Caregiver and Care Recipient Perspectives on Paediatric ED Mental Health Presentations: A Qualitative Study

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q2 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Manissa Sufian, Yao Xu, Marietta John-White, Frank Muscara, Franz E. Babl, Vicki Anderson, Catherine L. Wilson, Meredith L. Borland, Bruce J. Tonge, Kylie M. Gray, Glenn A. Melvin, Amit Kochar, Rohan Borschmann, Richard Haslam, Emma Tavender, Michael S. Gordon, Stuart Dalziel, Karen Smith, Simon Craig
{"title":"Caregiver and Care Recipient Perspectives on Paediatric ED Mental Health Presentations: A Qualitative Study","authors":"Manissa Sufian,&nbsp;Yao Xu,&nbsp;Marietta John-White,&nbsp;Frank Muscara,&nbsp;Franz E. Babl,&nbsp;Vicki Anderson,&nbsp;Catherine L. Wilson,&nbsp;Meredith L. Borland,&nbsp;Bruce J. Tonge,&nbsp;Kylie M. Gray,&nbsp;Glenn A. Melvin,&nbsp;Amit Kochar,&nbsp;Rohan Borschmann,&nbsp;Richard Haslam,&nbsp;Emma Tavender,&nbsp;Michael S. Gordon,&nbsp;Stuart Dalziel,&nbsp;Karen Smith,&nbsp;Simon Craig","doi":"10.1111/1742-6723.70309","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>To explore <i>care recipients</i> (patients' and their caregivers) and <i>care providers</i> (healthcare providers' and law enforcement officers') perspectives on paediatric mental health presentations to emergency departments, to identify challenges to care.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Secondary qualitative analysis of free-text responses from a Delphi study conducted within the Paediatric Research in Emergency Departments International Collaborative (PREDICT) network in 2022. The original Delphi process aimed to identify research themes and key data points for child and adolescent mental health ED presentations; however, a large number of additional free-text responses were received. The primary aim of this specific study was to identify major categories using the General Inductive Approach (GIA) of these free-text responses to explore the experiences, service delivery and perceived challenges of care recipients and care providers. Patients were recruited from 12 EDs across three Australian states, and pre-hospital services (two police and three ambulance departments) across four Australian states.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>A total of 184 participants provided responses (36 care recipients and 148 care providers). Three main categories are described: (1) care continuity and communication gaps, (2) challenges in the ED environment and (3) need for improved training and education and behavioural support.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Care recipients and care providers identified challenges in service coordination, clinician readiness and the ED environment. Strengthening communication, expanding training, reducing sensory overload and improving privacy in physical EDs and improving links to community care could enhance patient experiences and outcomes.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":11604,"journal":{"name":"Emergency Medicine Australasia","volume":"38 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1742-6723.70309","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Emergency Medicine Australasia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1742-6723.70309","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

To explore care recipients (patients' and their caregivers) and care providers (healthcare providers' and law enforcement officers') perspectives on paediatric mental health presentations to emergency departments, to identify challenges to care.

Methods

Secondary qualitative analysis of free-text responses from a Delphi study conducted within the Paediatric Research in Emergency Departments International Collaborative (PREDICT) network in 2022. The original Delphi process aimed to identify research themes and key data points for child and adolescent mental health ED presentations; however, a large number of additional free-text responses were received. The primary aim of this specific study was to identify major categories using the General Inductive Approach (GIA) of these free-text responses to explore the experiences, service delivery and perceived challenges of care recipients and care providers. Patients were recruited from 12 EDs across three Australian states, and pre-hospital services (two police and three ambulance departments) across four Australian states.

Results

A total of 184 participants provided responses (36 care recipients and 148 care providers). Three main categories are described: (1) care continuity and communication gaps, (2) challenges in the ED environment and (3) need for improved training and education and behavioural support.

Conclusions

Care recipients and care providers identified challenges in service coordination, clinician readiness and the ED environment. Strengthening communication, expanding training, reducing sensory overload and improving privacy in physical EDs and improving links to community care could enhance patient experiences and outcomes.

照顾者和受照顾者对儿科急诊科心理健康表现的看法:一项定性研究。
目的:探讨护理接受者(患者及其护理人员)和护理提供者(医疗保健提供者和执法人员)对急诊科儿科心理健康报告的看法,以确定护理面临的挑战。方法:对2022年在急诊科儿科研究国际合作(PREDICT)网络中进行的德尔菲研究的自由文本回复进行二次定性分析。最初的德尔菲过程旨在确定儿童和青少年心理健康ED报告的研究主题和关键数据点;但是,又收到了大量额外的自由文本答复。这项具体研究的主要目的是使用一般归纳方法(GIA)来确定这些自由文本回复的主要类别,以探索护理接受者和护理提供者的经验、服务提供和感知挑战。患者来自澳大利亚三个州的12个急诊科,以及澳大利亚四个州的院前服务(两个警察局和三个救护车部门)。结果:共有184名参与者提供了回应(36名护理接受者和148名护理提供者)。本文描述了三个主要类别:(1)护理连续性和沟通差距;(2)急诊科环境中的挑战;(3)需要改进培训、教育和行为支持。结论:护理接受者和护理提供者确定了服务协调、临床医生准备和急诊科环境方面的挑战。加强沟通、扩大培训、减少感官超载、改善实体急诊科的隐私以及改善与社区护理的联系,可以改善患者的体验和结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Emergency Medicine Australasia
Emergency Medicine Australasia 医学-急救医学
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
13.00%
发文量
217
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Emergency Medicine Australasia is the official journal of the Australasian College for Emergency Medicine (ACEM) and the Australasian Society for Emergency Medicine (ASEM), and publishes original articles dealing with all aspects of clinical practice, research, education and experiences in emergency medicine. Original articles are published under the following sections: Original Research, Paediatric Emergency Medicine, Disaster Medicine, Education and Training, Ethics, International Emergency Medicine, Management and Quality, Medicolegal Matters, Prehospital Care, Public Health, Rural and Remote Care, Technology, Toxicology and Trauma. Accepted papers become the copyright of the journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书