Deivis Nicolas Guzman-Tordecilla, Shivam Gupta, Shunsuke Mabuchi, Olga Bornemisza, Andres I Vecino-Ortiz
{"title":"The impact of investments in health systems: a rapid review of computational models.","authors":"Deivis Nicolas Guzman-Tordecilla, Shivam Gupta, Shunsuke Mabuchi, Olga Bornemisza, Andres I Vecino-Ortiz","doi":"10.1136/bmjgh-2025-020960","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Investments in health systems are essential for achieving effective sustainable and equitable health outcomes. However, national and global level stakeholders continue to grapple with how to quantify the impact of investments, its return of investment, and how to efficiently allocate health system inputs to improve health service delivery, health outputs and outcomes.This rapid review highlights the diverse computational models used to simulate investments in health systems strengthening. Our analysis revealed a range of methodologies, from agent-based simulations and dynamic computable general equilibrium models to structural equation models and the OneHealth Tool. Each model offers unique insights and has its strengths and limitations that need to be carefully considered for every scenario.A significant limitation across all models is the lack of external validation of the inputs and assumptions. The variability in data requirements and computational complexity also presents challenges in adapting these models to different contexts.To enhance the utility of these models, future research should focus on integrating ex-post impact evaluations and improving data collection to ensure accurate, context-specific inputs. Additionally, there is a need for better alignment between modelling results and policymaking processes to enhance the adoption and legitimacy among decision-makers of these tools.Overall, while current models provide valuable insights for planning and investment in health systems, addressing these limitations will be crucial for maximising their effectiveness and ensuring better-informed decision-making in health investments.</p>","PeriodicalId":9137,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Global Health","volume":"11 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13365743/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Global Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2025-020960","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Investments in health systems are essential for achieving effective sustainable and equitable health outcomes. However, national and global level stakeholders continue to grapple with how to quantify the impact of investments, its return of investment, and how to efficiently allocate health system inputs to improve health service delivery, health outputs and outcomes.This rapid review highlights the diverse computational models used to simulate investments in health systems strengthening. Our analysis revealed a range of methodologies, from agent-based simulations and dynamic computable general equilibrium models to structural equation models and the OneHealth Tool. Each model offers unique insights and has its strengths and limitations that need to be carefully considered for every scenario.A significant limitation across all models is the lack of external validation of the inputs and assumptions. The variability in data requirements and computational complexity also presents challenges in adapting these models to different contexts.To enhance the utility of these models, future research should focus on integrating ex-post impact evaluations and improving data collection to ensure accurate, context-specific inputs. Additionally, there is a need for better alignment between modelling results and policymaking processes to enhance the adoption and legitimacy among decision-makers of these tools.Overall, while current models provide valuable insights for planning and investment in health systems, addressing these limitations will be crucial for maximising their effectiveness and ensuring better-informed decision-making in health investments.
期刊介绍:
BMJ Global Health is an online Open Access journal from BMJ that focuses on publishing high-quality peer-reviewed content pertinent to individuals engaged in global health, including policy makers, funders, researchers, clinicians, and frontline healthcare workers. The journal encompasses all facets of global health, with a special emphasis on submissions addressing underfunded areas such as non-communicable diseases (NCDs). It welcomes research across all study phases and designs, from study protocols to phase I trials to meta-analyses, including small or specialized studies. The journal also encourages opinionated discussions on controversial topics.