Developmental outcomes in 4-year-old children born in the first COVID-19 lockdown in England: preliminary findings from the Born In COVID Year - Core Lockdown Effects (BICYCLE) study.

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q1 PEDIATRICS
Nicola Botting, Chelo Del Rosario, Jane Flynn, Stian Reimers, Catherine Davies, Nayeli Gonzalez-Gomez, Alexandra Hendry, Elisabeth Hill, Michelle McGillion, Becky Moss, Laura Shapiro, Lucy A Henry
{"title":"Developmental outcomes in 4-year-old children born in the first COVID-19 lockdown in England: preliminary findings from the Born In COVID Year - Core Lockdown Effects (BICYCLE) study.","authors":"Nicola Botting, Chelo Del Rosario, Jane Flynn, Stian Reimers, Catherine Davies, Nayeli Gonzalez-Gomez, Alexandra Hendry, Elisabeth Hill, Michelle McGillion, Becky Moss, Laura Shapiro, Lucy A Henry","doi":"10.1136/archdischild-2025-329529","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background/objective: </strong>Children born during England's COVID-19 lockdowns experienced markedly limited social exposure during a crucial developmental window. Given the importance of early interactions in shaping language, executive function and motor skills, this observational cross-sectional study examined developmental outcomes at age 4.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>205 children born in lockdown were assessed using standardised measures with published prepandemic norms: expressive vocabulary, expressive language and receptive language (Expressive Vocabulary, Word Structure and Sentence Structure subtests of the Clinical Evaluation of Language Fundamentals Preschool-second UK edition); receptive vocabulary (British Picture Vocabulary Scale, third edition); executive function (Global Executive Composite (GEC) and Emergent Metacognition Index (EMI) subscales of the Behaviour Rating Inventory of Executive Function-Preschool); motor skills (Motor Skills subscale from the Vineland Adaptive Behaviour Scales) and non-verbal reasoning (Matrices subtest from the British Ability Scales-3). Analyses (n=189-205) compared scores against prepandemic normative expectations and a within-sample benchmark of non-verbal reasoning to assess strengths and weaknesses against general cognitive development.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Compared with normative expectations, Sentence Structure (d=0.59), Expressive Vocabulary (d=0.24), receptive vocabulary (d=0.47) and Matrices (d=0.42) were significantly higher than expected for age. Caregiver-reported executive function was notably lower (GEC, d=-0.46; EMI, d=-0.36), while Word Structure (d=0.01) and Motor Skills (d=0.09) showed no differences. Benchmarked against non-verbal reasoning, Word Structure (d=-0.35), Expressive Vocabulary (d=-0.22), executive function (GEC, d=-0.72; EMI, d=-0.63) and Motor Skills (d=-0.33) were lower than cognitive potential. Sentence Structure (d=0.08) and receptive vocabulary (d=-0.01) were consistent with non-verbal reasoning.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Caregiver-reported executive function was the most noteworthy area of concern for children born in lockdown. Expressive language and motor skills were lower than a benchmark of non-verbal reasoning, suggesting some impacts in relation to cognitive potential. This may lead to educational vulnerabilities and additional support needs in classrooms. Overall, these findings offer valuable early insight into postpandemic developmental impacts and underscore the urgent need for responsive educational policy and targeted support for those now in schooling.</p>","PeriodicalId":8150,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Disease in Childhood","volume":" ","pages":"910-918"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13638306/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Disease in Childhood","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/archdischild-2025-329529","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background/objective: Children born during England's COVID-19 lockdowns experienced markedly limited social exposure during a crucial developmental window. Given the importance of early interactions in shaping language, executive function and motor skills, this observational cross-sectional study examined developmental outcomes at age 4.

Methods: 205 children born in lockdown were assessed using standardised measures with published prepandemic norms: expressive vocabulary, expressive language and receptive language (Expressive Vocabulary, Word Structure and Sentence Structure subtests of the Clinical Evaluation of Language Fundamentals Preschool-second UK edition); receptive vocabulary (British Picture Vocabulary Scale, third edition); executive function (Global Executive Composite (GEC) and Emergent Metacognition Index (EMI) subscales of the Behaviour Rating Inventory of Executive Function-Preschool); motor skills (Motor Skills subscale from the Vineland Adaptive Behaviour Scales) and non-verbal reasoning (Matrices subtest from the British Ability Scales-3). Analyses (n=189-205) compared scores against prepandemic normative expectations and a within-sample benchmark of non-verbal reasoning to assess strengths and weaknesses against general cognitive development.

