Mind over medicine - Psychological interventions for preoperative anxiety: A review of recent literature.

IF 0.9 Q3 SURGERY
Diksha Deb, Shahzadi Malhotra, Arvind Kr Arya, Ajanya Ak
{"title":"Mind over medicine - Psychological interventions for preoperative anxiety: A review of recent literature.","authors":"Diksha Deb, Shahzadi Malhotra, Arvind Kr Arya, Ajanya Ak","doi":"10.1177/17504589261462315","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Preoperative anxiety is a common distressing phenomenon that negatively affects surgical outcomes and postoperative recovery. This narrative review synthesised evidence on effectiveness of non-pharmacological interventions in managing preoperative anxiety.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>A structured literature search was conducted across PubMed, Hinari Research4Life, Cochrane Library, and Directory of Open Access Journals, focusing on studies evaluating non-pharmacological interventions in surgical patients, published within the last 5 years. Out of 359 total records identified, only 24 studies met inclusion criteria following structured screening process using Scale for the Assessment of Narrative Review Articles guidelines.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The findings suggest that various psychological interventions, including virtual reality, music therapy, mindfulness-based approaches, and cognitive-behavioural techniques, are associated with reductions in preoperative anxiety in several patient populations. These interventions offer non-invasive and potentially accessible means of improving perioperative care in well-resourced settings. However, variability in study design, intervention protocols, and outcome measures limits direct comparison across studies. As a narrative synthesis, the findings should be interpreted with consideration of these methodological differences.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Non-pharmacological interventions, particularly virtual reality and mindfulness, are effective alternatives/adjuncts to pharmacological methods for reducing preoperative anxiety. However, heterogeneity of interventions and outcome measures limits generalisability. Future research should include large-scale randomised controlled trials, standardisation of outcome measures, and culturally adapted studies in different populations.</p>","PeriodicalId":35481,"journal":{"name":"Journal of perioperative practice","volume":" ","pages":"17504589261462315"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of perioperative practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17504589261462315","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Preoperative anxiety is a common distressing phenomenon that negatively affects surgical outcomes and postoperative recovery. This narrative review synthesised evidence on effectiveness of non-pharmacological interventions in managing preoperative anxiety.

Methodology: A structured literature search was conducted across PubMed, Hinari Research4Life, Cochrane Library, and Directory of Open Access Journals, focusing on studies evaluating non-pharmacological interventions in surgical patients, published within the last 5 years. Out of 359 total records identified, only 24 studies met inclusion criteria following structured screening process using Scale for the Assessment of Narrative Review Articles guidelines.

Results: The findings suggest that various psychological interventions, including virtual reality, music therapy, mindfulness-based approaches, and cognitive-behavioural techniques, are associated with reductions in preoperative anxiety in several patient populations. These interventions offer non-invasive and potentially accessible means of improving perioperative care in well-resourced settings. However, variability in study design, intervention protocols, and outcome measures limits direct comparison across studies. As a narrative synthesis, the findings should be interpreted with consideration of these methodological differences.

Conclusion: Non-pharmacological interventions, particularly virtual reality and mindfulness, are effective alternatives/adjuncts to pharmacological methods for reducing preoperative anxiety. However, heterogeneity of interventions and outcome measures limits generalisability. Future research should include large-scale randomised controlled trials, standardisation of outcome measures, and culturally adapted studies in different populations.

心理高于药物——术前焦虑的心理干预:近期文献综述。
前言:术前焦虑是一种常见的痛苦现象,对手术效果和术后恢复产生负面影响。这篇叙述性综述综合了非药物干预治疗术前焦虑有效性的证据。方法:通过PubMed、Hinari Research4Life、Cochrane图书馆和开放获取期刊目录进行结构化文献检索,重点关注最近5年内发表的评估手术患者非药物干预措施的研究。在确定的359项总记录中,只有24项研究符合使用叙述性评论文章评估量表指南的结构化筛选过程的纳入标准。结果:研究结果表明,各种心理干预措施,包括虚拟现实、音乐疗法、基于正念的方法和认知行为技术,与减少一些患者的术前焦虑有关。这些干预措施在资源充足的环境中提供了非侵入性和可能可获得的改善围手术期护理的手段。然而,研究设计、干预方案和结果测量的可变性限制了研究间的直接比较。作为一种叙事综合,研究结果的解释应考虑到这些方法上的差异。结论:非药物干预,特别是虚拟现实和正念,是减少术前焦虑的有效替代/辅助药物方法。然而,干预措施和结果测量的异质性限制了通用性。未来的研究应包括大规模随机对照试验、结果测量的标准化以及不同人群的文化适应性研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of perioperative practice
Journal of perioperative practice Nursing-Medical and Surgical Nursing
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
59
期刊介绍: The Journal of Perioperative Practice (JPP) is the official journal of the Association for Perioperative Practice (AfPP). It is an international, peer reviewed journal with a multidisciplinary ethos across all aspects of perioperative care. The overall aim of the journal is to improve patient safety through informing and developing practice. It is an informative professional journal which provides current evidence-based practice, clinical, management and educational developments for practitioners working in the perioperative environment. The journal promotes perioperative practice by publishing clinical research-based articles, literature reviews, topical discussions, advice on clinical issues, current news items and product information.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书