.49), LGA (RR: 2.31, 95% CI: 0.56-9.44), SGA (RR: 0.71, 95% CI: 0.39-1.27), and stillbirth (RR: 1.16, 95% CI: 0.24-5.69) were not significantly elevated. The incidence of spontaneous abortion was comparable between the two groups in one study. Evidence suggests that periconceptional GLP-1RA exposure in women is not associated with an increased risk of MCMs or other adverse birth outcomes. However, given the observational design and limited exposed pregnancies, these findings should not be interpreted as proof of safety. Large prospective cohorts and RCTs are needed to confirm the safety of GLP-1RA usage before pregnancy.</p>","PeriodicalId":11634,"journal":{"name":"Endocrine Connections","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13386145/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Endocrine Connections","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1530/EC-26-0280","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) are widely used for metabolic diseases, but their reproductive safety remains controversial. We assessed the impact of periconceptional GLP-1RA exposure on birth outcomes to inform their use in reproductive-aged women. PubMed, Embase, Web of Science (through December 2025) were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs)/cohorts reporting offspring or pregnancy outcomes in women exposed to GLP-1RAs within three months before conception or during pregnancy. The primary outcome was major congenital malformations (MCMs), compared between neonates with or without maternal GLP-1RA exposure. Secondary outcomes were spontaneous abortion, stillbirth, preterm birth, large for gestational age (LGA), and small for gestational age (SGA). One prospective and five retrospective studies involving 286,599 women (43,577 exposed and 243,022 unexposed to GLP-1RAs) were included. Meta-analysis showed no significant difference in MCM risk in the GLP-1RA exposure group, compared with the non-exposure group (relative risk (RR): 1.02, 95% CI: 0.96-1.08). Risks of preterm birth (RR: 1.09, 95% CI: 0.80-1.49), LGA (RR: 2.31, 95% CI: 0.56-9.44), SGA (RR: 0.71, 95% CI: 0.39-1.27), and stillbirth (RR: 1.16, 95% CI: 0.24-5.69) were not significantly elevated. The incidence of spontaneous abortion was comparable between the two groups in one study. Evidence suggests that periconceptional GLP-1RA exposure in women is not associated with an increased risk of MCMs or other adverse birth outcomes. However, given the observational design and limited exposed pregnancies, these findings should not be interpreted as proof of safety. Large prospective cohorts and RCTs are needed to confirm the safety of GLP-1RA usage before pregnancy.

妊娠期使用GLP-1受体激动剂和主要先天性畸形的风险:系统回顾和荟萃分析。
胰高血糖素样肽-1受体激动剂(GLP-1RAs)广泛用于代谢性疾病,但其生殖安全性仍存在争议。我们评估了围孕期GLP-1RAs暴露对分娩结果的影响,以告知其在育龄妇女中的应用。PubMed, Embase, Web of Science(截至2025年12月)检索了报告在受孕前三个月内或怀孕期间暴露于GLP-1RAs的妇女的后代或妊娠结局的rct /队列。比较暴露于或未暴露于GLP-1RAs的新生儿的主要结局是严重先天性畸形(mcm)。次要结局为自然流产、死胎、早产、大胎龄(LGA)和小胎龄(SGA)。纳入1项前瞻性研究和5项回顾性研究,涉及286599名女性(43577名暴露于GLP-1RAs, 243022名未暴露于GLP-1RAs)。荟萃分析显示,与未暴露组相比,GLP-1RAs暴露组mcm风险无显著差异(相对危险度[RR] 1.02, 95% CI 0.96-1.08)。早产(RR 1.09, 95% CI 0.80-1.49)、LGA (RR 2.31, 95% CI 0.56-9.44)、SGA (RR 0.71, 95% CI 0.39-1.27)和死胎(RR 1.16, 95% CI 0.24-5.69)的风险均未显著升高。在一项研究中,两组自然流产的发生率相当。有证据表明,妊娠期GLP-1RAs暴露与mcm或其他不良分娩结局的风险增加无关。但考虑到观察设计和有限的暴露妊娠,这些发现不应被解释为安全性的证据。需要大量的前瞻性队列和随机对照试验来确认妊娠前使用GLP-1RAs的安全性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Endocrine Connections
Endocrine Connections Medicine-Internal Medicine
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
3.40%
发文量
361
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊介绍: Endocrine Connections publishes original quality research and reviews in all areas of endocrinology, including papers that deal with non-classical tissues as source or targets of hormones and endocrine papers that have relevance to endocrine-related and intersecting disciplines and the wider biomedical community.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书