Adrian A Maung, Christofer Anderson, Andrew Tsuei Maung, Tyler Jones, Jane R Cowan, Kimberly A Davis
{"title":"Door to needle time: has the 2022 ACS VRC interventional radiology readiness standard made a difference?","authors":"Adrian A Maung, Christofer Anderson, Andrew Tsuei Maung, Tyler Jones, Jane R Cowan, Kimberly A Davis","doi":"10.1136/tsaco-2025-002186","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>In 2022, the revised American College of Surgeons (ACS) Verification Review and Consultation (VRC) standards required that all level I and II trauma centers have the resources for an interventional radiology procedure for hemorrhage control to begin within 60 min of request. We sought to investigate the impact of this new standard on time to angiography and patient outcomes in a national database with the hypothesis that the ACS standard would result in quicker time to angiography and improved outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a retrospective review of all patients included in the 2019, 2021 and 2023 ACS Trauma Quality Programs Participant Use File who underwent urgent angiography for hemorrhage control in Level I and II trauma centers. We compared times and outcomes pre-implementation and post implementation of this standard.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The time to angiography, as measured from emergency department admission, was comparable before and after the implementation of the standard (1.91, 1.86 and 1.91 hours in 2019, 2021 and 2023 respectively, p=0.159). The cohorts also had no significant difference in mortality (15.3, 14.4 vs 14.8%), total length of stay (LOS) (15.6, 15.8 vs 16.1 days) or intensive care unit LOS (8.2, 8.1 vs 8.3 days). There were significant differences with increased blood product transfusion volumes in 2019 (1,386 (2019), 1,228 (2021) and 1,226 mL (2023), p<0.001) as well as increased whole blood use in 2023 (134 (2021) vs 219 mL (2023), p<0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Despite the new VRC standard, there has, to date, been no significant impact on time to angiography or patient outcomes with the possible exception of blood transfusion volumes.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>IV: retrospective study with more than one negative criterion.</p>","PeriodicalId":23307,"journal":{"name":"Trauma Surgery & Acute Care Open","volume":"11 3","pages":"e002186"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13343078/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Trauma Surgery & Acute Care Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/tsaco-2025-002186","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: In 2022, the revised American College of Surgeons (ACS) Verification Review and Consultation (VRC) standards required that all level I and II trauma centers have the resources for an interventional radiology procedure for hemorrhage control to begin within 60 min of request. We sought to investigate the impact of this new standard on time to angiography and patient outcomes in a national database with the hypothesis that the ACS standard would result in quicker time to angiography and improved outcomes.
Methods: This is a retrospective review of all patients included in the 2019, 2021 and 2023 ACS Trauma Quality Programs Participant Use File who underwent urgent angiography for hemorrhage control in Level I and II trauma centers. We compared times and outcomes pre-implementation and post implementation of this standard.
Results: The time to angiography, as measured from emergency department admission, was comparable before and after the implementation of the standard (1.91, 1.86 and 1.91 hours in 2019, 2021 and 2023 respectively, p=0.159). The cohorts also had no significant difference in mortality (15.3, 14.4 vs 14.8%), total length of stay (LOS) (15.6, 15.8 vs 16.1 days) or intensive care unit LOS (8.2, 8.1 vs 8.3 days). There were significant differences with increased blood product transfusion volumes in 2019 (1,386 (2019), 1,228 (2021) and 1,226 mL (2023), p<0.001) as well as increased whole blood use in 2023 (134 (2021) vs 219 mL (2023), p<0.001).
Conclusion: Despite the new VRC standard, there has, to date, been no significant impact on time to angiography or patient outcomes with the possible exception of blood transfusion volumes.
Level of evidence: IV: retrospective study with more than one negative criterion.
目的:2022年,修订后的美国外科医师学会(ACS)验证审查和咨询(VRC)标准要求所有一级和二级创伤中心拥有资源,可以在请求后60分钟内开始进行出血控制的介入放射学手术。我们试图在一个国家数据库中调查这一新标准对血管造影时间和患者预后的影响,并假设ACS标准可以缩短血管造影时间并改善预后。方法:回顾性分析2019年、2021年和2023年ACS创伤质量计划参与者使用档案中所有在一级和二级创伤中心接受紧急血管造影以控制出血的患者。我们比较了实施前和实施后的时间和结果。结果:从急诊科入院开始进行血管造影的时间,在标准实施前后具有可比性(2019年、2021年和2023年分别为1.91、1.86和1.91小时,p=0.159)。两组在死亡率(15.3、14.4 vs 14.8%)、总住院时间(LOS)(15.6、15.8 vs 16.1天)或重症监护病房LOS(8.2、8.1 vs 8.3天)方面也无显著差异。2019年输血量的增加(1,386 mL(2019)、1,228 mL(2021)和1,226 mL(2023))存在显著差异。结论:尽管有新的VRC标准,但迄今为止,除了输血量可能之外,对血管造影时间或患者预后没有显著影响。证据等级:IV:有一个以上阴性标准的回顾性研究。