Suture-suspension single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus conventional multiport laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a single-center, prospective, randomized controlled clinical study.

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY
Yingan Zhao, Shuai Han, Jinghui Zhang, Yini Xu, Jianfeng Lu, Siming Zheng
{"title":"Suture-suspension single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus conventional multiport laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a single-center, prospective, randomized controlled clinical study.","authors":"Yingan Zhao, Shuai Han, Jinghui Zhang, Yini Xu, Jianfeng Lu, Siming Zheng","doi":"10.1007/s00423-026-04127-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy (SILC) shows superior cosmetic outcomes but greater technical difficulty. This study aimed to compare the short-term outcomes of the suture-suspension SILC versus conventional conventional multiport laparoscopic cholecystectomy (CMLC) and to analyze the risk factors of difficult SILC.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>From October 2023 to September 2024, 120 patients with symptomatic cholelithiasis were enrolled and randomly assigned to either the suture-suspension SILC group (60 patients) or the conventional CMLC group (60 patients). The primary outcome was operative time. Secondary outcomes included intra-operative blood loss, postoperative hospitalization duration, time to first flatus, 24-hour postoperative pain score, incidence of postoperative complications (bile leakage, hemorrhage, wound infection), and subjective satisfaction.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Compared to the conventional CMLC, suture-suspension SILC showed no significant differences in operative time (P > 0.05) or intra-operative blood loss (P > 0.05). However, the time to first flatus (1.20 ± 0.443 days), duration of postoperative hospitalization (1.58 ± 0.889 days), and the 24-hour postoperative pain score (3.92 ± 1.225) in the suture-suspension SILC group were all significantly lower than those in the CMLC group (P ≤ 0.05). The subjective satisfaction score (3.98 ± 0.431 points) in the suture-suspension SILC group was significantly higher than that in the CMLC group (3.32 ± 0.469 points, P < 0.001). No postoperative complications occurred in either group. Thickened gallbladder wall, elevated white blood cell (WBC) count, and pericholecystic effusion were identified as factors associated with the operative time of SILC (P ≤ 0.05). A gallbladder wall thickness exceeding 4.375 mm was associated with an operative time longer than the average for the suture-suspension SILC procedure.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The suture-suspension method renders SILC short-term outcomes comparable to those of conventional CMLC. However, the choice of surgical technique should be made cautiously in cases of severe gallbladder inflammation.</p>","PeriodicalId":17983,"journal":{"name":"Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13368970/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-026-04127-x","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy (SILC) shows superior cosmetic outcomes but greater technical difficulty. This study aimed to compare the short-term outcomes of the suture-suspension SILC versus conventional conventional multiport laparoscopic cholecystectomy (CMLC) and to analyze the risk factors of difficult SILC.

Methods: From October 2023 to September 2024, 120 patients with symptomatic cholelithiasis were enrolled and randomly assigned to either the suture-suspension SILC group (60 patients) or the conventional CMLC group (60 patients). The primary outcome was operative time. Secondary outcomes included intra-operative blood loss, postoperative hospitalization duration, time to first flatus, 24-hour postoperative pain score, incidence of postoperative complications (bile leakage, hemorrhage, wound infection), and subjective satisfaction.

Results: Compared to the conventional CMLC, suture-suspension SILC showed no significant differences in operative time (P > 0.05) or intra-operative blood loss (P > 0.05). However, the time to first flatus (1.20 ± 0.443 days), duration of postoperative hospitalization (1.58 ± 0.889 days), and the 24-hour postoperative pain score (3.92 ± 1.225) in the suture-suspension SILC group were all significantly lower than those in the CMLC group (P ≤ 0.05). The subjective satisfaction score (3.98 ± 0.431 points) in the suture-suspension SILC group was significantly higher than that in the CMLC group (3.32 ± 0.469 points, P < 0.001). No postoperative complications occurred in either group. Thickened gallbladder wall, elevated white blood cell (WBC) count, and pericholecystic effusion were identified as factors associated with the operative time of SILC (P ≤ 0.05). A gallbladder wall thickness exceeding 4.375 mm was associated with an operative time longer than the average for the suture-suspension SILC procedure.

Conclusion: The suture-suspension method renders SILC short-term outcomes comparable to those of conventional CMLC. However, the choice of surgical technique should be made cautiously in cases of severe gallbladder inflammation.

缝合悬吊式单切口腹腔镜胆囊切除术与传统多口腹腔镜胆囊切除术:一项单中心、前瞻性、随机对照临床研究
目的:单切口腹腔镜胆囊切除术(SILC)具有良好的美容效果,但技术难度较大。本研究旨在比较缝合悬吊式腹腔镜胆囊切除术(SILC)与常规多口腹腔镜胆囊切除术(CMLC)的短期疗效,并分析困难SILC的危险因素。方法:从2023年10月至2024年9月,纳入120例有症状的胆石症患者,随机分为缝合-悬置SILC组(60例)和常规CMLC组(60例)。主要观察指标为手术时间。次要结局包括术中出血量、术后住院时间、首次放屁时间、术后24小时疼痛评分、术后并发症(胆漏、出血、伤口感染)发生率和主观满意度。结果:与常规CMLC相比,缝合悬吊式SILC在手术时间(P > 0.05)和术中出血量(P > 0.05)方面无显著差异。但缝线悬吊SILC组首次排气时间(1.20±0.443天)、术后住院时间(1.58±0.889天)、术后24小时疼痛评分(3.92±1.225)均显著低于CMLC组(P≤0.05)。缝合悬吊式SILC组主观满意度评分(3.98±0.431分)显著高于CMLC组(3.32±0.469分),P值显著高于CMLC组(3.32±0.469分)。结论:缝合悬吊法SILC近期疗效与常规CMLC相当。然而,在胆囊严重炎症的情况下,手术技术的选择应谨慎。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
8.70%
发文量
342
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Langenbeck''s Archives of Surgery aims to publish the best results in the field of clinical surgery and basic surgical research. The main focus is on providing the highest level of clinical research and clinically relevant basic research. The journal, published exclusively in English, will provide an international discussion forum for the controlled results of clinical surgery. The majority of published contributions will be original articles reporting on clinical data from general and visceral surgery, while endocrine surgery will also be covered. Papers on basic surgical principles from the fields of traumatology, vascular and thoracic surgery are also welcome. Evidence-based medicine is an important criterion for the acceptance of papers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书