Intertransverse process and modified thoracolumbar interfascial plane blocks compared with conventional analgesia in lumbar disc herniation surgery: a randomized controlled trial.

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Dinmuhammed Asker, Çağdaş Baytar, Merve Sena Baytar, Gizem Kurada, Keziban Bollucuoğlu, Rahşan Dilek Okyay, Bengü Gülhan Köksal İncegül, Özcan Pişkin, Hilal Ayoğlu
{"title":"Intertransverse process and modified thoracolumbar interfascial plane blocks compared with conventional analgesia in lumbar disc herniation surgery: a randomized controlled trial.","authors":"Dinmuhammed Asker, Çağdaş Baytar, Merve Sena Baytar, Gizem Kurada, Keziban Bollucuoğlu, Rahşan Dilek Okyay, Bengü Gülhan Köksal İncegül, Özcan Pişkin, Hilal Ayoğlu","doi":"10.1186/s12871-026-04094-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Lumbar disc herniation surgery is associated with considerable postoperative pain despite its minimally invasive nature. Regional fascial plane blocks may reduce opioid consumption and improve recovery as part of multimodal analgesia. This study compared the analgesic efficacy of ultrasound-guided intertransverse process (ITP) and modified thoracolumbar interfascial plane (mTLIP) blocks with conventional analgesia in patients undergoing lumbar disc herniation surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this prospective randomized controlled trial, 84 patients undergoing elective lumbar disc herniation surgery under general anesthesia were allocated to a Control group, an mTLIP group, or an ITP group (n = 28 each). The primary outcome was cumulative morphine consumption during the first 24 postoperative hours. Secondary outcomes included postoperative pain scores, Quality of Recovery-15 (QoR-15) scores, intraoperative remifentanil consumption, and adverse events.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-four-hour morphine consumption was significantly higher in the Control group than in the mTLIP and ITP groups (28.79 ± 10.11 mg vs. 16.93 ± 10.11 mg and 12.86 ± 6.14 mg, respectively; both p < 0.001), with no difference between the block groups. Intraoperative remifentanil consumption was significantly lower in the ITP and mTLIP groups than in the Control group (p < 0.001 and p = 0.001, respectively). Resting pain scores were significantly lower in the ITP group than in the Control group throughout the postoperative period, while dynamic pain scores were lower at the PACU time point and at 6, 12, and 24 h. No significant differences in pain scores were observed between the mTLIP and Control groups or between the two block groups. QoR-15 scores at 24 h were significantly higher in the ITP group than in the Control group (137 [102-150] vs. 130 [60-147]; p = 0.010). No significant differences in postoperative nausea and vomiting were observed, and no block-related complications occurred.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Both ITP and mTLIP blocks reduced perioperative opioid requirements after lumbar disc herniation surgery, with no significant difference between the two blocks. Compared with conventional analgesia, the ITP block was additionally associated with lower postoperative pain scores and improved recovery quality. Both techniques appear to be safe, comparably effective, opioid-sparing components of multimodal analgesia.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov NCT06391541. Prospectively registered on April 26, 2024.</p>","PeriodicalId":9190,"journal":{"name":"BMC Anesthesiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13651157/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Anesthesiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12871-026-04094-2","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Lumbar disc herniation surgery is associated with considerable postoperative pain despite its minimally invasive nature. Regional fascial plane blocks may reduce opioid consumption and improve recovery as part of multimodal analgesia. This study compared the analgesic efficacy of ultrasound-guided intertransverse process (ITP) and modified thoracolumbar interfascial plane (mTLIP) blocks with conventional analgesia in patients undergoing lumbar disc herniation surgery.

Methods: In this prospective randomized controlled trial, 84 patients undergoing elective lumbar disc herniation surgery under general anesthesia were allocated to a Control group, an mTLIP group, or an ITP group (n = 28 each). The primary outcome was cumulative morphine consumption during the first 24 postoperative hours. Secondary outcomes included postoperative pain scores, Quality of Recovery-15 (QoR-15) scores, intraoperative remifentanil consumption, and adverse events.

Results: Twenty-four-hour morphine consumption was significantly higher in the Control group than in the mTLIP and ITP groups (28.79 ± 10.11 mg vs. 16.93 ± 10.11 mg and 12.86 ± 6.14 mg, respectively; both p < 0.001), with no difference between the block groups. Intraoperative remifentanil consumption was significantly lower in the ITP and mTLIP groups than in the Control group (p < 0.001 and p = 0.001, respectively). Resting pain scores were significantly lower in the ITP group than in the Control group throughout the postoperative period, while dynamic pain scores were lower at the PACU time point and at 6, 12, and 24 h. No significant differences in pain scores were observed between the mTLIP and Control groups or between the two block groups. QoR-15 scores at 24 h were significantly higher in the ITP group than in the Control group (137 [102-150] vs. 130 [60-147]; p = 0.010). No significant differences in postoperative nausea and vomiting were observed, and no block-related complications occurred.

Conclusions: Both ITP and mTLIP blocks reduced perioperative opioid requirements after lumbar disc herniation surgery, with no significant difference between the two blocks. Compared with conventional analgesia, the ITP block was additionally associated with lower postoperative pain scores and improved recovery quality. Both techniques appear to be safe, comparably effective, opioid-sparing components of multimodal analgesia.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT06391541. Prospectively registered on April 26, 2024.

腰椎间盘突出症手术中横突间和改良胸腰椎筋膜间平面阻滞与传统镇痛的比较:一项随机对照试验。
背景:腰椎间盘突出症手术尽管具有微创性,但术后仍伴有相当大的疼痛。区域筋膜平面阻滞可减少阿片类药物的消耗,提高多模式镇痛的恢复。本研究比较超声引导下横突间突(ITP)和改良胸腰椎筋膜间平面(mTLIP)阻滞与常规镇痛对腰椎间盘突出症手术患者的镇痛效果。方法:在这项前瞻性随机对照试验中,84例全麻下择期腰椎间盘突出症手术患者被分为对照组、mTLIP组和ITP组(各28例)。主要终点是术后24小时内吗啡的累积用量。次要结局包括术后疼痛评分、恢复质量-15 (QoR-15)评分、术中瑞芬太尼消耗和不良事件。结果:对照组24小时吗啡用量明显高于mTLIP组和ITP组(分别为28.79±10.11 mg和16.93±10.11 mg和12.86±6.14 mg)。结论:ITP和mTLIP阻滞均可减少腰椎间盘突出症术后围手术期阿片类药物需求,两者之间无显著差异。与常规镇痛相比,ITP阻滞还与较低的术后疼痛评分和改善的恢复质量相关。这两种技术似乎都是安全的,相当有效的,多模式镇痛的阿片类成分。试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov NCT06391541。预计于2024年4月26日注册。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Anesthesiology
BMC Anesthesiology ANESTHESIOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
4.50%
发文量
349
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Anesthesiology is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of anesthesiology, critical care, perioperative care and pain management, including clinical and experimental research into anesthetic mechanisms, administration and efficacy, technology and monitoring, and associated economic issues.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书