Impact of pediatric urgent care clinics on emergency department utilization and patient flow: a pre-post cohort study in Saudi Arabia.

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q1 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Abdulhameed Al Khalaf, Alla Albisher, Ahmed Al Shams, Mohammed Al Khalaf, Jassem Althani, Jassim Al Essa, Ali Al Ali, Mohammed Alwabari, Haidar Alhassan
{"title":"Impact of pediatric urgent care clinics on emergency department utilization and patient flow: a pre-post cohort study in Saudi Arabia.","authors":"Abdulhameed Al Khalaf, Alla Albisher, Ahmed Al Shams, Mohammed Al Khalaf, Jassem Althani, Jassim Al Essa, Ali Al Ali, Mohammed Alwabari, Haidar Alhassan","doi":"10.1186/s12873-026-01670-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Pediatric emergency departments (PEDs) frequently experience overcrowding, much of it related to low-acuity visits that may be manageable in outpatient settings. Pediatric Urgent Care Clinics (PUCCs) have been introduced to help accommodate such demand, but evidence from the Gulf region remains limited.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate changes in PED utilization, acuity mix, and patient-flow indicators following implementation of a PUCC at the Maternity and Children's Hospital in Alahsa, Saudi Arabia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective pre-post observational cohort study using electronic health record data from October 2023 to June 2024 (pre-implementation) and October 2024 to June 2025 (post-implementation). Variables included Canadian Triage and Acuity Scale (CTAS) level, timestamps for triage, physician start, and discharge, and demographic characteristics. Outcomes included PED visit volume, acuity distribution, door-to-doctor time, and length of stay (LOS). Continuous variables were summarized using medians with interquartile ranges (IQRs) and 5% trimmed means; categorical variables were compared using chi-square tests, and effect sizes for binary outcomes were expressed as risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 147,175 PED encounters were analyzed, including 84,595 in the pre-implementation period and 62,580 in the post-implementation period. In the post-implementation period, an additional 24,962 encounters were managed in the PUCC. The proportion of low-acuity PED visits (CTAS 4-5) decreased from 81.1% to 50.2% (RR 0.62; 95% CI 0.61-0.62; p < 0.001). Mean daily PED encounter volume declined from 308.7 to 229.2 encounters/day (incidence rate ratio 0.74; 95% CI 0.74-0.75; p < 0.001). Median door-to-doctor time was 37 min (IQR 22-63) before implementation and 39 min (IQR 22-65) after implementation, while median LOS increased from 62 min (IQR 34-112) to 76 min (IQR 43-131) (p < 0.001 for distributional comparisons).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Implementation of a PUCC was associated with lower PED visit volume, a reduced proportion of low-acuity PED encounters, and a small absolute difference in door-to-doctor time, while PED LOS was longer in the post-implementation period. These findings suggest that a PUCC model may help redistribute lower-acuity pediatric encounters within a hospital-based urgent and emergency care system. Further studies are needed to evaluate safety outcomes and to better account for operational confounding.</p>","PeriodicalId":9002,"journal":{"name":"BMC Emergency Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13637253/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12873-026-01670-0","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Pediatric emergency departments (PEDs) frequently experience overcrowding, much of it related to low-acuity visits that may be manageable in outpatient settings. Pediatric Urgent Care Clinics (PUCCs) have been introduced to help accommodate such demand, but evidence from the Gulf region remains limited.

Objectives: To evaluate changes in PED utilization, acuity mix, and patient-flow indicators following implementation of a PUCC at the Maternity and Children's Hospital in Alahsa, Saudi Arabia.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective pre-post observational cohort study using electronic health record data from October 2023 to June 2024 (pre-implementation) and October 2024 to June 2025 (post-implementation). Variables included Canadian Triage and Acuity Scale (CTAS) level, timestamps for triage, physician start, and discharge, and demographic characteristics. Outcomes included PED visit volume, acuity distribution, door-to-doctor time, and length of stay (LOS). Continuous variables were summarized using medians with interquartile ranges (IQRs) and 5% trimmed means; categorical variables were compared using chi-square tests, and effect sizes for binary outcomes were expressed as risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals.

Results: A total of 147,175 PED encounters were analyzed, including 84,595 in the pre-implementation period and 62,580 in the post-implementation period. In the post-implementation period, an additional 24,962 encounters were managed in the PUCC. The proportion of low-acuity PED visits (CTAS 4-5) decreased from 81.1% to 50.2% (RR 0.62; 95% CI 0.61-0.62; p < 0.001). Mean daily PED encounter volume declined from 308.7 to 229.2 encounters/day (incidence rate ratio 0.74; 95% CI 0.74-0.75; p < 0.001). Median door-to-doctor time was 37 min (IQR 22-63) before implementation and 39 min (IQR 22-65) after implementation, while median LOS increased from 62 min (IQR 34-112) to 76 min (IQR 43-131) (p < 0.001 for distributional comparisons).

Conclusion: Implementation of a PUCC was associated with lower PED visit volume, a reduced proportion of low-acuity PED encounters, and a small absolute difference in door-to-doctor time, while PED LOS was longer in the post-implementation period. These findings suggest that a PUCC model may help redistribute lower-acuity pediatric encounters within a hospital-based urgent and emergency care system. Further studies are needed to evaluate safety outcomes and to better account for operational confounding.

儿科急诊诊所对急诊科使用率和患者流量的影响:沙特阿拉伯的一项前后队列研究。
背景:儿科急诊科(儿科急诊科)经常出现人满为患的情况,其中大部分与在门诊环境中可以管理的低视力就诊有关。儿科紧急护理诊所(PUCCs)已被引入以帮助满足这种需求,但来自海湾地区的证据仍然有限。目的:评估在沙特阿拉伯Alahsa妇幼医院实施PUCC后,PED利用率、急症组合和患者流量指标的变化。方法:使用2023年10月至2024年6月(实施前)和2024年10月至2025年6月(实施后)的电子健康记录数据进行回顾性观察前后队列研究。变量包括加拿大分诊和敏锐度量表(CTAS)水平、分诊时间戳、医生开始和出院以及人口统计学特征。结果包括PED访问量、视力分布、从门到医生的时间和住院时间(LOS)。连续变量采用四分位数区间(IQRs)和5%裁剪均值的中位数进行汇总;分类变量采用卡方检验进行比较,二元结果的效应量以95%置信区间的风险比(rr)表示。结果:共分析了147,175例PED就诊,其中实施前84,595例,实施后62,580例。在执行后期间,方案协调会又管理了24 962次会议。低视力PED就诊比例(CTAS 4-5)从81.1%下降到50.2% (RR 0.62; 95% CI 0.61-0.62; p)结论:实施PUCC与较低的PED就诊量、低视力PED就诊比例减少以及从门到医生时间的绝对差异较小相关,而PED LOS在实施后的时间更长。这些发现表明,PUCC模型可能有助于在医院急诊和急救系统中重新分配低敏锐度儿科就诊。需要进一步的研究来评估安全性结果并更好地解释操作混淆。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Emergency Medicine
BMC Emergency Medicine Medicine-Emergency Medicine
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
8.00%
发文量
178
审稿时长
29 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Emergency Medicine is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all urgent and emergency aspects of medicine, in both practice and basic research. In addition, the journal covers aspects of disaster medicine and medicine in special locations, such as conflict areas and military medicine, together with articles concerning healthcare services in the emergency departments.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书