Measuring bio-psycho-social frailty in older adults across multiple surveys and indicators: evidence from Italy for public health policy.

IF 5.2 3区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Tommaso Aicardi, Elisabetta Listorti, Benedetta Pongiglione
{"title":"Measuring bio-psycho-social frailty in older adults across multiple surveys and indicators: evidence from Italy for public health policy.","authors":"Tommaso Aicardi, Elisabetta Listorti, Benedetta Pongiglione","doi":"10.1093/eurpub/ckag120","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Detecting and measuring frailty is essential to inform health policy. Numerous frailty tools exist, but their application to population data remains limited. This study focuses on Italy and adopts a policymaker's perspective to identify practical, nationally applicable tools for bio-psycho-social frailty assessment using existing survey data. Three validated bio-psycho-social indicators-the Tilburg Frailty Indicator (TFI), the Groningen Frailty Indicator (GFI), and the Edmonton Frail Scale (EFS)-were operationalized across four population surveys (SHARE, EU-SILC, EHIS, and AVQ). The study proceeded in three steps: (i) reconstruction of each indicator within each dataset to assess items' replicability; (ii) validation of reproducible indicators by examining their psychometric properties; (iii) comparison of prevalence and predictive validity across indicators to illustrate their relative strengths and limitations. The GFI was the most replicable across surveys, while the EFS showed the strongest predictive ability. Among datasets, EHIS emerged as the most suitable platform, offering higher indicators' reproducibility and strong validity. Regional analyses revealed a clear North-South gradient, and regression models confirmed that frailty adds explanatory power for health outcomes beyond chronological age and other sociodemographic characteristics. The study demonstrates that bio-psycho-social frailty can be measured using existing national surveys, providing a low-cost and reproducible framework for national monitoring. By highlighting the added value of frailty over age in predicting health needs, it lays the groundwork for integrating frailty assessment into public health planning and supporting more equitable and effective policy responses to population ageing.</p>","PeriodicalId":12059,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Public Health","volume":"36 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13368811/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckag120","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Detecting and measuring frailty is essential to inform health policy. Numerous frailty tools exist, but their application to population data remains limited. This study focuses on Italy and adopts a policymaker's perspective to identify practical, nationally applicable tools for bio-psycho-social frailty assessment using existing survey data. Three validated bio-psycho-social indicators-the Tilburg Frailty Indicator (TFI), the Groningen Frailty Indicator (GFI), and the Edmonton Frail Scale (EFS)-were operationalized across four population surveys (SHARE, EU-SILC, EHIS, and AVQ). The study proceeded in three steps: (i) reconstruction of each indicator within each dataset to assess items' replicability; (ii) validation of reproducible indicators by examining their psychometric properties; (iii) comparison of prevalence and predictive validity across indicators to illustrate their relative strengths and limitations. The GFI was the most replicable across surveys, while the EFS showed the strongest predictive ability. Among datasets, EHIS emerged as the most suitable platform, offering higher indicators' reproducibility and strong validity. Regional analyses revealed a clear North-South gradient, and regression models confirmed that frailty adds explanatory power for health outcomes beyond chronological age and other sociodemographic characteristics. The study demonstrates that bio-psycho-social frailty can be measured using existing national surveys, providing a low-cost and reproducible framework for national monitoring. By highlighting the added value of frailty over age in predicting health needs, it lays the groundwork for integrating frailty assessment into public health planning and supporting more equitable and effective policy responses to population ageing.

通过多种调查和指标测量老年人的生物心理社会脆弱性:来自意大利的公共卫生政策证据。
检测和衡量脆弱性对于为卫生政策提供信息至关重要。存在许多脆弱性工具,但它们在人口数据中的应用仍然有限。本研究以意大利为研究对象,从政策制定者的角度出发,利用现有的调查数据,确定切实可行的、全国适用的生物心理社会脆弱性评估工具。三个经过验证的生物心理社会指标-蒂尔堡虚弱指标(TFI),格罗宁根虚弱指标(GFI)和埃德蒙顿虚弱量表(EFS)-在四个人口调查(SHARE, EU-SILC, EHIS和AVQ)中进行了操作。研究分三个步骤进行:(i)重建每个数据集中的每个指标,以评估项目的可复制性;(ii)通过检查其心理测量特性来验证可重复指标;(iii)比较各指标的流行率和预测效度,以说明其相对优势和局限性。GFI在所有调查中是最可复制的,而EFS显示出最强的预测能力。在数据集中,EHIS是最合适的平台,具有较高的指标再现性和较强的效度。区域分析显示出明显的南北梯度,回归模型证实,身体虚弱增加了对超出实际年龄和其他社会人口特征的健康结果的解释力。该研究表明,生物心理社会脆弱性可以使用现有的国家调查来衡量,为国家监测提供了低成本和可复制的框架。通过突出脆弱程度超过年龄对预测保健需求的附加价值,它为将脆弱程度评估纳入公共卫生规划和支持对人口老龄化采取更公平和有效的政策对策奠定了基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
European Journal of Public Health
European Journal of Public Health 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
2.30%
发文量
2039
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Public Health (EJPH) is a multidisciplinary journal aimed at attracting contributions from epidemiology, health services research, health economics, social sciences, management sciences, ethics and law, environmental health sciences, and other disciplines of relevance to public health. The journal provides a forum for discussion and debate of current international public health issues, with a focus on the European Region. Bi-monthly issues contain peer-reviewed original articles, editorials, commentaries, book reviews, news, letters to the editor, announcements of events, and various other features.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书