A Soil Bulk Density Metric to Improve Rapid Assessment of Wetland Condition.

IF 2.4 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ECOLOGY
Wetlands Pub Date : 2026-01-01 Epub Date: 2026-07-07 DOI:10.1007/s13157-026-02044-9
Katie Hossler, James Tyler Retherford, Mitchell Link
{"title":"A Soil Bulk Density Metric to Improve Rapid Assessment of Wetland Condition.","authors":"Katie Hossler, James Tyler Retherford, Mitchell Link","doi":"10.1007/s13157-026-02044-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Rapid wetland assessments are designed to require minimal field effort (e.g. half-day site visit), but still provide critical information on wetland ecological condition and functioning. Many wetland functions occur within or are supported by the soil, yet soil condition is seldom-or only minimally-included in most state rapid assessments. We focus on the Ohio Rapid Assessment Method for wetlands (ORAM) and evaluate soil bulk density as an indicator of wetland soil condition that can be incorporated into rapid wetland assessments. Soil bulk density ([Formula: see text]) is relatively easy to measure and requires only basic instrumentation. It also correlates well with more intensive metrics of soil condition (e.g. carbon content, aggregation). We sampled 45 wetlands in west-central Ohio, that exhibited a range of wetland type and ecological condition. From each wetland, we collected five soil cores (to 15-cm depth) and then analyzed the soil samples for [Formula: see text], carbon content, and water-stable aggregates. These three measurements were used to develop a four-bin [Formula: see text] metric of soil condition. Incorporating this metric into the current ORAM improved relationships with [Formula: see text] (<i>r</i> = 0.48 to <i>r</i> = 0.58) and soil condition (<i>r</i> = -0.53 to <i>r</i> = -0.64). Additional gains could be achieved with higher weighting of the [Formula: see text] metric. Alternatively, the current scoring system could be left intact, but protection of wetlands with high quality soils ensured by providing special status when [Formula: see text] is less than 0.40 g cm[Formula: see text] (highest quality) or less than 0.73 g cm[Formula: see text] (high quality).</p><p><strong>Supplementary information: </strong>The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s13157-026-02044-9.</p>","PeriodicalId":23640,"journal":{"name":"Wetlands","volume":"46 6","pages":"79"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13341704/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Wetlands","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13157-026-02044-9","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/7/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Rapid wetland assessments are designed to require minimal field effort (e.g. half-day site visit), but still provide critical information on wetland ecological condition and functioning. Many wetland functions occur within or are supported by the soil, yet soil condition is seldom-or only minimally-included in most state rapid assessments. We focus on the Ohio Rapid Assessment Method for wetlands (ORAM) and evaluate soil bulk density as an indicator of wetland soil condition that can be incorporated into rapid wetland assessments. Soil bulk density ([Formula: see text]) is relatively easy to measure and requires only basic instrumentation. It also correlates well with more intensive metrics of soil condition (e.g. carbon content, aggregation). We sampled 45 wetlands in west-central Ohio, that exhibited a range of wetland type and ecological condition. From each wetland, we collected five soil cores (to 15-cm depth) and then analyzed the soil samples for [Formula: see text], carbon content, and water-stable aggregates. These three measurements were used to develop a four-bin [Formula: see text] metric of soil condition. Incorporating this metric into the current ORAM improved relationships with [Formula: see text] (r = 0.48 to r = 0.58) and soil condition (r = -0.53 to r = -0.64). Additional gains could be achieved with higher weighting of the [Formula: see text] metric. Alternatively, the current scoring system could be left intact, but protection of wetlands with high quality soils ensured by providing special status when [Formula: see text] is less than 0.40 g cm[Formula: see text] (highest quality) or less than 0.73 g cm[Formula: see text] (high quality).

Supplementary information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s13157-026-02044-9.

土壤容重法改进湿地状况快速评价。
快速湿地评估的目的是需要最少的实地工作(例如半天的实地考察),但仍然提供湿地生态状况和功能的关键信息。许多湿地功能发生在土壤中或由土壤支持,但土壤状况很少或仅最低限度地包括在大多数州的快速评估中。本文以俄亥俄州湿地快速评价方法(ORAM)为研究对象,对土壤容重作为湿地土壤状况的指标进行评价,并将其纳入湿地快速评价。土壤容重([公式:见文本])相对容易测量,只需要基本的仪器。它还与土壤条件的更密集的指标(如碳含量,聚集)密切相关。我们在俄亥俄州中西部选取了45个湿地,这些湿地表现出一系列的湿地类型和生态状况。从每个湿地中,我们收集了5个土壤芯(深度为15厘米),然后分析土壤样品的[公式:见文本]、碳含量和水稳性团聚体。这三种测量方法被用来建立一个四箱土壤状况度量标准[公式:见文本]。将这一指标整合到当前的ORAM中,改善了与[公式:见文本](r = 0.48至r = 0.58)和土壤条件(r = -0.53至r = -0.64)的关系。额外的收益可以通过提高[公式:见文本]度量的权重来实现。或者,可以保留现有的评分系统,但当[公式:见文]小于0.40 g cm[公式:见文](最高质量)或小于0.73 g cm[公式:见文](高质量)时,通过提供特殊地位来保证对高质量土壤湿地的保护。补充资料:在线版本包含补充资料,下载地址:10.1007/s13157-026-02044-9。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Wetlands
Wetlands 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
10.00%
发文量
108
审稿时长
4.0 months
期刊介绍: Wetlands is an international journal concerned with all aspects of wetlands biology, ecology, hydrology, water chemistry, soil and sediment characteristics, management, and laws and regulations. The journal is published 6 times per year, with the goal of centralizing the publication of pioneering wetlands work that has otherwise been spread among a myriad of journals. Since wetlands research usually requires an interdisciplinary approach, the journal in not limited to specific disciplines but seeks manuscripts reporting research results from all relevant disciplines. Manuscripts focusing on management topics and regulatory considerations relevant to wetlands are also suitable. Submissions may be in the form of articles or short notes. Timely review articles will also be considered, but the subject and content should be discussed with the Editor-in-Chief (NDSU.wetlands.editor@ndsu.edu) prior to submission. All papers published in Wetlands are reviewed by two qualified peers, an Associate Editor, and the Editor-in-Chief prior to acceptance and publication. All papers must present new information, must be factual and original, and must not have been published elsewhere.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书