Katie Hossler, James Tyler Retherford, Mitchell Link
{"title":"A Soil Bulk Density Metric to Improve Rapid Assessment of Wetland Condition.","authors":"Katie Hossler, James Tyler Retherford, Mitchell Link","doi":"10.1007/s13157-026-02044-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Rapid wetland assessments are designed to require minimal field effort (e.g. half-day site visit), but still provide critical information on wetland ecological condition and functioning. Many wetland functions occur within or are supported by the soil, yet soil condition is seldom-or only minimally-included in most state rapid assessments. We focus on the Ohio Rapid Assessment Method for wetlands (ORAM) and evaluate soil bulk density as an indicator of wetland soil condition that can be incorporated into rapid wetland assessments. Soil bulk density ([Formula: see text]) is relatively easy to measure and requires only basic instrumentation. It also correlates well with more intensive metrics of soil condition (e.g. carbon content, aggregation). We sampled 45 wetlands in west-central Ohio, that exhibited a range of wetland type and ecological condition. From each wetland, we collected five soil cores (to 15-cm depth) and then analyzed the soil samples for [Formula: see text], carbon content, and water-stable aggregates. These three measurements were used to develop a four-bin [Formula: see text] metric of soil condition. Incorporating this metric into the current ORAM improved relationships with [Formula: see text] (<i>r</i> = 0.48 to <i>r</i> = 0.58) and soil condition (<i>r</i> = -0.53 to <i>r</i> = -0.64). Additional gains could be achieved with higher weighting of the [Formula: see text] metric. Alternatively, the current scoring system could be left intact, but protection of wetlands with high quality soils ensured by providing special status when [Formula: see text] is less than 0.40 g cm[Formula: see text] (highest quality) or less than 0.73 g cm[Formula: see text] (high quality).</p><p><strong>Supplementary information: </strong>The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s13157-026-02044-9.</p>","PeriodicalId":23640,"journal":{"name":"Wetlands","volume":"46 6","pages":"79"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13341704/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Wetlands","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13157-026-02044-9","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/7/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Rapid wetland assessments are designed to require minimal field effort (e.g. half-day site visit), but still provide critical information on wetland ecological condition and functioning. Many wetland functions occur within or are supported by the soil, yet soil condition is seldom-or only minimally-included in most state rapid assessments. We focus on the Ohio Rapid Assessment Method for wetlands (ORAM) and evaluate soil bulk density as an indicator of wetland soil condition that can be incorporated into rapid wetland assessments. Soil bulk density ([Formula: see text]) is relatively easy to measure and requires only basic instrumentation. It also correlates well with more intensive metrics of soil condition (e.g. carbon content, aggregation). We sampled 45 wetlands in west-central Ohio, that exhibited a range of wetland type and ecological condition. From each wetland, we collected five soil cores (to 15-cm depth) and then analyzed the soil samples for [Formula: see text], carbon content, and water-stable aggregates. These three measurements were used to develop a four-bin [Formula: see text] metric of soil condition. Incorporating this metric into the current ORAM improved relationships with [Formula: see text] (r = 0.48 to r = 0.58) and soil condition (r = -0.53 to r = -0.64). Additional gains could be achieved with higher weighting of the [Formula: see text] metric. Alternatively, the current scoring system could be left intact, but protection of wetlands with high quality soils ensured by providing special status when [Formula: see text] is less than 0.40 g cm[Formula: see text] (highest quality) or less than 0.73 g cm[Formula: see text] (high quality).
Supplementary information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s13157-026-02044-9.
期刊介绍:
Wetlands is an international journal concerned with all aspects of wetlands biology, ecology, hydrology, water chemistry, soil and sediment characteristics, management, and laws and regulations. The journal is published 6 times per year, with the goal of centralizing the publication of pioneering wetlands work that has otherwise been spread among a myriad of journals. Since wetlands research usually requires an interdisciplinary approach, the journal in not limited to specific disciplines but seeks manuscripts reporting research results from all relevant disciplines. Manuscripts focusing on management topics and regulatory considerations relevant to wetlands are also suitable. Submissions may be in the form of articles or short notes. Timely review articles will also be considered, but the subject and content should be discussed with the Editor-in-Chief (NDSU.wetlands.editor@ndsu.edu) prior to submission. All papers published in Wetlands are reviewed by two qualified peers, an Associate Editor, and the Editor-in-Chief prior to acceptance and publication. All papers must present new information, must be factual and original, and must not have been published elsewhere.