Effectiveness and safety of enfortumab vedotin and pembrolizumab in a real-world patient population with urothelial carcinoma: results from a multi-institutional cohort (GUARDIANS).

IF 5.1
Stefanie Zschäbitz, Irfan Bhatti, Jozefina Casuscelli, Ludwig Otto Pachmayr, Thomas Büttner, Thomas Elegeert, Nina Holzwarth, Severin Rodler, Martin Hennig, Emily Rinderknecht, Muammar Dib, Katrin Schlack, Christopher Darr, Anna-Lisa Volk, Philipp Schmucker, Friedemann Zengerling, Pia Paffenholz, Joschka Heil, Eva Erne, Subhajit Mandal, Frederik Wessels, Thea Maria Busse, Daniel Seidl, Susan Foller, Alexander Höllein, Tim Nestler, Christian Gratzke, Louis Rhode, Jakob Kohler, Günter Niegisch, Anna Katharina Seitz, Julia Heinzelbecker, Niklas Klümper, Margitta Retz, Viktor Grünwald, Can Aydogdu, Marco Julius Schnabel
{"title":"Effectiveness and safety of enfortumab vedotin and pembrolizumab in a real-world patient population with urothelial carcinoma: results from a multi-institutional cohort (GUARDIANS).","authors":"Stefanie Zschäbitz, Irfan Bhatti, Jozefina Casuscelli, Ludwig Otto Pachmayr, Thomas Büttner, Thomas Elegeert, Nina Holzwarth, Severin Rodler, Martin Hennig, Emily Rinderknecht, Muammar Dib, Katrin Schlack, Christopher Darr, Anna-Lisa Volk, Philipp Schmucker, Friedemann Zengerling, Pia Paffenholz, Joschka Heil, Eva Erne, Subhajit Mandal, Frederik Wessels, Thea Maria Busse, Daniel Seidl, Susan Foller, Alexander Höllein, Tim Nestler, Christian Gratzke, Louis Rhode, Jakob Kohler, Günter Niegisch, Anna Katharina Seitz, Julia Heinzelbecker, Niklas Klümper, Margitta Retz, Viktor Grünwald, Can Aydogdu, Marco Julius Schnabel","doi":"10.1007/s00262-026-04448-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Enfortumab vedotin plus pembrolizumab (EVP) is the standard first-line treatment for metastatic or locally advanced urothelial carcinoma (m/laUC). Real-world patients frequently present with unfavorable clinical characteristics, raising uncertainty about whether outcomes mirror those of the pivotal EV-302/KEYNOTE-A39 trial. This study assessed effectiveness and safety of EVP in a real-world cohort of patients with m/laUC.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Retrospective multicenter study including patients treated with EVP across 25 German hospitals (between 03/2022 and 08/2025). Treatment delivery and monitoring followed local clinical standards. Adverse events (AEs) were documented per CTCAE v5.0. Responses were assessed locally using RECIST v1.1. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were analyzed using Kaplan-Meier methodology.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 468 patients (median age = 69 years) were included. The overall response rate (ORR) was 50.2% (partial response:37.4%, complete response:12.8%). Median PFS was 10.2 months (95%CI,8.0-12.7). 12-month and 24-month OS rates were 71.9% and 60.6%, respectively. ECOG PS 0-1 and occurrence of skin toxicity were associated with improved outcomes. Any-grade AEs occurred in 81.8% and grade ≥ 3 AEs in 35.8%. Peripheral sensory neuropathy and skin toxicity were the most common AEs. Ten treatment-related fatal events were recorded.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>EVP demonstrated robust effectiveness and manageable toxicity in a large and diverse real-world cohort including patients with divergent histology. Skin toxicity was associated with superior ORR, PFS, and OS. Our findings support EVP as an effective first-line option for patients with m/laUC treated outside clinical trials.</p>","PeriodicalId":520581,"journal":{"name":"Cancer immunology, immunotherapy : CII","volume":"75 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13365084/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer immunology, immunotherapy : CII","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00262-026-04448-2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Enfortumab vedotin plus pembrolizumab (EVP) is the standard first-line treatment for metastatic or locally advanced urothelial carcinoma (m/laUC). Real-world patients frequently present with unfavorable clinical characteristics, raising uncertainty about whether outcomes mirror those of the pivotal EV-302/KEYNOTE-A39 trial. This study assessed effectiveness and safety of EVP in a real-world cohort of patients with m/laUC.

Materials and methods: Retrospective multicenter study including patients treated with EVP across 25 German hospitals (between 03/2022 and 08/2025). Treatment delivery and monitoring followed local clinical standards. Adverse events (AEs) were documented per CTCAE v5.0. Responses were assessed locally using RECIST v1.1. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were analyzed using Kaplan-Meier methodology.

Results: A total of 468 patients (median age = 69 years) were included. The overall response rate (ORR) was 50.2% (partial response:37.4%, complete response:12.8%). Median PFS was 10.2 months (95%CI,8.0-12.7). 12-month and 24-month OS rates were 71.9% and 60.6%, respectively. ECOG PS 0-1 and occurrence of skin toxicity were associated with improved outcomes. Any-grade AEs occurred in 81.8% and grade ≥ 3 AEs in 35.8%. Peripheral sensory neuropathy and skin toxicity were the most common AEs. Ten treatment-related fatal events were recorded.

Conclusions: EVP demonstrated robust effectiveness and manageable toxicity in a large and diverse real-world cohort including patients with divergent histology. Skin toxicity was associated with superior ORR, PFS, and OS. Our findings support EVP as an effective first-line option for patients with m/laUC treated outside clinical trials.

来自多机构队列研究(GUARDIANS)的结果:在现实世界尿路上皮癌患者群体中,enfortumab vedotin和pembrolizumab的有效性和安全性
Enfortumab vedotin + pembrolizumab (EVP)是转移性或局部晚期尿路上皮癌(m/laUC)的标准一线治疗。现实世界的患者经常表现出不利的临床特征,这增加了结果是否反映关键EV-302/KEYNOTE-A39试验的不确定性。本研究评估了EVP在真实世界m/laUC患者队列中的有效性和安全性。材料和方法:回顾性多中心研究,包括25家德国医院(2022年3月至2025年8月)接受EVP治疗的患者。按照当地临床标准提供治疗和监测。不良事件(ae)按CTCAE v5.0记录。使用RECIST v1.1对响应进行本地评估。采用Kaplan-Meier方法分析无进展生存期(PFS)和总生存期(OS)。结果:共纳入468例患者(中位年龄69岁)。总缓解率(ORR)为50.2%(部分缓解:37.4%,完全缓解:12.8%)。中位PFS为10.2个月(95%CI,8.0-12.7)。12个月和24个月的OS率分别为71.9%和60.6%。ECOG PS 0-1和皮肤毒性的发生与预后的改善有关。81.8%发生任意级ae, 35.8%发生≥3级ae。外周感觉神经病变和皮肤毒性是最常见的ae。记录了10例与治疗相关的死亡事件。结论:EVP在包括不同组织学患者在内的大型多样化现实世界队列中显示出强大的有效性和可控的毒性。皮肤毒性与较高的ORR、PFS和OS相关。我们的研究结果支持EVP作为临床试验外治疗m/laUC患者的有效一线选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书