{"title":"Optimizing the Priming Process for Hemoadsorption Combined with Hemodialysis: A Two-Stage in vitro and Clinical Validation Study.","authors":"Lingling Liu, Yanqing Jie, Xiaojing Tang, Suhua Shi, Anna Lorenzin, Zhiguo Mao, Lin Li, Haoran Liu, Xiaoyan Zheng, Xiaohong Xing, Bing Dai, Jing Chen","doi":"10.1159/000553476","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Conventional priming for hemoadsorption combined with hemodialysis is complex, time-consuming, and resource-intensive. We aimed to develop and validate a standardized, efficient, and safe tandem priming protocol by systematically evaluating its operational efficiency, circuit cleanliness, clinical efficacy, and clinical safety.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A two-stage \"in vitro screening - clinical validation\" design was utilized, using the HA130 hemoadsorption cartridge (Jafron, China) throughout all experiments and clinical sessions. The in vitro phase compared four novel tandem priming methods (varying slow-prime flow rates and fast-flush volumes) against a traditional separate-priming method to identify an optimal protocol based on efficiency and cleanliness. This protocol was then validated in a single-center, single-blind randomized controlled trial involving 53 maintenance hemodialysis patients randomized to the optimized tandem method (n = 29) or the traditional method (n = 24). The primary safety outcome was circuit clotting; the primary efficacy outcome was solute clearance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In vitro, all tandem methods were significantly faster (26.05-34.89 min vs. 55.40 min, p < 0.001) and consumed fewer resources while meeting all cleanliness standards. After preliminary safety screening excluded a faster flow rate (100 mL/min), the 50-mL/min slow-prime with 2,000-mL fast-flush protocol was selected. In the clinical trial, the incidence of grade I cartridge clotting was low and statistically comparable between the tandem (3.45%) and traditional (4.17%) groups (p > 0.05). Solute reduction values for urea, creatinine, and β<sub>2</sub>-microglobulin were not significantly different, demonstrating comparable therapeutic efficacy.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The novel tandem priming protocol is a highly efficient, resource-sparing, and safe alternative to traditional methods. It maintains therapeutic efficacy and circuit patency, offering a valuable, standardized solution for clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":8953,"journal":{"name":"Blood Purification","volume":" ","pages":"1-12"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Blood Purification","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000553476","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: Conventional priming for hemoadsorption combined with hemodialysis is complex, time-consuming, and resource-intensive. We aimed to develop and validate a standardized, efficient, and safe tandem priming protocol by systematically evaluating its operational efficiency, circuit cleanliness, clinical efficacy, and clinical safety.
Methods: A two-stage "in vitro screening - clinical validation" design was utilized, using the HA130 hemoadsorption cartridge (Jafron, China) throughout all experiments and clinical sessions. The in vitro phase compared four novel tandem priming methods (varying slow-prime flow rates and fast-flush volumes) against a traditional separate-priming method to identify an optimal protocol based on efficiency and cleanliness. This protocol was then validated in a single-center, single-blind randomized controlled trial involving 53 maintenance hemodialysis patients randomized to the optimized tandem method (n = 29) or the traditional method (n = 24). The primary safety outcome was circuit clotting; the primary efficacy outcome was solute clearance.
Results: In vitro, all tandem methods were significantly faster (26.05-34.89 min vs. 55.40 min, p < 0.001) and consumed fewer resources while meeting all cleanliness standards. After preliminary safety screening excluded a faster flow rate (100 mL/min), the 50-mL/min slow-prime with 2,000-mL fast-flush protocol was selected. In the clinical trial, the incidence of grade I cartridge clotting was low and statistically comparable between the tandem (3.45%) and traditional (4.17%) groups (p > 0.05). Solute reduction values for urea, creatinine, and β2-microglobulin were not significantly different, demonstrating comparable therapeutic efficacy.
Conclusion: The novel tandem priming protocol is a highly efficient, resource-sparing, and safe alternative to traditional methods. It maintains therapeutic efficacy and circuit patency, offering a valuable, standardized solution for clinical practice.
期刊介绍:
Practical information on hemodialysis, hemofiltration, peritoneal dialysis and apheresis is featured in this journal. Recognizing the critical importance of equipment and procedures, particular emphasis has been placed on reports, drawn from a wide range of fields, describing technical advances and improvements in methodology. Papers reflect the search for cost-effective solutions which increase not only patient survival but also patient comfort and disease improvement through prevention or correction of undesirable effects. Advances in vascular access and blood anticoagulation, problems associated with exposure of blood to foreign surfaces and acute-care nephrology, including continuous therapies, also receive attention. Nephrologists, internists, intensivists and hospital staff involved in dialysis, apheresis and immunoadsorption for acute and chronic solid organ failure will find this journal useful and informative. ''Blood Purification'' also serves as a platform for multidisciplinary experiences involving nephrologists, cardiologists and critical care physicians in order to expand the level of interaction between different disciplines and specialities.