Calibration bias evaluation and correction of S-band ground-based radar reflectivity using Ku-band space borne radar observations along the east coast of India

IF 1.6 4区 地球科学 Q3 ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS
Radio Science Pub Date : 2026-06-01 Epub Date: 2026-07-03 DOI:10.1029/2025RS008484
Shruti Saini;Subrata Kumar Das;Abhishek Kumar Jha;Yogesh K. Kolte;U. V. Murali Krishna;Sachin M. Deshpande
{"title":"Calibration bias evaluation and correction of S-band ground-based radar reflectivity using Ku-band space borne radar observations along the east coast of India","authors":"Shruti Saini;Subrata Kumar Das;Abhishek Kumar Jha;Yogesh K. Kolte;U. V. Murali Krishna;Sachin M. Deshpande","doi":"10.1029/2025RS008484","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The India Meteorological Department (IMD) has strategically deployed several S-band weather radars along India's coastal vicinity for weather monitoring. As radar reflectivity is critical for rainfall estimation, nowcasting, and numerical model assimilation, ensuring data quality is essential before use. The preferred approach is to minimize errors or compensate using offsets through relative (engineering) or absolute (reference-based) calibration. This study compares reflectivity measurements from four operational IMD S-band ground radars (GR) along India's east coast with Ku-band observations from the Global Precipitation Measurement (GPM) satellite's spaceborne radar (SR). The common volume sampled by the SR and GR is identified using the volume matching method, accounting for resolution, geometry, frequency scaling, and timing. The assessment is conducted to quantify the absolute calibration bias in GRs. Comparison with SR measurements reveals systematic mean differences in GR reflectivity ranging from − 9.4 to 0.3 dB across sites. The reflectivity bias varies by up to ±20 dB, driven by spatial and temporal variability, precipitation type, bright-band presence, and other meteorological factors affecting GR. Linear transformations and iterative methods account for calibration bias at each site, thereby improving results. The mean bias at each site is reduced to < |1| dB. Further, corrections are applied to compensate for the bias variability introduced by spatial-temporal averaging and by process-based diagnostic approaches, such as distinct corrections for convective, stratiform, and bright-band effects.","PeriodicalId":49638,"journal":{"name":"Radio Science","volume":"61 6","pages":"1-22"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radio Science","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/11595062/","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/7/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The India Meteorological Department (IMD) has strategically deployed several S-band weather radars along India's coastal vicinity for weather monitoring. As radar reflectivity is critical for rainfall estimation, nowcasting, and numerical model assimilation, ensuring data quality is essential before use. The preferred approach is to minimize errors or compensate using offsets through relative (engineering) or absolute (reference-based) calibration. This study compares reflectivity measurements from four operational IMD S-band ground radars (GR) along India's east coast with Ku-band observations from the Global Precipitation Measurement (GPM) satellite's spaceborne radar (SR). The common volume sampled by the SR and GR is identified using the volume matching method, accounting for resolution, geometry, frequency scaling, and timing. The assessment is conducted to quantify the absolute calibration bias in GRs. Comparison with SR measurements reveals systematic mean differences in GR reflectivity ranging from − 9.4 to 0.3 dB across sites. The reflectivity bias varies by up to ±20 dB, driven by spatial and temporal variability, precipitation type, bright-band presence, and other meteorological factors affecting GR. Linear transformations and iterative methods account for calibration bias at each site, thereby improving results. The mean bias at each site is reduced to < |1| dB. Further, corrections are applied to compensate for the bias variability introduced by spatial-temporal averaging and by process-based diagnostic approaches, such as distinct corrections for convective, stratiform, and bright-band effects.
基于印度东海岸ku波段星载雷达观测的s波段地面雷达反射率定标偏差评估与校正
印度气象部门(IMD)在印度沿海地区战略性地部署了几台s波段气象雷达,用于天气监测。由于雷达反射率对降雨估计、临近预报和数值模式同化至关重要,因此在使用前确保数据质量至关重要。首选的方法是通过相对(工程)或绝对(基于参考)校准来最小化误差或使用偏移进行补偿。这项研究比较了印度东海岸四个运行的IMD s波段地面雷达(GR)的反射率测量结果与全球降水测量(GPM)卫星的星载雷达(SR)的ku波段观测结果。使用体积匹配方法,考虑分辨率、几何形状、频率缩放和时序,识别SR和GR采样的公共体积。进行评估是为了量化GRs的绝对校准偏差。与SR测量值的比较显示,不同站点间GR反射率的系统平均差异在−9.4 ~ 0.3 dB之间。受时空变异性、降水类型、亮带存在以及其他影响GR的气象因素的影响,反射率偏差最大可达±20 dB。线性变换和迭代方法考虑了每个站点的校准偏差,从而改善了结果。每个站点的平均偏置降低到< || dB。此外,校正应用于补偿由时空平均和基于过程的诊断方法引入的偏差变异性,例如对流、层状和亮带效应的不同校正。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Radio Science
Radio Science 工程技术-地球化学与地球物理
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
12.50%
发文量
112
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Radio Science (RDS) publishes original scientific contributions on radio-frequency electromagnetic-propagation and its applications. Contributions covering measurement, modelling, prediction and forecasting techniques pertinent to fields and waves - including antennas, signals and systems, the terrestrial and space environment and radio propagation problems in radio astronomy - are welcome. Contributions may address propagation through, interaction with, and remote sensing of structures, geophysical media, plasmas, and materials, as well as the application of radio frequency electromagnetic techniques to remote sensing of the Earth and other bodies in the solar system.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书