Optimizing the Priming Process for Hemoadsorption Combined with Hemodialysis: A Two-Stage in vitro and Clinical Validation Study.

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q3 HEMATOLOGY
Lingling Liu, Yanqing Jie, Xiaojing Tang, Suhua Shi, Anna Lorenzin, Zhiguo Mao, Lin Li, Haoran Liu, Xiaoyan Zheng, Xiaohong Xing, Bing Dai, Jing Chen
{"title":"Optimizing the Priming Process for Hemoadsorption Combined with Hemodialysis: A Two-Stage in vitro and Clinical Validation Study.","authors":"Lingling Liu, Yanqing Jie, Xiaojing Tang, Suhua Shi, Anna Lorenzin, Zhiguo Mao, Lin Li, Haoran Liu, Xiaoyan Zheng, Xiaohong Xing, Bing Dai, Jing Chen","doi":"10.1159/000553476","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Conventional priming for hemoadsorption combined with hemodialysis is complex, time-consuming, and resource-intensive. We aimed to develop and validate a standardized, efficient, and safe tandem priming protocol by systematically evaluating its operational efficiency, circuit cleanliness, clinical efficacy, and clinical safety.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A two-stage \"in vitro screening - clinical validation\" design was utilized, using the HA130 hemoadsorption cartridge (Jafron, China) throughout all experiments and clinical sessions. The in vitro phase compared four novel tandem priming methods (varying slow-prime flow rates and fast-flush volumes) against a traditional separate-priming method to identify an optimal protocol based on efficiency and cleanliness. This protocol was then validated in a single-center, single-blind randomized controlled trial involving 53 maintenance hemodialysis patients randomized to the optimized tandem method (n = 29) or the traditional method (n = 24). The primary safety outcome was circuit clotting; the primary efficacy outcome was solute clearance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In vitro, all tandem methods were significantly faster (26.05-34.89 min vs. 55.40 min, p < 0.001) and consumed fewer resources while meeting all cleanliness standards. After preliminary safety screening excluded a faster flow rate (100 mL/min), the 50-mL/min slow-prime with 2,000-mL fast-flush protocol was selected. In the clinical trial, the incidence of grade I cartridge clotting was low and statistically comparable between the tandem (3.45%) and traditional (4.17%) groups (p > 0.05). Solute reduction values for urea, creatinine, and β<sub>2</sub>-microglobulin were not significantly different, demonstrating comparable therapeutic efficacy.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The novel tandem priming protocol is a highly efficient, resource-sparing, and safe alternative to traditional methods. It maintains therapeutic efficacy and circuit patency, offering a valuable, standardized solution for clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":8953,"journal":{"name":"Blood Purification","volume":" ","pages":"1-12"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Blood Purification","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000553476","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Conventional priming for hemoadsorption combined with hemodialysis is complex, time-consuming, and resource-intensive. We aimed to develop and validate a standardized, efficient, and safe tandem priming protocol by systematically evaluating its operational efficiency, circuit cleanliness, clinical efficacy, and clinical safety.

Methods: A two-stage "in vitro screening - clinical validation" design was utilized, using the HA130 hemoadsorption cartridge (Jafron, China) throughout all experiments and clinical sessions. The in vitro phase compared four novel tandem priming methods (varying slow-prime flow rates and fast-flush volumes) against a traditional separate-priming method to identify an optimal protocol based on efficiency and cleanliness. This protocol was then validated in a single-center, single-blind randomized controlled trial involving 53 maintenance hemodialysis patients randomized to the optimized tandem method (n = 29) or the traditional method (n = 24). The primary safety outcome was circuit clotting; the primary efficacy outcome was solute clearance.

Results: In vitro, all tandem methods were significantly faster (26.05-34.89 min vs. 55.40 min, p < 0.001) and consumed fewer resources while meeting all cleanliness standards. After preliminary safety screening excluded a faster flow rate (100 mL/min), the 50-mL/min slow-prime with 2,000-mL fast-flush protocol was selected. In the clinical trial, the incidence of grade I cartridge clotting was low and statistically comparable between the tandem (3.45%) and traditional (4.17%) groups (p > 0.05). Solute reduction values for urea, creatinine, and β2-microglobulin were not significantly different, demonstrating comparable therapeutic efficacy.

Conclusion: The novel tandem priming protocol is a highly efficient, resource-sparing, and safe alternative to traditional methods. It maintains therapeutic efficacy and circuit patency, offering a valuable, standardized solution for clinical practice.

优化血液吸附联合血液透析(HAHD)的启动过程:一项两阶段体外和临床验证研究。
简介:传统的血液吸附联合血液透析(HAHD)启动是复杂、耗时和资源密集的。我们旨在通过系统评估其操作效率、电路清洁度、临床疗效和临床安全性,开发和验证一种标准化、高效和安全的串联启动方案。方法:采用“体外筛选-临床验证”两阶段设计,在所有实验和临床阶段均使用HA130血液吸附盒(Jafron,中国)。体外阶段将四种新型串联启动方法(不同的慢启动流速和快速冲洗量)与传统的分离启动方法进行比较,以确定基于效率和清洁度的最佳方案。然后在一项单中心、单盲随机对照试验中对该方案进行验证,该试验涉及53名维持性血液透析患者,随机分为优化串联方法(n = 29)和传统方法(n = 24)。主要的安全性指标是血流凝血;主要疗效指标是绝对清除率。结果:在体外,两种串联法在满足所有洁净度标准的情况下,均显著提高了检测速度(26.05 ~ 34.89 min vs. 55.40 min, P < 0.001),消耗的资源更少。经过初步的安全性筛选,排除了更快的流速(100 mL/min),选择了50 mL/min慢速启动和2000 mL快速冲洗方案。在临床试验中,串联组(3.45%)与传统组(4.17%)一级血凝发生率较低,具有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。尿素、肌酐和β2微球蛋白的溶质还原值无显著差异,显示出相当的治疗效果。结论:新型串联启动方案是一种高效、节约资源、安全的传统方法替代方案。它保持了治疗效果和电路通畅,为临床实践提供了有价值的、标准化的解决方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Blood Purification
Blood Purification 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
3.30%
发文量
69
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Practical information on hemodialysis, hemofiltration, peritoneal dialysis and apheresis is featured in this journal. Recognizing the critical importance of equipment and procedures, particular emphasis has been placed on reports, drawn from a wide range of fields, describing technical advances and improvements in methodology. Papers reflect the search for cost-effective solutions which increase not only patient survival but also patient comfort and disease improvement through prevention or correction of undesirable effects. Advances in vascular access and blood anticoagulation, problems associated with exposure of blood to foreign surfaces and acute-care nephrology, including continuous therapies, also receive attention. Nephrologists, internists, intensivists and hospital staff involved in dialysis, apheresis and immunoadsorption for acute and chronic solid organ failure will find this journal useful and informative. ''Blood Purification'' also serves as a platform for multidisciplinary experiences involving nephrologists, cardiologists and critical care physicians in order to expand the level of interaction between different disciplines and specialities.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书