Goal-concordant care for older adults with advanced heart failure: A retrospective cohort study.

IF 6.4 2区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Palliative Medicine Pub Date : 2026-10-01 Epub Date: 2026-07-14 DOI:10.1177/02692163261464366
Sarah Godfrey, Maryjane Farr
{"title":"Goal-concordant care for older adults with advanced heart failure: A retrospective cohort study.","authors":"Sarah Godfrey, Maryjane Farr","doi":"10.1177/02692163261464366","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Older adults with advanced heart failure experience significant morbidity and mortality and face higher complication rates from advanced therapies. Ensuring these therapies match patients' values is essential for patient-centered care, and palliative care can be instrumental in clarifying patients' goals.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To examine the relationship between advanced heart failure patients' expressed goals of care and their subsequent clinical outcomes and circumstances of death.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>In this retrospective cohort study, electronic medical records were reviewed for demographic information, advanced therapy evaluation outcomes, and quality-of-death metrics. Goals of care were identified from palliative consult notes and compared with outcomes to assess goal-concordance.</p><p><strong>Setting/participants: </strong>This single-center study included adults who were referred to both advanced heart failure and palliative care specialists from 2012 to 2022.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 212 patients, 91 (42.9%) underwent evaluation for advanced therapies, though few received a heart transplant (16, 7.5%) or left ventricular assist device (32, 15.1%). Most (148, 69.8%) had only one palliative physician visit. One hundred thirty-nine (65.6%) died, often in the hospital (55, 40%) and with life-sustaining therapy in the last 24 h (73, 52.5%). Most (167, 78.8%) received goal-concordant care, with the main reasons for discordance being the desire for advanced therapy (33, 15.6%) and complications post-implantation affecting quality of life (9, 4.2%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Few older adults received advanced therapies, and palliative care was underutilized, with many patients seeing palliative care only once. Most received goal-concordant care, but decisions were often made late, highlighting the need for earlier, longitudinal palliative care for these vulnerable patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":19849,"journal":{"name":"Palliative Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"1388-1393"},"PeriodicalIF":6.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Palliative Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/02692163261464366","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/7/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Older adults with advanced heart failure experience significant morbidity and mortality and face higher complication rates from advanced therapies. Ensuring these therapies match patients' values is essential for patient-centered care, and palliative care can be instrumental in clarifying patients' goals.

Aim: To examine the relationship between advanced heart failure patients' expressed goals of care and their subsequent clinical outcomes and circumstances of death.

Design: In this retrospective cohort study, electronic medical records were reviewed for demographic information, advanced therapy evaluation outcomes, and quality-of-death metrics. Goals of care were identified from palliative consult notes and compared with outcomes to assess goal-concordance.

Setting/participants: This single-center study included adults who were referred to both advanced heart failure and palliative care specialists from 2012 to 2022.

Results: Of 212 patients, 91 (42.9%) underwent evaluation for advanced therapies, though few received a heart transplant (16, 7.5%) or left ventricular assist device (32, 15.1%). Most (148, 69.8%) had only one palliative physician visit. One hundred thirty-nine (65.6%) died, often in the hospital (55, 40%) and with life-sustaining therapy in the last 24 h (73, 52.5%). Most (167, 78.8%) received goal-concordant care, with the main reasons for discordance being the desire for advanced therapy (33, 15.6%) and complications post-implantation affecting quality of life (9, 4.2%).

Conclusions: Few older adults received advanced therapies, and palliative care was underutilized, with many patients seeing palliative care only once. Most received goal-concordant care, but decisions were often made late, highlighting the need for earlier, longitudinal palliative care for these vulnerable patients.

高龄心力衰竭患者目标一致护理:一项回顾性队列研究。
背景:老年晚期心力衰竭患者有显著的发病率和死亡率,并且在先进的治疗中面临更高的并发症发生率。确保这些疗法符合患者的价值观对于以患者为中心的护理至关重要,姑息治疗可以帮助明确患者的目标。目的:探讨晚期心力衰竭患者表达的护理目标与其随后的临床结局和死亡情况之间的关系。设计:在这项回顾性队列研究中,对电子病历进行了人口统计信息、高级治疗评估结果和死亡质量指标的审查。从姑息治疗咨询记录中确定护理目标,并与结果进行比较,以评估目标的一致性。环境/参与者:这项单中心研究包括2012年至2022年期间转介给晚期心力衰竭和姑息治疗专家的成年人。结果:212例患者中,91例(42.9%)接受了高级治疗评估,但很少接受心脏移植(16.7.5%)或左心室辅助装置(32.15.1%)。大多数患者(148人,69.8%)只接受过一次姑息治疗医生的就诊。139例(65.6%)死亡,通常是在医院(55,40%)和最后24小时内接受维持生命治疗(73,52.5%)。大多数患者(167例,78.8%)接受了目标一致的护理,不一致的主要原因是对高级治疗的渴望(33例,15.6%)和植入后影响生活质量的并发症(9例,4.2%)。结论:很少有老年人接受了先进的治疗,姑息治疗没有得到充分利用,许多患者只接受了一次姑息治疗。大多数患者都接受了目标一致的护理,但决策往往很晚,这突出了对这些弱势患者进行早期、纵向姑息治疗的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Palliative Medicine
Palliative Medicine 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
9.10%
发文量
125
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Palliative Medicine is a highly ranked, peer reviewed scholarly journal dedicated to improving knowledge and clinical practice in the palliative care of patients with far advanced disease. This outstanding journal features editorials, original papers, review articles, case reports, correspondence and book reviews. Essential reading for all members of the palliative care team. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书