Association of surgery and economic development in low- and middle-income countries: evidence from a dynamic panel data analysis.

IF 5.8 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Martilord Ifeanyichi, Johnson Ezema Nchege, Ebikabowei Biedomo Aduku, Meskerem Aleka Kebede, Maeve Bognini, Rachel Hargest, Rocco Friebel
{"title":"Association of surgery and economic development in low- and middle-income countries: evidence from a dynamic panel data analysis.","authors":"Martilord Ifeanyichi, Johnson Ezema Nchege, Ebikabowei Biedomo Aduku, Meskerem Aleka Kebede, Maeve Bognini, Rachel Hargest, Rocco Friebel","doi":"10.1136/bmjgh-2025-021115","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>While health improvements drive economic growth, the specific macroeconomic impact of surgery remains unknown. Previous studies have quantified economic losses from unmet need but have not established whether surgery generates economic returns. This study investigates the association between surgical activity and economic growth across low- and middle-income countries (LMICs).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analysed panel data from 95 LMICs (2000-2022) using System Generalised Method of Moments (GMM) estimation. Surgical volume was proxied by per capita suture consumption in kilograms (kg) measured by per capita suture imports (in kg), with gross domestic product (GDP) per capita adjusted for purchasing power parity as the outcome variable. We controlled for education, labour force, infrastructure, quality of governance, health expenditure, and credit availability while addressing endogeneity through internal instrumentation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Each 1% increase in per capita suture consumed corresponded to a 0.0083% increase in per capita GDP (p<0.05). Associations were concentrated and larger in middle-income countries (0.013%; p<0.05) and countries with surgical activity above the 75th percentile in a piecewise spline model (0.016%; p<0.05). No significant associations were found in low-income countries (-0.0039%; p>0.05) or below the 75th percentile surgical activity settings (0.0049%; p>0.05). In a secondary (non-log-transformed) model, a 1-kg increase in per capita sutures consumption corresponded to an increase of 89 international dollars in per capita GDP (p<0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Surgical activity is positively associated with economic growth in LMICs, particularly in higher capacity settings. This provides novel empirical evidence suggesting that surgical investments may yield macroeconomic returns, supporting integration of surgical system strengthening into economic development strategies. Low-income countries may require coordinated investments to build capacity to levels where economic benefits become visible.</p>","PeriodicalId":9137,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Global Health","volume":"11 Suppl 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13374405/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Global Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2025-021115","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: While health improvements drive economic growth, the specific macroeconomic impact of surgery remains unknown. Previous studies have quantified economic losses from unmet need but have not established whether surgery generates economic returns. This study investigates the association between surgical activity and economic growth across low- and middle-income countries (LMICs).

Methods: We analysed panel data from 95 LMICs (2000-2022) using System Generalised Method of Moments (GMM) estimation. Surgical volume was proxied by per capita suture consumption in kilograms (kg) measured by per capita suture imports (in kg), with gross domestic product (GDP) per capita adjusted for purchasing power parity as the outcome variable. We controlled for education, labour force, infrastructure, quality of governance, health expenditure, and credit availability while addressing endogeneity through internal instrumentation.

Results: Each 1% increase in per capita suture consumed corresponded to a 0.0083% increase in per capita GDP (p<0.05). Associations were concentrated and larger in middle-income countries (0.013%; p<0.05) and countries with surgical activity above the 75th percentile in a piecewise spline model (0.016%; p<0.05). No significant associations were found in low-income countries (-0.0039%; p>0.05) or below the 75th percentile surgical activity settings (0.0049%; p>0.05). In a secondary (non-log-transformed) model, a 1-kg increase in per capita sutures consumption corresponded to an increase of 89 international dollars in per capita GDP (p<0.05).

Conclusion: Surgical activity is positively associated with economic growth in LMICs, particularly in higher capacity settings. This provides novel empirical evidence suggesting that surgical investments may yield macroeconomic returns, supporting integration of surgical system strengthening into economic development strategies. Low-income countries may require coordinated investments to build capacity to levels where economic benefits become visible.

低收入和中等收入国家外科手术与经济发展的关系:来自动态面板数据分析的证据。
虽然健康状况的改善推动了经济增长,但手术对宏观经济的具体影响尚不清楚。以前的研究量化了未满足需求造成的经济损失,但没有确定手术是否能产生经济回报。本研究调查了手术活动与中低收入国家(LMICs)经济增长之间的关系。方法:我们使用系统广义矩量法(GMM)估计分析了95个低收入国家(2000-2022)的面板数据。手术量由人均缝线消费量(kg)代表,以人均缝线进口量(kg)衡量,以人均国内生产总值(GDP)为结果变量,根据购买力平价进行调整。我们控制了教育、劳动力、基础设施、治理质量、卫生支出和信贷可用性,同时通过内部工具解决了内质性问题。结果:人均缝线使用量每增加1%对应人均GDP增长0.0083% (p0.05)或低于第75百分位手术活动设置(0.0049%;p>0.05)。在二级(非对数转换)模型中,人均缝合线消费量每增加1公斤,人均GDP就会增加89国际美元。(结论:手术活动与中低收入国家的经济增长呈正相关,特别是在高容量环境中。)这提供了新的经验证据,表明外科投资可能产生宏观经济回报,支持将外科系统加强纳入经济发展战略。低收入国家可能需要协调投资来建设能力,使其达到可以看到经济效益的水平。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMJ Global Health
BMJ Global Health Medicine-Health Policy
CiteScore
11.40
自引率
4.90%
发文量
429
审稿时长
18 weeks
期刊介绍: BMJ Global Health is an online Open Access journal from BMJ that focuses on publishing high-quality peer-reviewed content pertinent to individuals engaged in global health, including policy makers, funders, researchers, clinicians, and frontline healthcare workers. The journal encompasses all facets of global health, with a special emphasis on submissions addressing underfunded areas such as non-communicable diseases (NCDs). It welcomes research across all study phases and designs, from study protocols to phase I trials to meta-analyses, including small or specialized studies. The journal also encourages opinionated discussions on controversial topics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书