Aspirin for cancer prevention in individuals with Lynch syndrome: first results from the CaPP3 multicentre, randomised, double-blind, non-inferiority trial.

IF 39.1 1区 医学 Q1 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
John Burn,Gillian M Borthwick,Faye Elliott,Finlay Macrae,Kai Ren Ong,Alison C Kraus,Nadir Arber,Jukka-Pekka Mecklin,Angel Alonso,Emma R Woodward,D Gareth Evans,Alex Murray,Katie Snape,Ruth E Cleaver,Adam Shaw,Huw J W Thomas,Ajith V Kumar,Dorothy Halliday,Lucy E Side,Rachel E Harrison,Rosemarie Davidson,Ruth Armstrong,Jackie Cook,Rachel Hart,Patrick J Morrison,Julian G Barwell,Alan Donaldson,Zoe Kemp,Jennie Murray,Zosia Miedzybrodzka,Caroline Pottinger,Jonathan Berg,Richard Gallon,D Timothy Bishop,
{"title":"Aspirin for cancer prevention in individuals with Lynch syndrome: first results from the CaPP3 multicentre, randomised, double-blind, non-inferiority trial.","authors":"John Burn,Gillian M Borthwick,Faye Elliott,Finlay Macrae,Kai Ren Ong,Alison C Kraus,Nadir Arber,Jukka-Pekka Mecklin,Angel Alonso,Emma R Woodward,D Gareth Evans,Alex Murray,Katie Snape,Ruth E Cleaver,Adam Shaw,Huw J W Thomas,Ajith V Kumar,Dorothy Halliday,Lucy E Side,Rachel E Harrison,Rosemarie Davidson,Ruth Armstrong,Jackie Cook,Rachel Hart,Patrick J Morrison,Julian G Barwell,Alan Donaldson,Zoe Kemp,Jennie Murray,Zosia Miedzybrodzka,Caroline Pottinger,Jonathan Berg,Richard Gallon,D Timothy Bishop, ","doi":"10.1016/s2468-1253(26)00114-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\r\nIn CAPP2, 600 mg aspirin daily significantly reduced the incidence of colorectal cancer and the incidence of all Lynch syndrome cancers among participants with Lynch syndrome. CaPP3 aimed to assess the efficacy of two lower doses of aspirin.\r\n\r\nMETHODS\r\nCaPP3 was a multicentre, parallel-group, randomised, double-blind, dose non-inferiority trial that compared 100 mg or 300 mg daily aspirin with 600 mg daily aspirin in Lynch syndrome carriers aged older than 18 years; patients were recruited from clinical genetics centres in the UK, Australia, Finland, Israel, and Spain. The trial was double-blinded for 2 years, and open label on the same dose for three subsequent years with consent for cancer follow-up (except in the UK, where 75 mg aspirin replaced the 100 mg dose in the open phase). Participants from the five countries were randomly assigned by the Newcastle Clinical Trials Unit in a 3:3:4 ratio to receive daily doses of 100 mg, 300 mg, and 600 mg. Participants received blinded doses of aspirin, identically packaged so as not to indicate dose, every 6 months. Information on compliance was collected on a self-report basis. The dose was revealed at 2 years of recruitment; subsequently, aspirin was obtained via hospital prescriptions during this open-label phase. The primary outcome was the number of new primary mismatch repair-deficient cancers (referred to as Lynch syndrome cancers) developing in participants and diagnosed in the period from the start of the intervention for each participant. The safety outcome was the number of adverse events of interest in the first 2 years of blinded treatment. Aspirin-specific adverse events were recorded at regular participant interviews as a measure of harm during the blinded phase. A