Preconception thyroid function optimization and pregnancy outcomes in women with recurrent pregnancy loss: a real-world cohort study.

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q3 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Heze Xu, Zhijiao Wang, Yijia Liu, Shanwei Xing, Hang Zhen, Jiapo Li, Chong Qiao
{"title":"Preconception thyroid function optimization and pregnancy outcomes in women with recurrent pregnancy loss: a real-world cohort study.","authors":"Heze Xu, Zhijiao Wang, Yijia Liu, Shanwei Xing, Hang Zhen, Jiapo Li, Chong Qiao","doi":"10.1530/EC-26-0215","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The management of subclinical hypothyroidism with thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) levels between 2.5 and 4.0 mIU/L in women with recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL) remains controversial, as guidelines derived from general populations conflict. While a recent randomized trial confirmed the benefit of initiating levothyroxine (LT4) during early pregnancy, whether a more proactive strategy of preconception thyroid optimization improves outcomes in this high-risk group remains unknown.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective cohort analysis of 896 women with RPL and elevated TSH (2.5-4.0 mIU/L) during pre-pregnancy, from the Recurrent Pregnancy Loss Cohort Study. Based on clinical records, participants were categorized into two groups: treated group (n = 636) and untreated group (n = 260). The primary outcome was miscarriage. Associations were assessed using Firth's penalized-likelihood regression to address small-sample bias, with propensity score matching as a sensitivity analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After adjustment for antiphospholipid syndrome, degree of education, gravidity, and parity, LT4 treatment was associated with a significantly lower risk of miscarriage (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) = 0.33; 95% CI: 0.20, 0.54; P < 0.001). A reduced risk was also observed for threatened abortion (aOR = 0.49; 95% CI: 0.35, 0.71; P < 0.001). Results were robust in the propensity score-matched analysis.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In women with RPL and elevated TSH (2.5-4.0 mIU/L), a clinical care pathway involving preconception LT4 treatment was significantly associated with a reduced risk of miscarriage. This finding provides real-world evidence supporting the potential value of proactive preconception thyroid optimization in RPL, highlighting it as a priority strategy worthy of prospective investigation versus post-conception treatment initiation.</p>","PeriodicalId":11634,"journal":{"name":"Endocrine Connections","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13393303/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Endocrine Connections","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1530/EC-26-0215","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The management of subclinical hypothyroidism with thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) levels between 2.5 and 4.0 mIU/L in women with recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL) remains controversial, as guidelines derived from general populations conflict. While a recent randomized trial confirmed the benefit of initiating levothyroxine (LT4) during early pregnancy, whether a more proactive strategy of preconception thyroid optimization improves outcomes in this high-risk group remains unknown.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort analysis of 896 women with RPL and elevated TSH (2.5-4.0 mIU/L) during pre-pregnancy, from the Recurrent Pregnancy Loss Cohort Study. Based on clinical records, participants were categorized into two groups: treated group (n = 636) and untreated group (n = 260). The primary outcome was miscarriage. Associations were assessed using Firth's penalized-likelihood regression to address small-sample bias, with propensity score matching as a sensitivity analysis.

Results: After adjustment for antiphospholipid syndrome, degree of education, gravidity, and parity, LT4 treatment was associated with a significantly lower risk of miscarriage (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) = 0.33; 95% CI: 0.20, 0.54; P < 0.001). A reduced risk was also observed for threatened abortion (aOR = 0.49; 95% CI: 0.35, 0.71; P < 0.001). Results were robust in the propensity score-matched analysis.

Conclusion: In women with RPL and elevated TSH (2.5-4.0 mIU/L), a clinical care pathway involving preconception LT4 treatment was significantly associated with a reduced risk of miscarriage. This finding provides real-world evidence supporting the potential value of proactive preconception thyroid optimization in RPL, highlighting it as a priority strategy worthy of prospective investigation versus post-conception treatment initiation.

反复流产妇女的孕前甲状腺功能优化和妊娠结局:一项真实世界队列研究。
背景:在复发性妊娠丢失(RPL)妇女中,促甲状腺激素(TSH)水平在2.5 - 4.0 mIU/L之间的亚临床甲状腺功能减退症的管理仍然存在争议,因为指南来源于一般人群的冲突。虽然最近的一项随机试验证实了在妊娠早期开始使用左旋甲状腺素(LT4)的益处,但更积极的孕前甲状腺优化策略是否能改善这一高危人群的预后仍不得而知。方法:我们对来自复发性妊娠丢失队列研究的896名妊娠前期RPL和TSH升高(2.5-4.0 mIU/L)的女性进行了回顾性队列分析。根据临床记录,参与者被分为治疗组(n=636)和未治疗组(n=260)。主要结果是流产。使用Firth的惩罚似然回归来评估关联,以解决小样本偏差,并使用倾向评分匹配作为敏感性分析。结果:经抗磷脂综合征、受教育程度、胎次、胎次校正后,LT4治疗与流产风险显著降低相关(aOR = 0.33, 95% CI: 0.20, 0.54; P < 0.001)。先兆流产的风险也降低(aOR = 0.49, 95% CI: 0.35, 0.71; P < 0.001)。倾向评分匹配分析的结果是稳健的。结论:在RPL和TSH升高(2.5-4.0 mIU/L)的女性中,包括孕前LT4治疗的临床护理途径与流产风险降低显著相关。这一发现提供了一个现实世界的证据,支持积极的孕前甲状腺优化在RPL中的潜在价值,强调它是值得前瞻性研究的优先策略,而不是孕后治疗开始。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Endocrine Connections
Endocrine Connections Medicine-Internal Medicine
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
3.40%
发文量
361
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊介绍: Endocrine Connections publishes original quality research and reviews in all areas of endocrinology, including papers that deal with non-classical tissues as source or targets of hormones and endocrine papers that have relevance to endocrine-related and intersecting disciplines and the wider biomedical community.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书