Natural History of Patients Eligible for PROTEUS Diagnosed with Prostate Cancer and Treated with Radical Prostatectomy Without Perioperative Systemic Treatment

IF 6.3 2区 医学 Q1 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
European urology focus Pub Date : 2026-09-01 Epub Date: 2026-07-09 DOI:10.1016/j.euf.2026.05.002
Benedikt Hoeh, Giovanni Mazzucato, Pierre Tennstedt, Jonas Ekrutt, Felix Preisser, Lars Budäus, Tobias Maurer, Markus Graefen, Derya Tilki, Philipp Mandel, Thomas Steuber
{"title":"Natural History of Patients Eligible for PROTEUS Diagnosed with Prostate Cancer and Treated with Radical Prostatectomy Without Perioperative Systemic Treatment","authors":"Benedikt Hoeh,&nbsp;Giovanni Mazzucato,&nbsp;Pierre Tennstedt,&nbsp;Jonas Ekrutt,&nbsp;Felix Preisser,&nbsp;Lars Budäus,&nbsp;Tobias Maurer,&nbsp;Markus Graefen,&nbsp;Derya Tilki,&nbsp;Philipp Mandel,&nbsp;Thomas Steuber","doi":"10.1016/j.euf.2026.05.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The ongoing PROTEUS study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of perioperative Apalutamide combined with androgen-deprivation therapy in improving oncological outcomes for a specifically defined high-risk prostate cancer (PCa) group who were treated with radical prostatectomy (RP). Interestingly, the PROTEUS inclusion criteria did not rely on established risk categories such as the European Association of Urology (EAU) or the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) high-risk classification. Consequently, little is known about the natural course of patients eligible for PROTEUS who were diagnosed with high-risk PCa and treated with RP without receiving any neoadjuvant systemic treatment. To address this knowledge gap, this analysis included 701 patients eligible for PROTEUS who have undergone RP, revealing that a significant proportion did not fit into the established high-risk classifications (EAU high-risk: 58.2% and NCCN high-risk: 53.1%). Event-free survival (EFS) rates at 36 and 60 mo of the overall cohort of patients eligible for PROTEUS were 57.6% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 53.9–61.7) and 45.9% (95% CI: 41.9–50.4), respectively. Notably, patients solely eligible for PROTEUS criteria exhibited more favorable EFS rates than those who also met EAU and/or NCCN high-risk criteria. This study highlights the need to enhance treatment strategies for patients with high-risk PCa and suggests potential implications for future research based on PROTEUS data. The results aim to inform clinical practices and the understanding the natural history and its outcomes of patients eligible for PROTEUS who were diagnosed with PCa and underwent RP without neoadjuvant systemic treatment.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12160,"journal":{"name":"European urology focus","volume":"12 4","pages":"Pages 695-699"},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European urology focus","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405456926000702","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/7/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The ongoing PROTEUS study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of perioperative Apalutamide combined with androgen-deprivation therapy in improving oncological outcomes for a specifically defined high-risk prostate cancer (PCa) group who were treated with radical prostatectomy (RP). Interestingly, the PROTEUS inclusion criteria did not rely on established risk categories such as the European Association of Urology (EAU) or the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) high-risk classification. Consequently, little is known about the natural course of patients eligible for PROTEUS who were diagnosed with high-risk PCa and treated with RP without receiving any neoadjuvant systemic treatment. To address this knowledge gap, this analysis included 701 patients eligible for PROTEUS who have undergone RP, revealing that a significant proportion did not fit into the established high-risk classifications (EAU high-risk: 58.2% and NCCN high-risk: 53.1%). Event-free survival (EFS) rates at 36 and 60 mo of the overall cohort of patients eligible for PROTEUS were 57.6% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 53.9–61.7) and 45.9% (95% CI: 41.9–50.4), respectively. Notably, patients solely eligible for PROTEUS criteria exhibited more favorable EFS rates than those who also met EAU and/or NCCN high-risk criteria. This study highlights the need to enhance treatment strategies for patients with high-risk PCa and suggests potential implications for future research based on PROTEUS data. The results aim to inform clinical practices and the understanding the natural history and its outcomes of patients eligible for PROTEUS who were diagnosed with PCa and underwent RP without neoadjuvant systemic treatment.
诊断为前列腺癌并接受根治性前列腺切除术而无需围手术期全身治疗的PROTEUS患者的自然病史。
正在进行的PROTEUS研究旨在评估阿帕鲁胺联合雄激素剥夺治疗围手术期对接受根治性前列腺切除术(RP)的高危前列腺癌(PCa)患者改善肿瘤预后的有效性。有趣的是,PROTEUS纳入标准并不依赖于既定的风险类别,如欧洲泌尿外科协会(EAU)或国家综合癌症网络(NCCN)高风险分类。因此,对于被诊断为高危PCa并接受RP治疗但未接受任何新辅助全身治疗的符合PROTEUS的患者的自然病程知之甚少。为了解决这一知识差距,该分析纳入了701例接受过RP的PROTEUS患者,结果显示有很大比例的患者不符合既定的高风险分类(EAU高风险:58.2%,NCCN高风险:53.1%)。在符合PROTEUS治疗条件的患者的总队列中,36个月和60个月的无事件生存率(EFS)分别为57.6%(95%可信区间[CI]: 53.9-61.7)和45.9% (95% CI: 41.9-50.4)。值得注意的是,仅符合PROTEUS标准的患者比同时符合EAU和/或NCCN高风险标准的患者表现出更有利的EFS发生率。该研究强调了加强高风险PCa患者治疗策略的必要性,并提出了基于PROTEUS数据的未来研究的潜在意义。研究结果旨在为临床实践提供信息,了解诊断为PCa并接受RP且未进行新辅助全身治疗的符合PROTEUS的患者的自然病史及其结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
European urology focus
European urology focus Medicine-Urology
CiteScore
10.40
自引率
3.70%
发文量
274
审稿时长
23 days
期刊介绍: European Urology Focus is a new sister journal to European Urology and an official publication of the European Association of Urology (EAU). EU Focus will publish original articles, opinion piece editorials and topical reviews on a wide range of urological issues such as oncology, functional urology, reconstructive urology, laparoscopy, robotic surgery, endourology, female urology, andrology, paediatric urology and sexual medicine. The editorial team welcome basic and translational research articles in the field of urological diseases. Authors may be solicited by the Editor directly. All submitted manuscripts will be peer-reviewed by a panel of experts before being considered for publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书