non-inferiority margin of 1·5 was chosen for each lower dose against 600 mg daily for the primary endpoint. The effects of the two lower doses (compared to 600 mg daily) were examined with Cox proportional hazards examining time to first Lynch syndrome cancer, with the effect being assessed by hazard ratios (HRs), while negative binomial regression examined the relative cancer burden assessed by incidence rate ratios (IRRs). Non-inferiority was proposed with either lower dose if the upper 95% CI of both the HR and IRR in comparison with 600 mg were below the non-inferiority boundary of 1·5. Participants were deemed per protocol if they had adhered to the protocol and continued taking aspirin into the unblinded phase (ie, they agreed to remain in the study at the 2-year review); non-inferiority required consistency of effects within both intention-to-treat and per-protocol populations and for both HR and IRR analyses. CaPP3 is registered on the ISRCTN registry (ISRCTN16261285) and ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02497820), and was closed to recruitment in March 2019; this analysis was timed for when all participants reached 5 years past recruitment. Further follow-up is planned until all participants reach 10 years past recruitment.\r\n\r\nFINDINGS\r\nBetween October, 2014, and March, 2019, 1879 patients with Lynch syndrome were recruited and randomly assigned: 564 (30·0%) to 100 mg aspirin daily, 565 (30·1%) to 300 mg daily, and 750 (39·9%) to 600 mg daily. Following the exclusion of 13 participants, the intention-to-treat population consisted of 1866 participants; 559 (30·0%) received 100 mg, 562 (30·1%) received 300 mg, and 745 (39·9%) received 600 mg. 730 (39·1%) of 1866 participants stopped taking aspirin within the 2-year blinded phase, while 937 (50·2%) completed 5 years of aspirin, taking aspirin during the subsequent 3-year unblinded open phase. The per-protocol population consisted of 1136 participants: 336 (29·6%) on 100 mg, 357 (31·4%) on 300 mg, and 443 (39·0%) on 600 mg. Up to a median of 66·4 months (IQR 32·1-84·0) of follow-up, 176 participants had been diagnosed with 216 Lynch syndrome cancers (57 cancers in patients on 100 mg, 75 in those on 300 mg, and 84 in those on 600 mg), including 83 of 1846 participants with colorectal cancer (21 participants on 100 mg, 30 on 300 mg, and 32 on 600 mg). For Lynch syndrome cancers, the 100 mg dose was non-inferior to 600 mg in the intention-to-treat analysis (HR for time to first Lynch syndrome cancer 0·97 [95% CI 0·67-1·42], IRR for cancer burden 0·94 [95% CI 0·65-1·38]). For the per-protocol analysis, the cancer burden was non-inferior with the 100 mg dose (IRR 0·90 [95% CI 0·55-1·46]) but time to first Lynch syndrome cancer was not (HR 1·00 [95% CI 0·61-1·63]). Non-inferiority was not established for the 300 mg dose for either time to first Lynch syndrome cancer or cancer burden, in both intention-to-treat and per-protocol analyses (intention-to-treat population: HR 1·28 [95% CI 0·91-1·80], IRR 1·12 [95% CI 0·79-1·61]; per-protocol population: HR 1·42 [0·91-2·19], IRR 1·28 [0·82-1·98]). The proportion of participants with any reported adverse events of interest increased modestly but significantly with dose: 140 (25·0%) of 561 participants on 100 mg, 151 (26·8%) of 564 on 300 mg, and 234 (31·2%) of 750 on 600 mg (p=0·03 for heterogeneity). Over the 5 years, serious adverse events due to bleeding occurred in no patients on 100 mg, three (0·5%) on 300 mg, and 11 (1·5%) participants on 600 mg (p=0·004 for heterogeneity).