Results: Compared with normative expectations, Sentence Structure (d=0.59), Expressive Vocabulary (d=0.24), receptive vocabulary (d=0.47) and Matrices (d=0.42) were significantly higher than expected for age. Caregiver-reported executive function was notably lower (GEC, d=-0.46; EMI, d=-0.36), while Word Structure (d=0.01) and Motor Skills (d=0.09) showed no differences. Benchmarked against non-verbal reasoning, Word Structure (d=-0.35), Expressive Vocabulary (d=-0.22), executive function (GEC, d=-0.72; EMI, d=-0.63) and Motor Skills (d=-0.33) were lower than cognitive potential. Sentence Structure (d=0.08) and receptive vocabulary (d=-0.01) were consistent with non-verbal reasoning.

Conclusions: Caregiver-reported executive function was the most noteworthy area of concern for children born in lockdown. Expressive language and motor skills were lower than a benchmark of non-verbal reasoning, suggesting some impacts in relation to cognitive potential. This may lead to educational vulnerabilities and additional support needs in classrooms. Overall, these findings offer valuable early insight into postpandemic developmental impacts and underscore the urgent need for responsive educational policy and targeted support for those now in schooling.

英格兰首次COVID-19封锁期间出生的4岁儿童的发育结果:出生在COVID年-核心封锁效应(BICYCLE)研究的初步结果。
背景/目的:在英格兰COVID-19封锁期间出生的儿童在一个关键的发育窗口期的社会接触明显有限。鉴于早期互动在塑造语言、执行功能和运动技能方面的重要性,这项观察性横断面研究考察了4岁时的发展结果。方法:采用标准化措施评估205名在封锁期间出生的儿童,采用公布的大流行前规范:表达性词汇、表达性语言和接受性语言(表达性词汇、单词结构和句子结构子测试学龄前语言基础临床评估-第二版英国版);接受性词汇(英国图片词汇量表,第三版);执行功能(执行功能行为评定量表的全球执行综合量表(GEC)和突发元认知指数(EMI)子量表);运动技能(来自Vineland适应行为量表的运动技能子量表)和非语言推理(来自英国能力量表-3的矩阵子测试)。分析(n=189-205)将得分与大流行前的规范预期和非语言推理的样本内基准进行比较,以评估与一般认知发展相比的优势和劣势。结果:与规范期望相比,句子结构(d=0.59)、表达词汇(d=0.24)、接受词汇(d=0.47)和矩阵(d=0.42)在年龄上显著高于预期。照顾者报告的执行功能明显较低(GEC, d=-0.46; EMI, d=-0.36),而文字结构(d=0.01)和运动技能(d=0.09)没有差异。以非言语推理为基准,单词结构(d=-0.35)、表达词汇(d=-0.22)、执行功能(GEC, d=-0.72; EMI, d=-0.63)和运动技能(d=-0.33)低于认知潜能。句子结构(d=0.08)和接受性词汇(d=-0.01)与非言语推理一致。结论:护理人员报告的执行功能是在封锁中出生的儿童最值得关注的领域。表达语言和运动技能低于非语言推理的基准,这表明与认知潜力有关的一些影响。这可能导致教育上的脆弱性和课堂上额外的支持需求。总的来说,这些发现为大流行后的发展影响提供了有价值的早期见解,并强调迫切需要制定有针对性的教育政策,并为在校学生提供有针对性的支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
3.80%
发文量
291
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Archives of Disease in Childhood is an international peer review journal that aims to keep paediatricians and others up to date with advances in the diagnosis and treatment of childhood diseases as well as advocacy issues such as child protection. It focuses on all aspects of child health and disease from the perinatal period (in the Fetal and Neonatal edition) through to adolescence. ADC includes original research reports, commentaries, reviews of clinical and policy issues, and evidence reports. Areas covered include: community child health, public health, epidemiology, acute paediatrics, advocacy, and ethics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书