Female genital mutilation: perception of Portuguese gynecologists and obstetricians - a national survey.

IF 2
Dinis Mateus, Catarina Toscano, Ana Catarina Neves, Maria Rodrigues, Ângela Ferreira, Amália Pacheco, Teresa Bombas
{"title":"Female genital mutilation: perception of Portuguese gynecologists and obstetricians - a national survey.","authors":"Dinis Mateus, Catarina Toscano, Ana Catarina Neves, Maria Rodrigues, Ângela Ferreira, Amália Pacheco, Teresa Bombas","doi":"10.1080/13625187.2026.2693185","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Female genital mutilation (FGM) comprises non-medical procedures involving partial or total removal of the external female genitalia and remains a public health concern in Europe, including Portugal, due to migration from high-prevalence countries.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to assess the perceptions and experiences of Portuguese gynaecologists and obstetricians regarding FGM.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A nationwide cross-sectional survey was conducted using a 13-item anonymous electronic questionnaire distributed via email and WhatsApp<sup>®</sup> to Portuguese gynaecologists and obstetricians residents and specialists through professional societies. Data were analysed using descriptive statistics, chi-square tests, and logistic regression (<i>p</i> < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 172 Portuguese gynaecologists and obstetricians completed the survey. Overall, 43.0% reported previous clinical contact with women affected by FGM. Previous contact with FGM was significantly associated with knowledge of FGM classification (OR = 3.66, 95% CI 1.89-7.11; <i>p</i> < 0.001), having sought information or training on FGM (OR = 11.58, 95% CI 5.64-23.80; <i>p</i> < 0.001), awareness of countries where FGM is practiced (OR = 6.07, 95% CI 1.73-21.29; <i>p</i> = 0.005), and reporting cases to authorities (OR = 18.77, 95% CI 2.38-148.00; <i>p</i> = 0.005).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Despite clinical exposure, important knowledge and preparedness gaps persist, highlighting the need for targeted training and national guidance to improve FGM-related care in Portugal.</p>","PeriodicalId":520795,"journal":{"name":"The European journal of contraception & reproductive health care : the official journal of the European Society of Contraception","volume":" ","pages":"408-417"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The European journal of contraception & reproductive health care : the official journal of the European Society of Contraception","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13625187.2026.2693185","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/7/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Female genital mutilation (FGM) comprises non-medical procedures involving partial or total removal of the external female genitalia and remains a public health concern in Europe, including Portugal, due to migration from high-prevalence countries.

Objective: This study aimed to assess the perceptions and experiences of Portuguese gynaecologists and obstetricians regarding FGM.

Methods: A nationwide cross-sectional survey was conducted using a 13-item anonymous electronic questionnaire distributed via email and WhatsApp® to Portuguese gynaecologists and obstetricians residents and specialists through professional societies. Data were analysed using descriptive statistics, chi-square tests, and logistic regression (p < 0.05).

Results: A total of 172 Portuguese gynaecologists and obstetricians completed the survey. Overall, 43.0% reported previous clinical contact with women affected by FGM. Previous contact with FGM was significantly associated with knowledge of FGM classification (OR = 3.66, 95% CI 1.89-7.11; p < 0.001), having sought information or training on FGM (OR = 11.58, 95% CI 5.64-23.80; p < 0.001), awareness of countries where FGM is practiced (OR = 6.07, 95% CI 1.73-21.29; p = 0.005), and reporting cases to authorities (OR = 18.77, 95% CI 2.38-148.00; p = 0.005).

Conclusions: Despite clinical exposure, important knowledge and preparedness gaps persist, highlighting the need for targeted training and national guidance to improve FGM-related care in Portugal.

切割女性生殖器官:葡萄牙妇产科医生的看法-一项全国调查。
导言:女性生殖器切割包括部分或全部切除外部女性生殖器的非医疗程序,由于来自高流行国家的移民,在欧洲(包括葡萄牙)仍然是一个公共卫生问题。目的:本研究旨在评估葡萄牙妇产科医生对女性生殖器切割的看法和经验。方法:采用13项匿名电子问卷,通过电子邮件和WhatsApp®通过专业协会向葡萄牙妇产科医师、住院医师和专家发放,在全国范围内进行横断面调查。使用描述性统计、卡方检验和逻辑回归分析数据(p)。结果:共有172名葡萄牙妇产科医生完成了调查。总体而言,43.0%的人报告曾与女性生殖器切割患者有过临床接触。以前接触过女性生殖器切割与女性生殖器切割分类知识(OR = 3.66, 95% CI 1.89-7.11; p p = 0.005)以及向当局报告病例(OR = 18.77, 95% CI 2.38-148.00; p = 0.005)显著相关。结论:尽管临床暴露,重要的知识和准备差距仍然存在,强调需要有针对性的培训和国家指导,以改善葡萄牙的女性生殖器切割相关护理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书