\r\n\r\nINTERPRETATION\r\nAlthough non-inferiority could not formally be concluded for either 100 mg or 300 mg of aspirin daily by comparison with 600 mg aspirin daily, there was evidence that the 100 mg dose had similar characteristics to 600 mg in terms of cancer risk but with fewer side-effects and less risk of bleeding.\r\n\r\nFUNDING\r\nCancer Research UK; Bayer Pharma; Newcastle Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust.","PeriodicalId":56028,"journal":{"name":"Lancet Gastroenterology & Hepatology","volume":"18 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":39.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lancet Gastroenterology & Hepatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/s2468-1253(26)00114-7","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BACKGROUND In CAPP2, 600 mg aspirin daily significantly reduced the incidence of colorectal cancer and the incidence of all Lynch syndrome cancers among participants with Lynch syndrome. CaPP3 aimed to assess the efficacy of two lower doses of aspirin. METHODS CaPP3 was a multicentre, parallel-group, randomised, double-blind, dose non-inferiority trial that compared 100 mg or 300 mg daily aspirin with 600 mg daily aspirin in Lynch syndrome carriers aged older than 18 years; patients were recruited from clinical genetics centres in the UK, Australia, Finland, Israel, and Spain. The trial was double-blinded for 2 years, and open label on the same dose for three subsequent years with consent for cancer follow-up (except in the UK, where 75 mg aspirin replaced the 100 mg dose in the open phase). Participants from the five countries were randomly assigned by the Newcastle Clinical Trials Unit in a 3:3:4 ratio to receive daily doses of 100 mg, 300 mg, and 600 mg. Participants received blinded doses of aspirin, identically packaged so as not to indicate dose, every 6 months. Information on compliance was collected on a self-report basis. The dose was revealed at 2 years of recruitment; subsequently, aspirin was obtained via hospital prescriptions during this open-label phase. The primary outcome was the number of new primary mismatch repair-deficient cancers (referred to as Lynch syndrome cancers) developing in participants and diagnosed in the period from the start of the intervention for each participant. The safety outcome was the number of adverse events of interest in the first 2 years of blinded treatment. Aspirin-specific adverse events were recorded at regular participant interviews as a measure of harm during the blinded phase. A non-inferiority margin of 1·5 was chosen for each lower dose against 600 mg daily for the primary endpoint. The effects of the two lower doses (compared to 600 mg daily) were examined with Cox proportional hazards examining time to first Lynch syndrome cancer, with the effect being assessed by hazard ratios (HRs), while negative binomial regression examined the relative cancer burden assessed by incidence rate ratios (IRRs). Non-inferiority was proposed with either lower dose if the upper 95% CI of both the HR and IRR in comparison with 600 mg were below the non-inferiority boundary of 1·5. Participants were deemed per protocol if they had adhered to the protocol and continued taking aspirin into the unblinded phase (ie, they agreed to remain in the study at the 2-year review); non-inferiority required consistency of effects within both intention-to-treat and per-protocol populations and for both HR and IRR analyses. CaPP3 is registered on the ISRCTN registry (ISRCTN16261285) and ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02497820), and was closed to recruitment in March 2019; this analysis was timed for when all participants reached 5 years past recruitment. Further follow-up is planned until all participants reach 10 years past recruitment. FINDINGS Between October, 2014, and March, 2019, 1879 patients with Lynch syndrome were recruited and randomly assigned: 564 (30·0%) to 100 mg aspirin daily, 565 (30·1%) to 300 mg daily, and 750 (39·9%) to 600 mg daily. Following the exclusion of 13 participants, the intention-to-treat population consisted of 1866 participants; 559 (30·0%) received 100 mg, 562 (30·1%) received 300 mg, and 745 (39·9%) received 600 mg. 730 (39·1%) of 1866 participants stopped taking aspirin within the 2-year blinded phase, while 937 (50·2%) completed 5 years of aspirin, taking aspirin during the subsequent 3-year unblinded open phase. The per-protocol population consisted of 1136 participants: 336 (29·6%) on 100 mg, 357 (31·4%) on 300 mg, and 443 (39·0%) on 600 mg. Up to a median of 66·4 months (IQR 32·1-84·0) of follow-up, 176 participants had been diagnosed with 216 Lynch syndrome cancers (57 cancers in patients on 100 mg, 75 in those on 300 mg, and 84 in those on 600 mg), including 83 of 1846 participants with colorectal cancer (21 participants on 100 mg, 30 on 300 mg, and 32 on 600 mg). For Lynch syndrome cancers, the 100 mg dose was non-inferior to 600 mg in the intention-to-treat analysis (HR for time to first Lynch syndrome cancer 0·97 [95% CI 0·67-1·42], IRR for cancer burden 0·94 [95% CI 0·65-1·38]). For the per-protocol analysis, the cancer burden was non-inferior with the 100 mg dose (IRR 0·90 [95% CI 0·55-1·46]) but time to first Lynch syndrome cancer was not (HR 1·00 [95% CI 0·61-1·63]). Non-inferiority was not established for the 300 mg dose for either time to first Lynch syndrome cancer or cancer burden, in both intention-to-treat and per-protocol analyses (intention-to-treat population: HR 1·28 [95% CI 0·91-1·80], IRR 1·12 [95% CI 0·79-1·61]; per-protocol population: HR 1·42 [0·91-2·19], IRR 1·28 [0·82-1·98]). The proportion of participants with any reported adverse events of interest increased modestly but significantly with dose: 140 (25·0%) of 561 participants on 100 mg, 151 (26·8%) of 564 on 300 mg, and 234 (31·2%) of 750 on 600 mg (p=0·03 for heterogeneity). Over the 5 years, serious adverse events due to bleeding occurred in no patients on 100 mg, three (0·5%) on 300 mg, and 11 (1·5%) participants on 600 mg (p=0·004 for heterogeneity). INTERPRETATION Although non-inferiority could not formally be concluded for either 100 mg or 300 mg of aspirin daily by comparison with 600 mg aspirin daily, there was evidence that the 100 mg dose had similar characteristics to 600 mg in terms of cancer risk but with fewer side-effects and less risk of bleeding. FUNDING Cancer Research UK; Bayer Pharma; Newcastle Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust.
