The impact of investments in health systems: a rapid review of computational models.

IF 5.8 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Deivis Nicolas Guzman-Tordecilla, Shivam Gupta, Shunsuke Mabuchi, Olga Bornemisza, Andres I Vecino-Ortiz
{"title":"The impact of investments in health systems: a rapid review of computational models.","authors":"Deivis Nicolas Guzman-Tordecilla, Shivam Gupta, Shunsuke Mabuchi, Olga Bornemisza, Andres I Vecino-Ortiz","doi":"10.1136/bmjgh-2025-020960","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Investments in health systems are essential for achieving effective sustainable and equitable health outcomes. However, national and global level stakeholders continue to grapple with how to quantify the impact of investments, its return of investment, and how to efficiently allocate health system inputs to improve health service delivery, health outputs and outcomes.This rapid review highlights the diverse computational models used to simulate investments in health systems strengthening. Our analysis revealed a range of methodologies, from agent-based simulations and dynamic computable general equilibrium models to structural equation models and the OneHealth Tool. Each model offers unique insights and has its strengths and limitations that need to be carefully considered for every scenario.A significant limitation across all models is the lack of external validation of the inputs and assumptions. The variability in data requirements and computational complexity also presents challenges in adapting these models to different contexts.To enhance the utility of these models, future research should focus on integrating ex-post impact evaluations and improving data collection to ensure accurate, context-specific inputs. Additionally, there is a need for better alignment between modelling results and policymaking processes to enhance the adoption and legitimacy among decision-makers of these tools.Overall, while current models provide valuable insights for planning and investment in health systems, addressing these limitations will be crucial for maximising their effectiveness and ensuring better-informed decision-making in health investments.</p>","PeriodicalId":9137,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Global Health","volume":"11 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13365743/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Global Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2025-020960","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Investments in health systems are essential for achieving effective sustainable and equitable health outcomes. However, national and global level stakeholders continue to grapple with how to quantify the impact of investments, its return of investment, and how to efficiently allocate health system inputs to improve health service delivery, health outputs and outcomes.This rapid review highlights the diverse computational models used to simulate investments in health systems strengthening. Our analysis revealed a range of methodologies, from agent-based simulations and dynamic computable general equilibrium models to structural equation models and the OneHealth Tool. Each model offers unique insights and has its strengths and limitations that need to be carefully considered for every scenario.A significant limitation across all models is the lack of external validation of the inputs and assumptions. The variability in data requirements and computational complexity also presents challenges in adapting these models to different contexts.To enhance the utility of these models, future research should focus on integrating ex-post impact evaluations and improving data collection to ensure accurate, context-specific inputs. Additionally, there is a need for better alignment between modelling results and policymaking processes to enhance the adoption and legitimacy among decision-makers of these tools.Overall, while current models provide valuable insights for planning and investment in health systems, addressing these limitations will be crucial for maximising their effectiveness and ensuring better-informed decision-making in health investments.

卫生系统投资的影响:对计算模型的快速审查。
对卫生系统的投资对于实现有效、可持续和公平的卫生结果至关重要。然而,国家和全球层面的利益攸关方仍在努力解决如何量化投资的影响及其投资回报,以及如何有效分配卫生系统投入,以改善卫生服务的提供、卫生产出和成果等问题。这一快速回顾突出了用于模拟卫生系统加强投资的各种计算模型。我们的分析揭示了一系列方法,从基于主体的模拟和动态可计算的一般平衡模型到结构方程模型和OneHealth工具。每个模型都提供了独特的见解,并有其优点和局限性,需要仔细考虑每个场景。所有模型的一个重要限制是缺乏输入和假设的外部验证。数据需求的可变性和计算复杂性也给这些模型适应不同的环境带来了挑战。为了提高这些模型的效用,未来的研究应侧重于整合事后影响评价和改进数据收集,以确保准确的、具体情况的输入。此外,还需要更好地协调建模结果和决策过程,以提高决策者对这些工具的采用和合法性。总的来说,虽然目前的模型为卫生系统的规划和投资提供了宝贵的见解,但解决这些限制对于最大限度地提高其有效性和确保在卫生投资中做出更明智的决策至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMJ Global Health
BMJ Global Health Medicine-Health Policy
CiteScore
11.40
自引率
4.90%
发文量
429
审稿时长
18 weeks
期刊介绍: BMJ Global Health is an online Open Access journal from BMJ that focuses on publishing high-quality peer-reviewed content pertinent to individuals engaged in global health, including policy makers, funders, researchers, clinicians, and frontline healthcare workers. The journal encompasses all facets of global health, with a special emphasis on submissions addressing underfunded areas such as non-communicable diseases (NCDs). It welcomes research across all study phases and designs, from study protocols to phase I trials to meta-analyses, including small or specialized studies. The journal also encourages opinionated discussions on controversial topics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书