Traditional Disease Risk Factors Outperform Epigenetic Clocks as Predictors of Non-Communicable Disease Morbidity in a Middle-Aged Cohort.

IF 7.1 1区 医学 Q1 CELL BIOLOGY
Aging Cell Pub Date : 2026-07-01 DOI:10.1111/acel.70626
Daria Kostiniuk, Flóra Székely, Leo-Pekka Lyytikäinen, Jo Ciantar, Sonja Rajić, Pashupati P Mishra, Terho Lehtimäki, Katja Pahkala, Suvi Rovio, Juha Mykkänen, Olli Raitakari, Emma Raitoharju, Saara Marttila
{"title":"Traditional Disease Risk Factors Outperform Epigenetic Clocks as Predictors of Non-Communicable Disease Morbidity in a Middle-Aged Cohort.","authors":"Daria Kostiniuk, Flóra Székely, Leo-Pekka Lyytikäinen, Jo Ciantar, Sonja Rajić, Pashupati P Mishra, Terho Lehtimäki, Katja Pahkala, Suvi Rovio, Juha Mykkänen, Olli Raitakari, Emma Raitoharju, Saara Marttila","doi":"10.1111/acel.70626","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>DNA methylation-based epigenetic clocks have been highlighted as promising biomarkers of ageing, and they have been shown to robustly predict morbidity and mortality. However, current literature is lacking a formal analysis of the increased prediction accuracy, or the added value, of the epigenetic clocks over traditional risk factors, such as body composition, smoking, or alcohol consumption, in predicting common chronic diseases. Here, we have compared the most commonly used epigenetic clocks and traditional risk factors as predictors of incidence of ageing-associated non-communicable chronic disease in a 7-to-9-year follow-up in a middle-aged population cohort (n = 1108, aged 34 to 49 years at baseline). In our cohort, a statistical model consisting of a combination of traditional risk factors (age, sex, smoking, alcohol consumption, WHR, BMI) outperforms any model including an epigenetic clock. The added value of epigenetic clock measurements over simple and affordable traditional risk factors should be clearly established if epigenetic clocks are to be used in clinical settings or as tools of personal health monitoring.</p>","PeriodicalId":119,"journal":{"name":"Aging Cell","volume":"25 7","pages":"e70626"},"PeriodicalIF":7.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13347623/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aging Cell","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/acel.70626","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CELL BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

DNA methylation-based epigenetic clocks have been highlighted as promising biomarkers of ageing, and they have been shown to robustly predict morbidity and mortality. However, current literature is lacking a formal analysis of the increased prediction accuracy, or the added value, of the epigenetic clocks over traditional risk factors, such as body composition, smoking, or alcohol consumption, in predicting common chronic diseases. Here, we have compared the most commonly used epigenetic clocks and traditional risk factors as predictors of incidence of ageing-associated non-communicable chronic disease in a 7-to-9-year follow-up in a middle-aged population cohort (n = 1108, aged 34 to 49 years at baseline). In our cohort, a statistical model consisting of a combination of traditional risk factors (age, sex, smoking, alcohol consumption, WHR, BMI) outperforms any model including an epigenetic clock. The added value of epigenetic clock measurements over simple and affordable traditional risk factors should be clearly established if epigenetic clocks are to be used in clinical settings or as tools of personal health monitoring.

传统疾病风险因素优于表观遗传时钟作为非传染性疾病发病率的中年队列预测因子。
基于DNA甲基化的表观遗传时钟已被强调为有前途的衰老生物标志物,它们已被证明可以可靠地预测发病率和死亡率。然而,目前的文献缺乏对表观遗传时钟在预测常见慢性疾病方面比传统风险因素(如身体成分、吸烟或饮酒)的预测准确性或附加值的正式分析。在这里,我们比较了最常用的表观遗传时钟和传统风险因素作为衰老相关非传染性慢性疾病发病率的预测因子,对一个中年人群队列(n = 1108,基线年龄34 - 49岁)进行了7- 9年的随访。在我们的队列中,由传统风险因素(年龄、性别、吸烟、饮酒、腰高比、身体质量指数)组成的统计模型优于任何包括表观遗传时钟的模型。如果表观遗传时钟要用于临床环境或作为个人健康监测工具,那么表观遗传时钟测量的附加价值应该明确地确定,而不是简单和负担得起的传统风险因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Aging Cell
Aging Cell Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Cell Biology
自引率
2.60%
发文量
212
期刊介绍: Aging Cell is an Open Access journal that focuses on the core aspects of the biology of aging, encompassing the entire spectrum of geroscience. The journal's content is dedicated to publishing research that uncovers the mechanisms behind the aging process and explores the connections between aging and various age-related diseases. This journal aims to provide a comprehensive understanding of the biological underpinnings of aging and its implications for human health. The journal is widely recognized and its content is abstracted and indexed by numerous databases and services, which facilitates its accessibility and impact in the scientific community. These include: Academic Search (EBSCO Publishing) Academic Search Alumni Edition (EBSCO Publishing) Academic Search Premier (EBSCO Publishing) Biological Science Database (ProQuest) CAS: Chemical Abstracts Service (ACS) Embase (Elsevier) InfoTrac (GALE Cengage) Ingenta Select ISI Alerting Services Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition (Clarivate Analytics) MEDLINE/PubMed (NLM) Natural Science Collection (ProQuest) PubMed Dietary Supplement Subset (NLM) Science Citation Index Expanded (Clarivate Analytics) SciTech Premium Collection (ProQuest) Web of Science (Clarivate Analytics) Being indexed in these databases ensures that the research published in Aging Cell is discoverable by researchers, clinicians, and other professionals interested in the field of aging and its associated health issues. This broad coverage helps to disseminate the journal's findings and contributes to the advancement of knowledge in geroscience.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书