Preliminary feasibility of SHURUI single-port robot-assisted radical cystectomy with exploratory comparison to a contemporaneous da Vinci Xi single-port cohort.

IF 5.1 2区 医学 Q1 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Qingyi Zhu, Jun Wang, Yong Wei, Wei Liu, Luming Shen, Christian D Fankhauser, Min Gu
{"title":"Preliminary feasibility of SHURUI single-port robot-assisted radical cystectomy with exploratory comparison to a contemporaneous da Vinci Xi single-port cohort.","authors":"Qingyi Zhu, Jun Wang, Yong Wei, Wei Liu, Luming Shen, Christian D Fankhauser, Min Gu","doi":"10.23736/S2724-6051.26.06898-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Single-port robot-assisted surgery represents the latest advancement in minimally invasive urological oncology. The SHURUI single-port (SP) surgical robot system recently received approval as a second SP system and as alternative to the Da Vinci platform. We report the first comparison of the two systems in radical cystectomy patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective comparative study at a tertiary referral center comparing operative and oncological outcomes in consecutive patients with bladder cancer who underwent single incision radical cystectomy using either the SHURUI SP-SR system or the Da Vinci Xi system.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We treated eleven patients using the SHURUI SP-SR system and 24 patients using the Da Vinci Xi system. We successfully completed all procedures without conversion. Baseline characteristics were generally similar between groups, and short-term perioperative, postoperative recovery, complication, and pathological outcomes were broadly comparable. No unexpected safety concerns were identified. Study limitations include small sample size, single-surgeon experience, retrospective design, and short follow-up.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We demonstrated that in the first experiences SHURUI SP achieves comparable perioperative safety and efficacy to Da Vinci Xi for single incision radical cystectomy. Our findings support SHURUI as a potential alternative, potentially expanding robotic surgery access.</p>","PeriodicalId":53228,"journal":{"name":"Minerva Urology and Nephrology","volume":"78 3","pages":"383-388"},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Minerva Urology and Nephrology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23736/S2724-6051.26.06898-9","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Single-port robot-assisted surgery represents the latest advancement in minimally invasive urological oncology. The SHURUI single-port (SP) surgical robot system recently received approval as a second SP system and as alternative to the Da Vinci platform. We report the first comparison of the two systems in radical cystectomy patients.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective comparative study at a tertiary referral center comparing operative and oncological outcomes in consecutive patients with bladder cancer who underwent single incision radical cystectomy using either the SHURUI SP-SR system or the Da Vinci Xi system.

Results: We treated eleven patients using the SHURUI SP-SR system and 24 patients using the Da Vinci Xi system. We successfully completed all procedures without conversion. Baseline characteristics were generally similar between groups, and short-term perioperative, postoperative recovery, complication, and pathological outcomes were broadly comparable. No unexpected safety concerns were identified. Study limitations include small sample size, single-surgeon experience, retrospective design, and short follow-up.

Conclusions: We demonstrated that in the first experiences SHURUI SP achieves comparable perioperative safety and efficacy to Da Vinci Xi for single incision radical cystectomy. Our findings support SHURUI as a potential alternative, potentially expanding robotic surgery access.

SHURUI单孔机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术的初步可行性,并与同期达芬奇Xi单孔队列进行探索性比较。
背景:单端口机器人辅助手术代表了微创泌尿肿瘤学的最新进展。SHURUI单端口(SP)手术机器人系统最近被批准为第二个SP系统,并作为达芬奇平台的替代方案。我们报告了两种系统在根治性膀胱切除术患者中的首次比较。方法:我们在一家三级转诊中心进行了一项回顾性比较研究,比较了连续接受单切口膀胱根治术的膀胱癌患者的手术和肿瘤结果,这些患者分别使用SHURUI SP-SR系统或Da Vinci Xi系统。结果:11例患者采用舒瑞SP-SR系统,24例患者采用达芬奇Xi系统。我们成功地完成了所有的程序,没有转换。两组的基线特征基本相似,短期围手术期、术后恢复、并发症和病理结果大致相似。没有发现意外的安全隐患。研究的局限性包括样本量小、单一外科医生经验、回顾性设计和随访时间短。结论:我们在首次经验中证明,SHURUI SP在单切口根治性膀胱切除术中的围手术期安全性和有效性与达芬奇Xi相当。我们的研究结果支持SHURUI作为潜在的替代方案,有可能扩大机器人手术的使用范围。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Minerva Urology and Nephrology
Minerva Urology and Nephrology UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
32.70%
发文量
237
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书