Dinis Mateus, Catarina Toscano, Ana Catarina Neves, Maria Rodrigues, Ângela Ferreira, Amália Pacheco, Teresa Bombas
{"title":"Female genital mutilation: perception of Portuguese gynecologists and obstetricians - a national survey.","authors":"Dinis Mateus, Catarina Toscano, Ana Catarina Neves, Maria Rodrigues, Ângela Ferreira, Amália Pacheco, Teresa Bombas","doi":"10.1080/13625187.2026.2693185","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Female genital mutilation (FGM) comprises non-medical procedures involving partial or total removal of the external female genitalia and remains a public health concern in Europe, including Portugal, due to migration from high-prevalence countries.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to assess the perceptions and experiences of Portuguese gynaecologists and obstetricians regarding FGM.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A nationwide cross-sectional survey was conducted using a 13-item anonymous electronic questionnaire distributed via email and WhatsApp<sup>®</sup> to Portuguese gynaecologists and obstetricians residents and specialists through professional societies. Data were analysed using descriptive statistics, chi-square tests, and logistic regression (<i>p</i> < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 172 Portuguese gynaecologists and obstetricians completed the survey. Overall, 43.0% reported previous clinical contact with women affected by FGM. Previous contact with FGM was significantly associated with knowledge of FGM classification (OR = 3.66, 95% CI 1.89-7.11; <i>p</i> < 0.001), having sought information or training on FGM (OR = 11.58, 95% CI 5.64-23.80; <i>p</i> < 0.001), awareness of countries where FGM is practiced (OR = 6.07, 95% CI 1.73-21.29; <i>p</i> = 0.005), and reporting cases to authorities (OR = 18.77, 95% CI 2.38-148.00; <i>p</i> = 0.005).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Despite clinical exposure, important knowledge and preparedness gaps persist, highlighting the need for targeted training and national guidance to improve FGM-related care in Portugal.</p>","PeriodicalId":520795,"journal":{"name":"The European journal of contraception & reproductive health care : the official journal of the European Society of Contraception","volume":" ","pages":"408-417"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The European journal of contraception & reproductive health care : the official journal of the European Society of Contraception","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13625187.2026.2693185","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/7/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: Female genital mutilation (FGM) comprises non-medical procedures involving partial or total removal of the external female genitalia and remains a public health concern in Europe, including Portugal, due to migration from high-prevalence countries.
Objective: This study aimed to assess the perceptions and experiences of Portuguese gynaecologists and obstetricians regarding FGM.
Methods: A nationwide cross-sectional survey was conducted using a 13-item anonymous electronic questionnaire distributed via email and WhatsApp® to Portuguese gynaecologists and obstetricians residents and specialists through professional societies. Data were analysed using descriptive statistics, chi-square tests, and logistic regression (p < 0.05).
Results: A total of 172 Portuguese gynaecologists and obstetricians completed the survey. Overall, 43.0% reported previous clinical contact with women affected by FGM. Previous contact with FGM was significantly associated with knowledge of FGM classification (OR = 3.66, 95% CI 1.89-7.11; p < 0.001), having sought information or training on FGM (OR = 11.58, 95% CI 5.64-23.80; p < 0.001), awareness of countries where FGM is practiced (OR = 6.07, 95% CI 1.73-21.29; p = 0.005), and reporting cases to authorities (OR = 18.77, 95% CI 2.38-148.00; p = 0.005).
Conclusions: Despite clinical exposure, important knowledge and preparedness gaps persist, highlighting the need for targeted training and national guidance to improve FGM-related care in Portugal.
导言:女性生殖器切割包括部分或全部切除外部女性生殖器的非医疗程序,由于来自高流行国家的移民,在欧洲(包括葡萄牙)仍然是一个公共卫生问题。目的:本研究旨在评估葡萄牙妇产科医生对女性生殖器切割的看法和经验。方法:采用13项匿名电子问卷,通过电子邮件和WhatsApp®通过专业协会向葡萄牙妇产科医师、住院医师和专家发放,在全国范围内进行横断面调查。使用描述性统计、卡方检验和逻辑回归分析数据(p)。结果:共有172名葡萄牙妇产科医生完成了调查。总体而言,43.0%的人报告曾与女性生殖器切割患者有过临床接触。以前接触过女性生殖器切割与女性生殖器切割分类知识(OR = 3.66, 95% CI 1.89-7.11; p p = 0.005)以及向当局报告病例(OR = 18.77, 95% CI 2.38-148.00; p = 0.005)显著相关。结论:尽管临床暴露,重要的知识和准备差距仍然存在,强调需要有针对性的培训和国家指导,以改善葡萄牙的女性生殖器切割相关护理。