Religiosity and sexuality: A person- and couple-based approach.

IF 2.4 2区 心理学 Q2 FAMILY STUDIES
Journal of Family Psychology Pub Date : 2026-09-01 Epub Date: 2026-07-13 DOI:10.1037/fam0001504
Nathan D Leonhardt, Eliza Dunn, Dean M Busby, Chelom E Leavitt, Robert M Betten, Rebecca Clarke, Hannah Hatch
{"title":"Religiosity and sexuality: A person- and couple-based approach.","authors":"Nathan D Leonhardt, Eliza Dunn, Dean M Busby, Chelom E Leavitt, Robert M Betten, Rebecca Clarke, Hannah Hatch","doi":"10.1037/fam0001504","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Research suggests that viewing sex as being imbued with sacred qualities (nontheistic sexual sanctification) often links religiosity to higher sexual satisfaction. However, some have suggested that religiosity can also lead to less sexual satisfaction through negative sexual attitudes, such as guilt or inhibited passion. To understand how religiosity differs based on combinations of nontheistic sexual sanctification and negative sexual attitudes, data from three exploratory studies (Study 1: 1,615 individuals; Study 2: 1,695 individuals; Study 3: 481 mixed-gender couples) were analyzed using latent profile analysis. This approach identified groups based on levels of nontheistic sexual sanctification and negative sexual attitudes (i.e., guilt, inhibited passion). Group differences in these profiles were tested in relation to religiosity and sexual quality indicators, including satisfaction, desire, frequency, and orgasm consistency. Across all three samples, we found profiles of <i>no guilt/yes sanctification</i> or <i>no inhibition/yes sanctification</i> who tended to be high in religiosity and report positive sexual experiences. There were also several <i>yes guilt/yes sanctification</i> or <i>yes inhibition/yes sanctification</i> profiles, who also tended to be high in religiosity and have more mixed outcomes in their sexual relationships. Finally, although less prevalent, some profiles, such as <i>yes guilt/no sanctification</i> or <i>yes inhibition/no</i> <i>sanctification</i> emerged particularly for women, who tended to be lower in religiosity and have worse sexual outcomes overall. These results highlight the complexity of mixed positive and negative attitudes toward sexuality and how they connect to religiosity and sexual outcomes. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":48381,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Family Psychology","volume":" ","pages":"957-970"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Family Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/fam0001504","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/7/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"FAMILY STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Research suggests that viewing sex as being imbued with sacred qualities (nontheistic sexual sanctification) often links religiosity to higher sexual satisfaction. However, some have suggested that religiosity can also lead to less sexual satisfaction through negative sexual attitudes, such as guilt or inhibited passion. To understand how religiosity differs based on combinations of nontheistic sexual sanctification and negative sexual attitudes, data from three exploratory studies (Study 1: 1,615 individuals; Study 2: 1,695 individuals; Study 3: 481 mixed-gender couples) were analyzed using latent profile analysis. This approach identified groups based on levels of nontheistic sexual sanctification and negative sexual attitudes (i.e., guilt, inhibited passion). Group differences in these profiles were tested in relation to religiosity and sexual quality indicators, including satisfaction, desire, frequency, and orgasm consistency. Across all three samples, we found profiles of no guilt/yes sanctification or no inhibition/yes sanctification who tended to be high in religiosity and report positive sexual experiences. There were also several yes guilt/yes sanctification or yes inhibition/yes sanctification profiles, who also tended to be high in religiosity and have more mixed outcomes in their sexual relationships. Finally, although less prevalent, some profiles, such as yes guilt/no sanctification or yes inhibition/no sanctification emerged particularly for women, who tended to be lower in religiosity and have worse sexual outcomes overall. These results highlight the complexity of mixed positive and negative attitudes toward sexuality and how they connect to religiosity and sexual outcomes. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).

宗教信仰与性:以个人和夫妻为基础的方法。
研究表明,将性视为充满了神圣的品质(无神论的性圣化),往往将宗教虔诚与更高的性满意度联系起来。然而,一些人认为,宗教虔诚也会通过消极的性态度(如内疚或抑制激情)导致性满意度降低。为了了解宗教信仰在无神性圣化和消极性态度的基础上是如何不同的,我们使用潜在特征分析分析了来自三个探索性研究的数据(研究1:1,615个人;研究2:1,695个人;研究3:481对混合性别夫妇)。这种方法根据非有神论的性圣化和消极的性态度(即内疚、压抑的激情)的水平来确定群体。这些概况的组间差异被测试与宗教信仰和性质量指标有关,包括满意度、欲望、频率和性高潮一致性。在所有三个样本中,我们发现没有内疚/是圣化或没有抑制/是圣化的人往往具有高度的宗教虔诚度,并报告积极的性经历。也有一些是内疚/成圣或者是抑制/成圣的人,他们的宗教虔诚度也往往很高,在性关系中结果也更复杂。最后,尽管不那么普遍,但有些情况,如内疚/不圣洁或抑制/不圣洁,尤其出现在女性身上,她们的宗教虔诚程度往往较低,总体上的性结果也较差。这些结果突出了对性的积极和消极态度的复杂性,以及它们如何与宗教信仰和性结果联系在一起。(PsycInfo数据库记录(c) 2026 APA,版权所有)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
3.70%
发文量
200
期刊介绍: Journal of Family Psychology offers cutting-edge, groundbreaking, state-of-the-art, and innovative empirical research with real-world applicability in the field of family psychology. This premiere family research journal is devoted to the study of the family system, broadly defined, from multiple perspectives and to the application of psychological methods to advance knowledge related to family research, patterns and processes, and assessment and intervention, as well as to policies relevant to advancing the quality of life for families.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书