Psychological Harm in High-Fidelity Simulation: A Concept Analysis.

IF 2.5 Q1 NURSING
Nursing Research and Practice Pub Date : 2026-07-08 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.1155/nrp/2002234
Mohamed Toufic El Hussein, Dawson S Sheehan
{"title":"Psychological Harm in High-Fidelity Simulation: A Concept Analysis.","authors":"Mohamed Toufic El Hussein, Dawson S Sheehan","doi":"10.1155/nrp/2002234","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To clarify and define the concept of psychological harm in high-fidelity simulation.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>High-fidelity simulation is widely used in undergraduate nursing education to promote clinical competence and decision-making. While often beneficial, emotionally intense or poorly supported simulation experiences can result in psychological harm, an underrecognized phenomenon that may disrupt learning, self-efficacy, and professional development. Current literature lacks conceptual clarity to distinguish psychological harm from expected simulation-related stress.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Concept analysis.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>A concept analysis was conducted using the method developed by Walker and Avant to explore psychological harm in the context of high-fidelity simulation.</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>Peer-reviewed literature published between 2010 and 2025 was retrieved from MEDLINE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, and TRIP Pro. Inclusion criteria focused on articles that discussed psychological or emotional responses to high-fidelity simulation in healthcare education. Empirical peer-reviewed literature informed the identification of defining attributes, antecedents, and consequences. Practice-oriented documents and standards were reviewed to contextualize disciplinary usage; studies focused solely on technical skill acquisition were excluded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Three defining attributes were identified: (1) absence of psychological safety, (2) emotional disruption exceeding expected learning stress, and (3) sustained emotional impact beyond the simulation experience. Antecedents included emotionally intense content, insufficient preparation, unskilled facilitation, and performance-oriented learning environments. Consequences included diminished self-confidence, avoidance of future simulation, and impaired transfer of learning to clinical practice. Recent qualitative findings revealed that harm is often internalized and shaped by relational dynamics with simulationists and peers.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Psychological harm in high-fidelity simulation is a multidimensional, learner-dependent experience that can hinder both academic and professional development. This concept analysis offers a foundational definition and theoretical structure to support future research, education, and policy related to learner well-being in simulation.</p>","PeriodicalId":46917,"journal":{"name":"Nursing Research and Practice","volume":"2026 ","pages":"2002234"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13343475/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nursing Research and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/nrp/2002234","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: To clarify and define the concept of psychological harm in high-fidelity simulation.

Background: High-fidelity simulation is widely used in undergraduate nursing education to promote clinical competence and decision-making. While often beneficial, emotionally intense or poorly supported simulation experiences can result in psychological harm, an underrecognized phenomenon that may disrupt learning, self-efficacy, and professional development. Current literature lacks conceptual clarity to distinguish psychological harm from expected simulation-related stress.

Design: Concept analysis.

Methodology: A concept analysis was conducted using the method developed by Walker and Avant to explore psychological harm in the context of high-fidelity simulation.

Data sources: Peer-reviewed literature published between 2010 and 2025 was retrieved from MEDLINE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, and TRIP Pro. Inclusion criteria focused on articles that discussed psychological or emotional responses to high-fidelity simulation in healthcare education. Empirical peer-reviewed literature informed the identification of defining attributes, antecedents, and consequences. Practice-oriented documents and standards were reviewed to contextualize disciplinary usage; studies focused solely on technical skill acquisition were excluded.

Results: Three defining attributes were identified: (1) absence of psychological safety, (2) emotional disruption exceeding expected learning stress, and (3) sustained emotional impact beyond the simulation experience. Antecedents included emotionally intense content, insufficient preparation, unskilled facilitation, and performance-oriented learning environments. Consequences included diminished self-confidence, avoidance of future simulation, and impaired transfer of learning to clinical practice. Recent qualitative findings revealed that harm is often internalized and shaped by relational dynamics with simulationists and peers.

Conclusion: Psychological harm in high-fidelity simulation is a multidimensional, learner-dependent experience that can hinder both academic and professional development. This concept analysis offers a foundational definition and theoretical structure to support future research, education, and policy related to learner well-being in simulation.

高保真仿真中的心理危害:概念分析。
目的:澄清和界定高保真仿真中心理伤害的概念。背景:高保真仿真被广泛应用于本科护理教学中,以提高临床能力和决策能力。虽然通常是有益的,但情感强烈或缺乏支持的模拟体验可能会导致心理伤害,这是一种未被认识到的现象,可能会破坏学习、自我效能和专业发展。目前的文献缺乏清晰的概念来区分心理伤害和预期的模拟相关压力。设计:概念分析。方法:采用Walker和Avant开发的方法进行概念分析,探讨高保真仿真背景下的心理伤害。数据来源:2010年至2025年间发表的同行评审文献检索自MEDLINE、CINAHL、PsycINFO和TRIP Pro。纳入标准侧重于讨论医疗保健教育中对高保真模拟的心理或情绪反应的文章。经验性的同行评议文献为定义属性、前因和结果的识别提供了信息。以实践为导向的文件和标准进行了审查,以使学科的使用情境化;仅关注技术技能获得的研究被排除在外。结果:确定了三个定义属性:(1)缺乏心理安全感;(2)情绪干扰超过预期的学习压力;(3)持续的情绪影响超出模拟体验。前因包括情绪紧张的内容、不充分的准备、不熟练的引导和以绩效为导向的学习环境。结果包括自信心下降,避免未来的模拟,以及学习到临床实践的转移受损。最近的定性研究结果显示,伤害通常是内化的,并由与模拟者和同伴的关系动态形成。结论:高保真模拟中的心理伤害是一种多维度的、学习者依赖的体验,可能会阻碍学术和专业发展。这一概念分析提供了一个基本的定义和理论结构,以支持未来与模拟学习者幸福感相关的研究、教育和政策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
21
审稿时长
19 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书