Early childhood exposure to general anesthesia and subsequent risk of learning disabilities: a systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies.

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Huimin Zhou, Yadong Jin, Hao Zhou, Xin Chen, Hoi Yan Mak, Hamdan Hamdan, Chaoxuan Dong
{"title":"Early childhood exposure to general anesthesia and subsequent risk of learning disabilities: a systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies.","authors":"Huimin Zhou, Yadong Jin, Hao Zhou, Xin Chen, Hoi Yan Mak, Hamdan Hamdan, Chaoxuan Dong","doi":"10.1186/s12871-026-04096-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Potential neurodevelopmental consequences of early childhood exposure to general anesthesia (GA) remain uncertain, with existing studies reporting inconsistent findings regarding later learning disabilities (LDs). This meta-analysis assessed whether early childhood exposure to general anesthesia is associated with subsequent LDs and whether risks differ by exposure frequency, duration, or LD subtype.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>PubMed, Embase, Ovid, CINAHL, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library were searched from inception to September 1, 2024. Cohort studies reporting LD outcomes after early childhood GA exposure were included. The primary meta-analysis was restricted to independent cohorts to avoid double-counting participants, whereas overlapping cohorts and studies reporting non-clinical educational outcomes were analyzed separately in sensitivity or secondary analyses. Random-effects models were used to pool risk ratios (RRs), study quality was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale, and certainty of evidence was evaluated using GRADE.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seven cohort studies comprising 167,848 children were analyzed. The primary meta-analysis, restricted to three independent cohorts reporting clinically diagnosed learning disabilities (LDs), showed that early childhood exposure to general anesthesia (GA) was associated with an increased risk of subsequent LDs (RR = 1.23, 95% CI: 1.06-1.43). Exploratory subgroup analyses showed no significant association following a single GA exposure (RR = 1.02, 95% CI: 0.89-1.16), whereas multiple GA exposures were associated with a significantly increased risk of LDs (RR = 2.29, 95% CI: 1.72-3.05). Similarly, no increased risk was observed for GA durations shorter than 60 min, whereas exposures longer than 60 min were associated with progressively higher risk estimates. The certainty of evidence ranged from very low to moderate, with low-certainty evidence for the primary outcome.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Low-certainty evidence suggests that early childhood exposure to GA is associated with an increased risk of subsequent LDs, with larger pooled effect estimates observed following repeated or prolonged exposures. These findings should be interpreted cautiously because residual confounding related to underlying disease, surgical complexity, and hospitalization cannot be excluded. In addition, all included cohorts comprised children born in 2000 or earlier; therefore, the findings may not fully reflect contemporary pediatric anesthesia practice. Further well-designed prospective studies are required.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>PROSPERO, CRD42024603831.</p>","PeriodicalId":9190,"journal":{"name":"BMC Anesthesiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13644082/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Anesthesiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12871-026-04096-0","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Potential neurodevelopmental consequences of early childhood exposure to general anesthesia (GA) remain uncertain, with existing studies reporting inconsistent findings regarding later learning disabilities (LDs). This meta-analysis assessed whether early childhood exposure to general anesthesia is associated with subsequent LDs and whether risks differ by exposure frequency, duration, or LD subtype.

Methods: PubMed, Embase, Ovid, CINAHL, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library were searched from inception to September 1, 2024. Cohort studies reporting LD outcomes after early childhood GA exposure were included. The primary meta-analysis was restricted to independent cohorts to avoid double-counting participants, whereas overlapping cohorts and studies reporting non-clinical educational outcomes were analyzed separately in sensitivity or secondary analyses. Random-effects models were used to pool risk ratios (RRs), study quality was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale, and certainty of evidence was evaluated using GRADE.

Results: Seven cohort studies comprising 167,848 children were analyzed. The primary meta-analysis, restricted to three independent cohorts reporting clinically diagnosed learning disabilities (LDs), showed that early childhood exposure to general anesthesia (GA) was associated with an increased risk of subsequent LDs (RR = 1.23, 95% CI: 1.06-1.43). Exploratory subgroup analyses showed no significant association following a single GA exposure (RR = 1.02, 95% CI: 0.89-1.16), whereas multiple GA exposures were associated with a significantly increased risk of LDs (RR = 2.29, 95% CI: 1.72-3.05). Similarly, no increased risk was observed for GA durations shorter than 60 min, whereas exposures longer than 60 min were associated with progressively higher risk estimates. The certainty of evidence ranged from very low to moderate, with low-certainty evidence for the primary outcome.

Conclusion: Low-certainty evidence suggests that early childhood exposure to GA is associated with an increased risk of subsequent LDs, with larger pooled effect estimates observed following repeated or prolonged exposures. These findings should be interpreted cautiously because residual confounding related to underlying disease, surgical complexity, and hospitalization cannot be excluded. In addition, all included cohorts comprised children born in 2000 or earlier; therefore, the findings may not fully reflect contemporary pediatric anesthesia practice. Further well-designed prospective studies are required.

Trial registration: PROSPERO, CRD42024603831.

儿童早期接受全身麻醉和随后的学习障碍风险:队列研究的系统回顾和荟萃分析。
背景:儿童早期暴露于全身麻醉(GA)的潜在神经发育后果仍然不确定,现有研究报告的关于后期学习障碍(ld)的结果不一致。这项荟萃分析评估了儿童早期全身麻醉暴露是否与随后的LD相关,以及暴露频率、持续时间或LD亚型是否存在风险差异。方法:检索PubMed、Embase、Ovid、CINAHL、Web of Science、Cochrane Library自成立至2024年9月1日的文献。报告儿童早期GA暴露后LD结果的队列研究被纳入。主要荟萃分析仅限于独立队列,以避免重复计算参与者,而重叠队列和报告非临床教育结果的研究在敏感性或次要分析中分别进行分析。随机效应模型用于汇总风险比(rr),使用纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表评估研究质量,并使用GRADE评估证据的确定性。结果:分析了7项队列研究,包括167,848名儿童。主要荟萃分析仅限于三个报告临床诊断为学习障碍(LDs)的独立队列,结果显示,儿童早期接受全身麻醉(GA)与随后发生LDs的风险增加相关(RR = 1.23, 95% CI: 1.06-1.43)。探索性亚组分析显示,单次GA暴露与ld风险无显著相关性(RR = 1.02, 95% CI: 0.89-1.16),而多次GA暴露与ld风险显著增加相关(RR = 2.29, 95% CI: 1.72-3.05)。同样,GA持续时间短于60分钟没有观察到风险增加,而暴露时间长于60分钟则与风险估计逐渐升高相关。证据的确定性从极低到中等,主要结局证据的确定性较低。结论:低确定性证据表明,儿童早期暴露于GA与随后的ld风险增加有关,在重复或长时间暴露后观察到更大的综合效应估计。这些发现应谨慎解释,因为不能排除与潜在疾病、手术复杂性和住院有关的残留混杂因素。此外,所有纳入的队列都包括2000年或更早出生的儿童;因此,研究结果可能不能完全反映当代儿科麻醉实践。需要进一步精心设计的前瞻性研究。试验注册:普洛斯彼罗,CRD42024603831。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Anesthesiology
BMC Anesthesiology ANESTHESIOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
4.50%
发文量
349
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Anesthesiology is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of anesthesiology, critical care, perioperative care and pain management, including clinical and experimental research into anesthetic mechanisms, administration and efficacy, technology and monitoring, and associated economic issues.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书