From 'Lack of Insight' to Being a Knower: A Personal Turning Point in Psychiatric Inpatient Care.

IF 3.1 4区 医学 Q1 NURSING
Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing Pub Date : 2026-10-01 Epub Date: 2026-07-09 DOI:10.1111/jpm.70175
Jennie Moberg
{"title":"From 'Lack of Insight' to Being a Knower: A Personal Turning Point in Psychiatric Inpatient Care.","authors":"Jennie Moberg","doi":"10.1111/jpm.70175","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>At times, the psychiatric inpatient system pathologizes patient perspectives as 'lack of insight', framing survival strategies as DSM symptoms. In these moments, power imbalances emerge that risk silencing patients' experiential knowledge.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This autoethnography reflects on my journey from invalidated patient to 'knower' to underscore the need for curiosity-driven, person-centred practices that validate lived wisdom in mental health recovery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A first-person autoethnographic narrative draws on lived experience of inpatient care, including periods of compulsory treatment during severe anorexia and post-ECT amnesia, combined with retrospective reflection and critical engagement with psychiatric literature and power dynamics.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>When patients' voices are ignored, recovery stalls, risking internalized illness identities. Reclaiming narrative through writing enables 'double recovery'-from suffering and systemic marginalization. This fosters equality through questions like 'How do you understand your experience?'-a stark contrast to DSM's symptom-focused framing.</p><p><strong>Relevance to mental health nursing: </strong>Drawing on my experience of inpatient care, mental health nursing can help shift psychiatric practice towards a more collaborative approach that actively incorporates patients' own explanations into assessment, documentation and care planning. This can begin by asking how patients understand what is happening, recording their own explanations alongside clinical observations and co-designing goals that align with patients' priorities. In doing so, staff can better recognize survival strategies as meaningful responses to distress and strengthen trust through more person-centred practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":50076,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing","volume":" ","pages":"935-938"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13551267/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jpm.70175","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/7/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: At times, the psychiatric inpatient system pathologizes patient perspectives as 'lack of insight', framing survival strategies as DSM symptoms. In these moments, power imbalances emerge that risk silencing patients' experiential knowledge.

Purpose: This autoethnography reflects on my journey from invalidated patient to 'knower' to underscore the need for curiosity-driven, person-centred practices that validate lived wisdom in mental health recovery.

Methods: A first-person autoethnographic narrative draws on lived experience of inpatient care, including periods of compulsory treatment during severe anorexia and post-ECT amnesia, combined with retrospective reflection and critical engagement with psychiatric literature and power dynamics.

Findings: When patients' voices are ignored, recovery stalls, risking internalized illness identities. Reclaiming narrative through writing enables 'double recovery'-from suffering and systemic marginalization. This fosters equality through questions like 'How do you understand your experience?'-a stark contrast to DSM's symptom-focused framing.

Relevance to mental health nursing: Drawing on my experience of inpatient care, mental health nursing can help shift psychiatric practice towards a more collaborative approach that actively incorporates patients' own explanations into assessment, documentation and care planning. This can begin by asking how patients understand what is happening, recording their own explanations alongside clinical observations and co-designing goals that align with patients' priorities. In doing so, staff can better recognize survival strategies as meaningful responses to distress and strengthen trust through more person-centred practice.

从“缺乏洞察力”到成为一个知者:精神科住院病人护理的个人转折点。
背景:有时,精神科住院病人系统将患者的观点病理化为“缺乏洞察力”,将生存策略定义为DSM症状。在这些时刻,权力失衡会出现,可能会使患者的经验知识沉默。目的:这本自我民族志反映了我从残疾病人到“知者”的旅程,强调了好奇心驱动、以人为本的实践的必要性,这些实践验证了精神健康康复中的生活智慧。方法:以第一人称自述的方式叙述住院治疗的生活经历,包括在严重厌食症和ect后失忆期间的强制治疗,结合回顾性反思和对精神病学文献和权力动力学的批判性参与。研究发现:当患者的声音被忽视时,康复会停滞,有可能内化疾病身份。通过写作收回叙事,可以实现“双重恢复”——从苦难和系统性边缘化中恢复。通过诸如“你如何理解你的经历?”这与DSM以症状为中心的框架形成鲜明对比。与心理健康护理相关:根据我的住院护理经验,心理健康护理可以帮助精神病学实践转向一种更加协作的方式,积极地将患者自己的解释纳入评估、记录和护理计划中。这可以从询问患者如何理解正在发生的事情开始,记录他们自己的解释以及临床观察和与患者优先考虑的共同设计目标。这样,工作人员可以更好地认识到生存战略是对痛苦的有意义的反应,并通过更以人为本的做法加强信任。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
3.70%
发文量
75
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing is an international journal which publishes research and scholarly papers that advance the development of policy, practice, research and education in all aspects of mental health nursing. We publish rigorously conducted research, literature reviews, essays and debates, and consumer practitioner narratives; all of which add new knowledge and advance practice globally. All papers must have clear implications for mental health nursing either solely or part of multidisciplinary practice. Papers are welcomed which draw on single or multiple research and academic disciplines. We give space to practitioner and consumer perspectives and ensure research published in the journal can be understood by a wide audience. We encourage critical debate and exchange of ideas and therefore welcome letters to the editor and essays and debates in mental health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书