阿司匹林对Lynch综合征患者的癌症预防作用:CaPP3多中心、随机、双盲、非劣效性试验的初步结果
在CAPP2中,每天600毫克阿司匹林显著降低了Lynch综合征参与者中结直肠癌和所有Lynch综合征癌症的发病率。CaPP3旨在评估两种低剂量阿司匹林的疗效。方法scapp3是一项多中心、平行组、随机、双盲、剂量非效性试验,比较18岁以上Lynch综合征携带者每日服用阿司匹林100 mg或300 mg与每日服用阿司匹林600 mg;患者从英国、澳大利亚、芬兰、以色列和西班牙的临床遗传学中心招募。该试验采用双盲法,为期2年,并在同意癌症随访的情况下,在随后的3年中使用相同剂量的开放标签(英国除外,在开放阶段,75毫克阿司匹林取代了100毫克剂量)。来自五个国家的参与者由纽卡斯尔临床试验小组按3:3:4的比例随机分配,接受每日100mg, 300mg和600mg的剂量。参与者每6个月接受盲法剂量的阿司匹林,包装相同,不显示剂量。关于遵守情况的资料是在自我报告的基础上收集的。剂量在招募2年时显示;随后,在这一开放标签阶段,通过医院处方获得阿司匹林。主要结果是参与者中发生的新的原发性错配修复缺陷癌症(称为Lynch综合征癌症)的数量,并在每个参与者的干预开始期间被诊断出来。安全性结果是在盲法治疗的前2年中关注的不良事件数量。在盲法研究阶段,在参与者的定期访谈中记录阿司匹林特异性不良事件,作为危害的衡量标准。对于主要终点每日600mg,每降低一个剂量,选择的非劣效性裕度为1.5。两种较低剂量(与每天600毫克相比)的影响采用Cox比例风险检查首次Lynch综合征癌症的时间,并通过风险比(hr)评估其影响,而负二项回归通过发病率比(IRRs)评估相对癌症负担。如果与600 mg相比,HR和IRR的上95% CI均低于1.5的非劣效性界限,则建议使用较低剂量。如果参与者遵守了方案并在非盲法阶段继续服用阿司匹林(即,他们同意在2年的审查中继续参与研究),则认为他们符合方案;非劣效性要求在意向治疗人群和方案人群以及HR和IRR分析中效果的一致性。CaPP3已在ISRCTN注册中心(ISRCTN16261285)和ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02497820)注册,并于2019年3月结束招募;这项分析是在所有参与者被招募5年后进行的。计划进一步随访,直到所有参与者在招募后满10年。在2014年10月至2019年3月期间,招募了1879名Lynch综合征患者并随机分配:564名(30.0%)至每天100mg阿司匹林,565名(30.1%)至每天300mg阿司匹林,750名(39.9%)至每天600mg阿司匹林。在排除13名受试者后,意向治疗人群包括1866名受试者;559人(30.0%)服用了100毫克,562人(30.1%)服用了300毫克,745人(39.9%)服用了600毫克。1866名参与者中,有730人(39.1%)在2年的盲法阶段停止服用阿司匹林,937人(50.2%)完成了5年的阿司匹林,在随后的3年非盲法开放阶段服用阿司匹林。每个方案的人群由1136名参与者组成:336名(29.6%)服用100mg, 357名(31.4%)服用300mg, 443名(39.0%)服用600mg。随访中位数为66.4个月(IQR 32.1 - 80.4), 176名参与者被诊断为216例Lynch综合征癌症(服用100mg的患者中有57例,服用300mg的患者中有75例,服用600mg的患者中有84例),其中1846名参与者中有83名患有结直肠癌(服用100mg的患者中有21人,服用300mg的患者中有30人,服用600mg的患者中有32人)。对于Lynch综合征癌症,在意向治疗分析中,100 mg剂量不低于600 mg(首次Lynch综合征癌症发生时间的HR为0.97 [95% CI 0.67 - 1.42],癌症负担的IRR为0.94 [95% CI 0.65 - 1.38])。对于按方案分析,100 mg剂量的癌症负担并不低(IRR为0.90 [95% CI为0.55 - 1.46]),但发生首次Lynch综合征癌症的时间却不低(HR为1.00 [95% CI为0.61 - 1.63])。在意向治疗和方案分析中,300 mg剂量对首次Lynch综合征癌症或癌症负担的时间均未建立非劣效性(意向治疗人群:HR 1.28 [95% CI 0.91 -1·80],IRR 1.12 [95% CI 0.79 - 1.61];方案人群:HR 1.42[0.91 -2·19],IRR 1.28[0.82 -1·98])。 有任何不良事件报告的受试者比例随着剂量的增加而适度增加,但显著增加:561名受试者中有140名(25.0%)服用100mg, 564名受试者中有151名(26.8%)服用300mg, 750名受试者中有234名(31.2%)服用600mg(异质性p= 0.03)。5年内,100mg组无患者发生严重出血不良事件,300mg组3例(0.5%),600mg组11例(1.5%)(异质性p= 0.004)。解释:虽然每日100mg或300mg阿司匹林与每日600mg阿司匹林的非劣效性不能正式得出结论,但有证据表明,100mg剂量与600mg剂量在癌症风险方面具有相似的特征,但副作用和出血风险更少。英国癌症研究基金会;拜耳制药公司;纽卡斯尔医院NHS基金会信托。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
50.30
自引率
1.10%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The Lancet Gastroenterology & Hepatology is an authoritative forum for key opinion leaders across medicine, government, and health systems to influence clinical practice, explore global policy, and inform constructive, positive change worldwide. The Lancet Gastroenterology & Hepatology publishes papers that reflect the rich variety of ongoing clinical research in these fields, especially in the areas of inflammatory bowel diseases, NAFLD and NASH, functional gastrointestinal disorders, digestive cancers, and viral hepatitis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书