{"title":"Suture-suspension single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus conventional multiport laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a single-center, prospective, randomized controlled clinical study.","authors":"Yingan Zhao, Shuai Han, Jinghui Zhang, Yini Xu, Jianfeng Lu, Siming Zheng","doi":"10.1007/s00423-026-04127-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy (SILC) shows superior cosmetic outcomes but greater technical difficulty. This study aimed to compare the short-term outcomes of the suture-suspension SILC versus conventional conventional multiport laparoscopic cholecystectomy (CMLC) and to analyze the risk factors of difficult SILC.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>From October 2023 to September 2024, 120 patients with symptomatic cholelithiasis were enrolled and randomly assigned to either the suture-suspension SILC group (60 patients) or the conventional CMLC group (60 patients). The primary outcome was operative time. Secondary outcomes included intra-operative blood loss, postoperative hospitalization duration, time to first flatus, 24-hour postoperative pain score, incidence of postoperative complications (bile leakage, hemorrhage, wound infection), and subjective satisfaction.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Compared to the conventional CMLC, suture-suspension SILC showed no significant differences in operative time (P > 0.05) or intra-operative blood loss (P > 0.05). However, the time to first flatus (1.20 ± 0.443 days), duration of postoperative hospitalization (1.58 ± 0.889 days), and the 24-hour postoperative pain score (3.92 ± 1.225) in the suture-suspension SILC group were all significantly lower than those in the CMLC group (P ≤ 0.05). The subjective satisfaction score (3.98 ± 0.431 points) in the suture-suspension SILC group was significantly higher than that in the CMLC group (3.32 ± 0.469 points, P < 0.001). No postoperative complications occurred in either group. Thickened gallbladder wall, elevated white blood cell (WBC) count, and pericholecystic effusion were identified as factors associated with the operative time of SILC (P ≤ 0.05). A gallbladder wall thickness exceeding 4.375 mm was associated with an operative time longer than the average for the suture-suspension SILC procedure.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The suture-suspension method renders SILC short-term outcomes comparable to those of conventional CMLC. However, the choice of surgical technique should be made cautiously in cases of severe gallbladder inflammation.</p>","PeriodicalId":17983,"journal":{"name":"Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13368970/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-026-04127-x","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy (SILC) shows superior cosmetic outcomes but greater technical difficulty. This study aimed to compare the short-term outcomes of the suture-suspension SILC versus conventional conventional multiport laparoscopic cholecystectomy (CMLC) and to analyze the risk factors of difficult SILC.
Methods: From October 2023 to September 2024, 120 patients with symptomatic cholelithiasis were enrolled and randomly assigned to either the suture-suspension SILC group (60 patients) or the conventional CMLC group (60 patients). The primary outcome was operative time. Secondary outcomes included intra-operative blood loss, postoperative hospitalization duration, time to first flatus, 24-hour postoperative pain score, incidence of postoperative complications (bile leakage, hemorrhage, wound infection), and subjective satisfaction.
Results: Compared to the conventional CMLC, suture-suspension SILC showed no significant differences in operative time (P > 0.05) or intra-operative blood loss (P > 0.05). However, the time to first flatus (1.20 ± 0.443 days), duration of postoperative hospitalization (1.58 ± 0.889 days), and the 24-hour postoperative pain score (3.92 ± 1.225) in the suture-suspension SILC group were all significantly lower than those in the CMLC group (P ≤ 0.05). The subjective satisfaction score (3.98 ± 0.431 points) in the suture-suspension SILC group was significantly higher than that in the CMLC group (3.32 ± 0.469 points, P < 0.001). No postoperative complications occurred in either group. Thickened gallbladder wall, elevated white blood cell (WBC) count, and pericholecystic effusion were identified as factors associated with the operative time of SILC (P ≤ 0.05). A gallbladder wall thickness exceeding 4.375 mm was associated with an operative time longer than the average for the suture-suspension SILC procedure.
Conclusion: The suture-suspension method renders SILC short-term outcomes comparable to those of conventional CMLC. However, the choice of surgical technique should be made cautiously in cases of severe gallbladder inflammation.
期刊介绍:
Langenbeck''s Archives of Surgery aims to publish the best results in the field of clinical surgery and basic surgical research. The main focus is on providing the highest level of clinical research and clinically relevant basic research. The journal, published exclusively in English, will provide an international discussion forum for the controlled results of clinical surgery. The majority of published contributions will be original articles reporting on clinical data from general and visceral surgery, while endocrine surgery will also be covered. Papers on basic surgical principles from the fields of traumatology, vascular and thoracic surgery are also welcome. Evidence-based medicine is an important criterion for the acceptance of papers.