{"title":"Agitation and delirium in the last days of life: terminology and management-systematic review and narrative synthesis.","authors":"Rebecca A Hatton, Gilli Erez, Miriam J Johnson","doi":"10.1136/spcare-2025-005872","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Delirium and agitation are common and distressing in the last days of life. In specialist palliative care practice, descriptions such as 'terminal agitation' appear to be used more commonly than diagnostic terms. We aimed to explore the discourse surrounding these terms in this setting, their use and impact on management.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this systematic review, we searched electronic databases (Medline, Embase and PsycINFO) for papers focusing on delirium and agitation in the last days of life in palliative care settings. Three reviewers independently selected papers. The frequency of use of terms of interest was noted and surrounding text extracted. Text data were subjected to thematic synthesis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>29 studies were included and three themes identified in the context of the last days of life: (1) definitions and terminology (varied and inconsistent); (2) causes, diagnosis and recognition in the palliative care setting (eg, 'terminal' delirium viewed as irreversible); and (3) management and impact (terminology influences assessment and management, and the clinical and emotional impact on patients, family and staff).Review limitations include the restriction to English language papers and being unable to access some relevant full texts.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We found that inconsistent terminology and ambiguous definitions surrounding agitation and delirium had an impact on care of people with delirium-related and non-delirium-related agitation in the last days of life. The synonymous use of agitation and delirium may compound under-recognition of hypoactive delirium, and the use of the prefix 'terminal' may preclude appropriate assessment of potentially reversible factors despite proximity of death.</p><p><strong>Prospero registration number: </strong>CRD42024582291.</p>","PeriodicalId":9136,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/spcare-2025-005872","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Delirium and agitation are common and distressing in the last days of life. In specialist palliative care practice, descriptions such as 'terminal agitation' appear to be used more commonly than diagnostic terms. We aimed to explore the discourse surrounding these terms in this setting, their use and impact on management.
Methods: In this systematic review, we searched electronic databases (Medline, Embase and PsycINFO) for papers focusing on delirium and agitation in the last days of life in palliative care settings. Three reviewers independently selected papers. The frequency of use of terms of interest was noted and surrounding text extracted. Text data were subjected to thematic synthesis.
Results: 29 studies were included and three themes identified in the context of the last days of life: (1) definitions and terminology (varied and inconsistent); (2) causes, diagnosis and recognition in the palliative care setting (eg, 'terminal' delirium viewed as irreversible); and (3) management and impact (terminology influences assessment and management, and the clinical and emotional impact on patients, family and staff).Review limitations include the restriction to English language papers and being unable to access some relevant full texts.
Conclusion: We found that inconsistent terminology and ambiguous definitions surrounding agitation and delirium had an impact on care of people with delirium-related and non-delirium-related agitation in the last days of life. The synonymous use of agitation and delirium may compound under-recognition of hypoactive delirium, and the use of the prefix 'terminal' may preclude appropriate assessment of potentially reversible factors despite proximity of death.
期刊介绍:
Published quarterly in print and continuously online, BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care aims to connect many disciplines and specialties throughout the world by providing high quality, clinically relevant research, reviews, comment, information and news of international importance.
We hold an inclusive view of supportive and palliative care research and we are able to call on expertise to critique the whole range of methodologies within the subject, including those working in transitional research, clinical trials, epidemiology, behavioural sciences, ethics and health service research. Articles with relevance to clinical practice and clinical service development will be considered for publication.
In an international context, many different categories of clinician and healthcare workers do clinical work associated with palliative medicine, specialist or generalist palliative care, supportive care, psychosocial-oncology and end of life care. We wish to engage many specialties, not only those traditionally associated with supportive and palliative care. We hope to extend the readership to doctors, nurses, other healthcare workers and researchers in medical and surgical specialties, including but not limited to cardiology, gastroenterology, geriatrics, neurology, oncology, paediatrics, primary care, psychiatry, psychology, renal medicine, respiratory medicine.