Operating Room Professionals' Awareness of Possible Unconscious Auditory Perception During General Anesthesia: A Cross-Sectional Survey Study.

IF 1.5 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Anesthesiology Research and Practice Pub Date : 2026-07-14 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.1155/anrp/9936739
Emine Özcan
{"title":"Operating Room Professionals' Awareness of Possible Unconscious Auditory Perception During General Anesthesia: A Cross-Sectional Survey Study.","authors":"Emine Özcan","doi":"10.1155/anrp/9936739","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Explicit recall during general anesthesia is rare; however, experimental and clinical evidence suggests that auditory stimuli may sometimes be processed at an implicit or unconscious level. Routine intraoperative conversations differ from structured therapeutic suggestions; nevertheless, they form part of the auditory environment surrounding anesthetized patients. This study aimed to assess operating room professionals' awareness of possible unconscious auditory perception related to intraoperative conversations during general anesthesia, their previous educational exposure, and their professional attitudes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this cross-sectional survey, an anonymous 19-item online questionnaire was distributed to operating room health professionals in Türkiye through professional communication networks. Descriptive statistics were reported as <i>n</i> (%). A study-specific 9-item exploratory Awareness/Professional Attitude Index was calculated with two items reverse-coded, and internal consistency was assessed using Cronbach's alpha. Between-group comparisons were performed using the Mann-Whitney <i>U</i> test and the Kruskal-Wallis test. A <i>p</i> value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 251 responses were analyzed, and 96.4% of participants reported that they were actively working in the operating room. Most participants agreed that intraoperative communication should remain within appropriate professional boundaries (97.2%) and that awareness-oriented education on this topic is needed (88.0%). However, 74.5% reported that they had not received formal education on this topic, and only 19.5% reported exposure to related scientific education or activities. The study-specific exploratory Awareness/Professional Attitude Index was 3.61 ± 0.67 and showed high internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = 0.83). Index scores were higher in women than in men (3.76 vs 3.43; <i>p</i> < 0.001) and differed across professional groups (<i>p</i> = 0.001) and experience groups (<i>p</i> = 0.023). These findings indicate a gap between the perceived importance of communication around anesthetized patients and formal educational exposure.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Operating room professionals reported substantial awareness of the importance of intraoperative conversations in the context of possible unconscious auditory perception during general anesthesia. However, formal educational exposure to this topic was limited. These descriptive findings do not demonstrate effects on patient outcomes; however, they identify an awareness-education gap and support awareness-oriented education, clearer communication norms around anesthetized patients, and further research using standardized measurement approaches, as well as observational or interventional designs. <b>Trial registration:</b> ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT07396727. Registration date: September 26, 2025.</p>","PeriodicalId":7834,"journal":{"name":"Anesthesiology Research and Practice","volume":"2026 ","pages":"9936739"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13366206/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anesthesiology Research and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/anrp/9936739","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Explicit recall during general anesthesia is rare; however, experimental and clinical evidence suggests that auditory stimuli may sometimes be processed at an implicit or unconscious level. Routine intraoperative conversations differ from structured therapeutic suggestions; nevertheless, they form part of the auditory environment surrounding anesthetized patients. This study aimed to assess operating room professionals' awareness of possible unconscious auditory perception related to intraoperative conversations during general anesthesia, their previous educational exposure, and their professional attitudes.

Methods: In this cross-sectional survey, an anonymous 19-item online questionnaire was distributed to operating room health professionals in Türkiye through professional communication networks. Descriptive statistics were reported as n (%). A study-specific 9-item exploratory Awareness/Professional Attitude Index was calculated with two items reverse-coded, and internal consistency was assessed using Cronbach's alpha. Between-group comparisons were performed using the Mann-Whitney U test and the Kruskal-Wallis test. A p value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results: A total of 251 responses were analyzed, and 96.4% of participants reported that they were actively working in the operating room. Most participants agreed that intraoperative communication should remain within appropriate professional boundaries (97.2%) and that awareness-oriented education on this topic is needed (88.0%). However, 74.5% reported that they had not received formal education on this topic, and only 19.5% reported exposure to related scientific education or activities. The study-specific exploratory Awareness/Professional Attitude Index was 3.61 ± 0.67 and showed high internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = 0.83). Index scores were higher in women than in men (3.76 vs 3.43; p < 0.001) and differed across professional groups (p = 0.001) and experience groups (p = 0.023). These findings indicate a gap between the perceived importance of communication around anesthetized patients and formal educational exposure.

Conclusions: Operating room professionals reported substantial awareness of the importance of intraoperative conversations in the context of possible unconscious auditory perception during general anesthesia. However, formal educational exposure to this topic was limited. These descriptive findings do not demonstrate effects on patient outcomes; however, they identify an awareness-education gap and support awareness-oriented education, clearer communication norms around anesthetized patients, and further research using standardized measurement approaches, as well as observational or interventional designs. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT07396727. Registration date: September 26, 2025.

手术室专业人员对全麻过程中可能无意识听觉感知的意识:一项横断面调查研究。
背景:全麻期间外显回忆是罕见的;然而,实验和临床证据表明,听觉刺激有时可能在内隐或无意识的水平上被加工。常规术中对话不同于结构化的治疗建议;然而,它们构成了麻醉患者周围听觉环境的一部分。本研究旨在评估手术室专业人员对全麻术中对话中可能存在的无意识听觉感知的认知、他们以往的教育程度以及他们的专业态度。方法:采用横断面调查法,通过专业交流网络向基伊省手术室卫生专业人员发放一份19项匿名在线问卷。描述性统计以n(%)报告。以9项探索性意识/职业态度指数计算,其中2项反向编码,并使用Cronbach's alpha评估内部一致性。采用Mann-Whitney U检验和Kruskal-Wallis检验进行组间比较。结果:共分析251份反馈,96.4%的参与者报告他们在手术室积极工作。大多数参与者认为术中沟通应保持在适当的专业范围内(97.2%),需要对这一主题进行意识教育(88.0%)。然而,74.5%的人报告说他们没有接受过这方面的正规教育,只有19.5%的人报告说他们接受过相关的科学教育或活动。研究特异性探索性意识/职业态度指数为3.61±0.67,具有较高的内部一致性(Cronbach’s alpha = 0.83)。女性的指数得分高于男性(3.76比3.43;p < 0.001),在专业组(p = 0.001)和经验组(p = 0.023)之间存在差异。这些发现表明,在麻醉患者周围沟通的重要性与正规教育接触之间存在差距。结论:手术室专业人员报告了在全麻过程中可能无意识听觉感知的背景下,术中对话的重要性。然而,正式的教育接触这一主题是有限的。这些描述性发现并未证明对患者预后有影响;然而,他们发现了意识教育的差距,并支持以意识为导向的教育,麻醉患者周围更清晰的沟通规范,以及使用标准化测量方法以及观察或介入设计的进一步研究。试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT07396727。报名日期:2025年9月26日。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
29
审稿时长
18 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书