Context-Aware Multilevel Classification of Semantic Relations in Drug-Adverse Drug Reaction (ADR) Networks–Predicting Drug-Induced Liver Injury (DILI) as a Case Study

IF 4.1 3区 医学 Q2 CHEMISTRY, MEDICINAL
Chemical Research in Toxicology Pub Date : 2026-07-20 Epub Date: 2026-07-08 DOI:10.1021/acs.chemrestox.5c00252
Rein Vos*, Erik M. van Mulligen and Jan A. Kors, 
{"title":"Context-Aware Multilevel Classification of Semantic Relations in Drug-Adverse Drug Reaction (ADR) Networks–Predicting Drug-Induced Liver Injury (DILI) as a Case Study","authors":"Rein Vos*,&nbsp;Erik M. van Mulligen and Jan A. Kors,&nbsp;","doi":"10.1021/acs.chemrestox.5c00252","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >Adverse drug reactions (ADRs) are a major concern for public health and patient safety and a burden in drug discovery, with drug-induced liver injury (DILI) as a prototypical case. Next to computational models such as deep learning, knowledge graph models can help capture biological systems and pathways underlying toxic effects. We present a hierarchical, context-aware knowledge graph model to detect ADRs, with DILI as a case study. The model builds on a commercial knowledge graph integrating over 200 life-science databases and millions of publications and patents. It combines translation- and path-based methods, where two-hop paths link drugs and ADRs via an intermediate concept (e.g., genes, proteins, pathways). These paths are combined in path bundles as the graph’s basic units. Evaluation used the FDA DILIrank data set of DILI-positive and DILI-negative drugs, mapped onto the graph. Performance was evaluated with classification metrics, including the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and Matthews correlation coefficient (MCC). The output probabilities of the path bundles generated by base classifiers formed the input for multilevel statistical modeling. Multilevel analysis was used to predict DILI risk of the drugs while accounting for the dependencies of the path bundles on the ADR contexts and on the different relations in the graph. The four-level model performed best (AUC = 0.850; MCC = 0.639). Average prediction probabilities showed good separation (0.641 for DILI-positive drugs and 0.402 for DILI-negative drugs). Additional results included the correct classification of 29 of the 37 wrongly classified drugs by a QSAR study using molecular descriptors. The added value of a cascaded QSAR and knowledge graph approach was shown on a 130-compound subset of the DeepDILI test set, where the combined model rescued additional DILI-positive drugs missed by DeepDILI alone at the expense of a limited number of false positives. The study model and data are available through https://github.com/mi-erasmusmc/multilevel_dili.</p>","PeriodicalId":31,"journal":{"name":"Chemical Research in Toxicology","volume":"39 7","pages":"1274–1287"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chemical Research in Toxicology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.chemrestox.5c00252","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/7/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MEDICINAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Adverse drug reactions (ADRs) are a major concern for public health and patient safety and a burden in drug discovery, with drug-induced liver injury (DILI) as a prototypical case. Next to computational models such as deep learning, knowledge graph models can help capture biological systems and pathways underlying toxic effects. We present a hierarchical, context-aware knowledge graph model to detect ADRs, with DILI as a case study. The model builds on a commercial knowledge graph integrating over 200 life-science databases and millions of publications and patents. It combines translation- and path-based methods, where two-hop paths link drugs and ADRs via an intermediate concept (e.g., genes, proteins, pathways). These paths are combined in path bundles as the graph’s basic units. Evaluation used the FDA DILIrank data set of DILI-positive and DILI-negative drugs, mapped onto the graph. Performance was evaluated with classification metrics, including the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and Matthews correlation coefficient (MCC). The output probabilities of the path bundles generated by base classifiers formed the input for multilevel statistical modeling. Multilevel analysis was used to predict DILI risk of the drugs while accounting for the dependencies of the path bundles on the ADR contexts and on the different relations in the graph. The four-level model performed best (AUC = 0.850; MCC = 0.639). Average prediction probabilities showed good separation (0.641 for DILI-positive drugs and 0.402 for DILI-negative drugs). Additional results included the correct classification of 29 of the 37 wrongly classified drugs by a QSAR study using molecular descriptors. The added value of a cascaded QSAR and knowledge graph approach was shown on a 130-compound subset of the DeepDILI test set, where the combined model rescued additional DILI-positive drugs missed by DeepDILI alone at the expense of a limited number of false positives. The study model and data are available through https://github.com/mi-erasmusmc/multilevel_dili.

Abstract Image

药物不良反应(ADR)网络中上下文感知的多层语义关系分类——以预测药物性肝损伤(DILI)为例
药物不良反应(adr)是公共卫生和患者安全的主要问题,也是药物发现的一个负担,药物性肝损伤(DILI)是一个典型的案例。除了深度学习等计算模型之外,知识图谱模型还可以帮助捕获潜在毒性作用的生物系统和途径。我们提出了一个分层的、上下文感知的知识图模型来检测adr,并以DILI为例进行了研究。该模型建立在集成了200多个生命科学数据库和数百万出版物和专利的商业知识图谱之上。它结合了基于翻译和路径的方法,其中双跳路径通过中间概念(例如,基因,蛋白质,途径)连接药物和adr。这些路径组合在路径束中作为图的基本单元。评估采用FDA DILIrank数据集对dili阳性和dili阴性药物进行评估,并将其映射到图表上。采用分类指标评价疗效,包括受试者工作特征曲线下面积(AUC)和马修斯相关系数(MCC)。由基分类器生成的路径束的输出概率构成了多层次统计建模的输入。多水平分析用于预测药物的DILI风险,同时考虑路径束对ADR上下文和图中不同关系的依赖性。四层次模型最优(AUC = 0.850; MCC = 0.639)。平均预测概率分离性较好(阳性药物为0.641,阴性药物为0.402)。其他结果包括使用分子描述符的QSAR研究对37种错误分类药物中的29种进行了正确分类。在DeepDILI测试集的130个化合物子集上显示了级联QSAR和知识图方法的附加价值,其中组合模型以有限数量的假阳性为代价,挽救了单独DeepDILI错过的额外的dili阳性药物。研究模型和数据可通过https://github.com/mi-erasmusmc/multilevel_dili获得。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
7.30%
发文量
215
审稿时长
3.5 months
期刊介绍: Chemical Research in Toxicology publishes Articles, Rapid Reports, Chemical Profiles, Reviews, Perspectives, Letters to the Editor, and ToxWatch on a wide range of topics in Toxicology that inform a chemical and molecular understanding and capacity to predict biological outcomes on the basis of structures and processes. The overarching goal of activities reported in the Journal are to provide knowledge and innovative approaches needed to promote intelligent solutions for human safety and ecosystem preservation. The journal emphasizes insight concerning mechanisms of toxicity over phenomenological observations. It upholds rigorous chemical, physical and mathematical standards for characterization and application of modern techniques.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书