Exploring primary care access in Finland: a mixed-methods study in the context of the updated waiting-time guarantee.

IF 5.2 3区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Markku Satokangas, Laura Kihlström, Satu Paatela, Ilmo Keskimäki, Henna Paananen, Liina-Kaisa Tynkkynen
{"title":"Exploring primary care access in Finland: a mixed-methods study in the context of the updated waiting-time guarantee.","authors":"Markku Satokangas, Laura Kihlström, Satu Paatela, Ilmo Keskimäki, Henna Paananen, Liina-Kaisa Tynkkynen","doi":"10.1093/eurpub/ckag121","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Prompt primary care (PC) access is salient for equitable care. Finland has a high level of unmet health needs, characterized by stark socioeconomic disparities and accounted for by long waiting times. In September 2023, Finland updated its legislation regulating waiting times to non-urgent general practitioner (GP) consultations, reducing the maximum waiting time to 14 days. Hereafter, PC access statistics improved. We assessed patients' views towards PC access after the policy update and how they reflect against national statistics. This is an exploratory sequential mixed-methods study in rural North Karelia, Finland. Interviews with patients and staff (n = 40) and observations (150+ hours) were conducted in a public PC centre in January-March 2024. Data on GP consultations including waiting times were obtained annually from individual-level national registers in 2017-24. Older patients with chronic health needs stated increased difficulties in navigating an increasingly digital PC and lack of access to in-person consultations. Staff reported an accelerated need for 'gatekeeping' access to GP consultations due to lack of resources. The number of all GP consultations increased 1.69-fold from 2017 to 2024, but in-person ones reduced 0.60-fold. A change in definition explained the improvement of waiting time statistics. A more robust waiting-time guarantee in Finland took place in tandem with austerity measures and a rapid shift to telemedicine. Improved PC access statistics conflict with local experiences and ignore reduced provision of in-person GP consultations, thus hiding the associated equity impacts. Our results call for investing in more nuanced monitoring of policy changes.</p>","PeriodicalId":12059,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Public Health","volume":"36 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13368859/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckag121","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Prompt primary care (PC) access is salient for equitable care. Finland has a high level of unmet health needs, characterized by stark socioeconomic disparities and accounted for by long waiting times. In September 2023, Finland updated its legislation regulating waiting times to non-urgent general practitioner (GP) consultations, reducing the maximum waiting time to 14 days. Hereafter, PC access statistics improved. We assessed patients' views towards PC access after the policy update and how they reflect against national statistics. This is an exploratory sequential mixed-methods study in rural North Karelia, Finland. Interviews with patients and staff (n = 40) and observations (150+ hours) were conducted in a public PC centre in January-March 2024. Data on GP consultations including waiting times were obtained annually from individual-level national registers in 2017-24. Older patients with chronic health needs stated increased difficulties in navigating an increasingly digital PC and lack of access to in-person consultations. Staff reported an accelerated need for 'gatekeeping' access to GP consultations due to lack of resources. The number of all GP consultations increased 1.69-fold from 2017 to 2024, but in-person ones reduced 0.60-fold. A change in definition explained the improvement of waiting time statistics. A more robust waiting-time guarantee in Finland took place in tandem with austerity measures and a rapid shift to telemedicine. Improved PC access statistics conflict with local experiences and ignore reduced provision of in-person GP consultations, thus hiding the associated equity impacts. Our results call for investing in more nuanced monitoring of policy changes.

探索初级保健可及性在芬兰:在更新的等待时间保证背景下的混合方法研究。
及时获得初级保健(PC)对于公平护理至关重要。芬兰的保健需求未得到满足的程度很高,其特点是社会经济差距很大,等待时间很长。2023年9月,芬兰更新了规定非紧急全科医生(GP)咨询等待时间的立法,将最长等待时间缩短至14天。此后,PC访问统计数据得到改善。我们评估了政策更新后患者对PC访问的看法,以及他们如何反映国家统计数据。这是一项在芬兰北卡累利阿农村进行的探索性顺序混合方法研究。2024年1月至3月,在一家公共PC中心对患者和工作人员进行了访谈(n = 40)和观察(150+小时)。2017-24年,每年从个人层面的国家登记处获得的全科医生咨询数据,包括等待时间。有慢性健康需求的老年患者表示,在日益数字化的个人电脑上导航越来越困难,而且缺乏面对面咨询的机会。工作人员报告说,由于缺乏资源,对全科医生咨询的“把关”需求加快。从2017年到2024年,全科医生的咨询次数增加了1.69倍,但面对面的咨询次数减少了0.60倍。定义的改变解释了等待时间统计数据的改善。在芬兰,更强有力的等待时间保证与紧缩措施和迅速转向远程医疗相结合。改进的PC访问统计数据与当地经验相冲突,忽略了减少的面对面全科医生咨询,从而隐藏了相关的公平影响。我们的研究结果呼吁对政策变化进行更细致入微的监测。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
European Journal of Public Health
European Journal of Public Health 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
2.30%
发文量
2039
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Public Health (EJPH) is a multidisciplinary journal aimed at attracting contributions from epidemiology, health services research, health economics, social sciences, management sciences, ethics and law, environmental health sciences, and other disciplines of relevance to public health. The journal provides a forum for discussion and debate of current international public health issues, with a focus on the European Region. Bi-monthly issues contain peer-reviewed original articles, editorials, commentaries, book reviews, news, letters to the editor, announcements of events, and various other features.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书