High-Energy Low-Protein Formula Plus Low-Protein Diet Improves Subjective Global Assessment-Defined Nutritional Status in Nondialysis Chronic Kidney Disease: An Open-Label Randomized Trial.

IF 3.2
Yi-Hsiang Su, Chia-Chun Lee, Ming-Cheng Wang, Te-Hui Kuo, Hung-Lien Wu, Chin-Chung Tseng
{"title":"High-Energy Low-Protein Formula Plus Low-Protein Diet Improves Subjective Global Assessment-Defined Nutritional Status in Nondialysis Chronic Kidney Disease: An Open-Label Randomized Trial.","authors":"Yi-Hsiang Su, Chia-Chun Lee, Ming-Cheng Wang, Te-Hui Kuo, Hung-Lien Wu, Chin-Chung Tseng","doi":"10.1053/j.jrn.2026.06.009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Protein-energy wasting is common in chronic kidney disease (CKD) and maintaining adequate energy intake while counseling patients toward a low-protein diet remains challenging. We evaluated whether adding a kidney-specific, high-energy low-protein formula containing free amino acids, dietary fiber, vitamins, and minerals to dietitian-led counseling improved nutritional status in nondialysis CKD stages 3-5.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this 6-month, single-center, open-label, largely randomized trial analyzed according to the as-treated principle, all participants received counseling toward protein intake of 0.6-0.8 g/kg ideal body weight/day and energy intake of 25-35 kcal/kg ideal body weight/day. The intervention group (n = 48) received 2 daily sachets of the study formula; controls (n = 48) received counseling alone. The primary outcome was improvement in subjective global assessment (SGA) score at 6 months, defined as an increase of at least 1 point.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The intervention group had a higher proportion of participants with SGA improvement than controls (47.9% vs. 25.0%; P = .020; odds ratio, 2.76; 95% confidence interval, 1.16-6.55). Excluding within-category transitions from SGA score 6 to 7 yielded a similar result (44.4% vs. 25.0%; P = .049). The intervention effect was greatest in participants with baseline body mass index <23 kg/m<sup>2</sup>. Nutritional profiles favored the intervention, and the between-group difference in estimated glomerular filtration rate decline slope was not significant.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In nondialysis CKD stages 3-5, adding a kidney-specific, high-energy low-protein formula to counseling toward low-protein diet targets was associated with improved SGA-defined nutritional status without evidence of accelerated estimated glomerular filtration rate decline over 6 months.</p>","PeriodicalId":520689,"journal":{"name":"Journal of renal nutrition : the official journal of the Council on Renal Nutrition of the National Kidney Foundation","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of renal nutrition : the official journal of the Council on Renal Nutrition of the National Kidney Foundation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1053/j.jrn.2026.06.009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Protein-energy wasting is common in chronic kidney disease (CKD) and maintaining adequate energy intake while counseling patients toward a low-protein diet remains challenging. We evaluated whether adding a kidney-specific, high-energy low-protein formula containing free amino acids, dietary fiber, vitamins, and minerals to dietitian-led counseling improved nutritional status in nondialysis CKD stages 3-5.

Methods: In this 6-month, single-center, open-label, largely randomized trial analyzed according to the as-treated principle, all participants received counseling toward protein intake of 0.6-0.8 g/kg ideal body weight/day and energy intake of 25-35 kcal/kg ideal body weight/day. The intervention group (n = 48) received 2 daily sachets of the study formula; controls (n = 48) received counseling alone. The primary outcome was improvement in subjective global assessment (SGA) score at 6 months, defined as an increase of at least 1 point.

Results: The intervention group had a higher proportion of participants with SGA improvement than controls (47.9% vs. 25.0%; P = .020; odds ratio, 2.76; 95% confidence interval, 1.16-6.55). Excluding within-category transitions from SGA score 6 to 7 yielded a similar result (44.4% vs. 25.0%; P = .049). The intervention effect was greatest in participants with baseline body mass index <23 kg/m2. Nutritional profiles favored the intervention, and the between-group difference in estimated glomerular filtration rate decline slope was not significant.

Conclusions: In nondialysis CKD stages 3-5, adding a kidney-specific, high-energy low-protein formula to counseling toward low-protein diet targets was associated with improved SGA-defined nutritional status without evidence of accelerated estimated glomerular filtration rate decline over 6 months.

高能量低蛋白配方加低蛋白饮食可改善非透析慢性肾病患者主观总体评估定义的营养状况:一项开放标签随机试验
目的:蛋白质能量浪费在慢性肾脏疾病(CKD)中很常见,在向患者提供低蛋白饮食(LPD)建议的同时保持足够的能量摄入仍然具有挑战性。我们评估了在营养师主导的咨询中添加含有游离氨基酸、膳食纤维、维生素和矿物质的肾脏特异性高能量、低蛋白配方是否能改善非透析CKD 3-5期患者的营养状况。方法:在这项为期6个月的单中心、开放标签、随机试验中,所有参与者都接受了蛋白质摄入量为0.6-0.8 g/kg理想体重(IBW)/天,能量摄入量为25-35 kcal/kg IBW/天的咨询。干预组(n = 48)每天服用2包研究配方;对照组(n = 48)单独接受心理咨询。主要结果是6个月时主观总体评估(SGA)评分的改善,定义为至少增加1分。结果:干预组SGA改善的参与者比例高于对照组(47.9% vs. 25.0%; P = 0.020; OR, 2.76; 95% CI, 1.16-6.55)。排除从SGA评分6到7的类别内转换也产生了类似的结果(44.4% vs. 25.0%; P = 0.049)。干预效果在基线BMI为2的参与者中最大。营养状况有利于干预,估计肾小球滤过率(eGFR)下降斜率组间差异不显著。结论:在非透析CKD 3-5期,在LPD目标咨询中加入肾脏特异性高能量、低蛋白配方与sga定义的营养状况改善相关,且6个月内没有eGFR加速下降的证据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书