Intraurethral cross-linked hyaluronic acid/dextranomer (DEXSUI®) injection versus mid-urethral sling for stress urinary incontinence: a comparative short-term outcome analysis.

Mehmet Adıyeke, Suna Yıldırım Karaca, S Anil Ari, Rüyam Ercenk, Mücahit Furkan Balci, İbrahim Karaca
{"title":"Intraurethral cross-linked hyaluronic acid/dextranomer (DEXSUI®) injection versus mid-urethral sling for stress urinary incontinence: a comparative short-term outcome analysis.","authors":"Mehmet Adıyeke, Suna Yıldırım Karaca, S Anil Ari, Rüyam Ercenk, Mücahit Furkan Balci, İbrahim Karaca","doi":"10.32604/cju.2026.074502","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Stress urinary incontinence (SUI) is a prevalent condition that impairs quality of life; while midurethral sling (MUS) surgery is the standard treatment, intraurethral bulking injection offers a minimally invasive alternative. This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of intraurethral cross-linked hyaluronic acid/dextranomer (CLHA/Dx, DEXSUI®) injection with midurethral sling surgery in the treatment of stress urinary incontinence in women.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study included women who presented with stress urinary incontinence to İzmir Bakırçay University, Çiğli Training and Research Hospital between January 2024 and June 2025. Patients underwent either midurethral sling surgery or intraurethral CLHA/Dx (DEXSUI®) injection. Exclusion criteria included urge incontinence, urinary tract infection, and BMI > 35 kg/m². Quality of life was assessed using the International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire-Short Form (ICIQ-SF), Urogenital Distress Inventory-6 (UDI-6), and Incontinence Quality of Life Questionnaire (I-QOL) questionnaires. Treatment success was defined by Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI)-I scores.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Midurethral sling (MUS) was associated with significantly longer operative time (30.5 ± 7.8 vs. 11.4 ± 4.3 min, p < 0.001) and longer hospital stay (median 1 vs. 0 day, p < 0.001). At 1-month follow-up, complete dryness rates were similar (82.4% vs. 79.4%, p = 0.76). Both groups demonstrated significant improvement in ICIQ-SF, UDI-6, and Incontinence Quality of Life Questionnaire (I-QOL) scores compared with baseline (all p < 0.05), with slightly greater improvement observed in the MUS group; between-group differences were not statistically significant. Subgroup analysis by stress urinary incontinence (SUI) severity revealed consistently high dryness rates across mild, moderate, and severe categories, without significant intergroup differences.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Intraurethral CLHA/Dx injection achieved clinical outcomes comparable to MUS, offering a less invasive alternative for SUI treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":520500,"journal":{"name":"The Canadian journal of urology","volume":"33 3","pages":"611-621"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Canadian journal of urology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32604/cju.2026.074502","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Stress urinary incontinence (SUI) is a prevalent condition that impairs quality of life; while midurethral sling (MUS) surgery is the standard treatment, intraurethral bulking injection offers a minimally invasive alternative. This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of intraurethral cross-linked hyaluronic acid/dextranomer (CLHA/Dx, DEXSUI®) injection with midurethral sling surgery in the treatment of stress urinary incontinence in women.

Methods: This retrospective study included women who presented with stress urinary incontinence to İzmir Bakırçay University, Çiğli Training and Research Hospital between January 2024 and June 2025. Patients underwent either midurethral sling surgery or intraurethral CLHA/Dx (DEXSUI®) injection. Exclusion criteria included urge incontinence, urinary tract infection, and BMI > 35 kg/m². Quality of life was assessed using the International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire-Short Form (ICIQ-SF), Urogenital Distress Inventory-6 (UDI-6), and Incontinence Quality of Life Questionnaire (I-QOL) questionnaires. Treatment success was defined by Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI)-I scores.

Results: Midurethral sling (MUS) was associated with significantly longer operative time (30.5 ± 7.8 vs. 11.4 ± 4.3 min, p < 0.001) and longer hospital stay (median 1 vs. 0 day, p < 0.001). At 1-month follow-up, complete dryness rates were similar (82.4% vs. 79.4%, p = 0.76). Both groups demonstrated significant improvement in ICIQ-SF, UDI-6, and Incontinence Quality of Life Questionnaire (I-QOL) scores compared with baseline (all p < 0.05), with slightly greater improvement observed in the MUS group; between-group differences were not statistically significant. Subgroup analysis by stress urinary incontinence (SUI) severity revealed consistently high dryness rates across mild, moderate, and severe categories, without significant intergroup differences.

Conclusions: Intraurethral CLHA/Dx injection achieved clinical outcomes comparable to MUS, offering a less invasive alternative for SUI treatment.

交联透明质酸/右旋氨基甲酸酯(DEXSUI®)经尿道注射与中尿道悬吊治疗压力性尿失禁:短期比较结果分析
目的:压力性尿失禁(SUI)是一种影响生活质量的常见疾病;虽然中尿道悬吊(MUS)手术是标准的治疗方法,但尿道内填充注射提供了一种微创的选择。本研究旨在比较经尿道交联透明质酸/右转异体(CLHA/Dx, DEXSUI®)注射与尿道中悬吊手术治疗女性应激性尿失禁的疗效和安全性。方法:回顾性研究对象为2024年1月至2025年6月期间在İzmir Bakırçay大学、Çiğli培训与研究医院就诊的压力性尿失禁女性。患者接受尿道中吊带手术或经尿道注射CLHA/Dx (DEXSUI®)。排除标准包括急迫性尿失禁、尿路感染和BMI低于35 kg/m²。生活质量采用国际尿失禁简易问卷(ICIQ-SF)、泌尿生殖窘迫问卷-6 (UDI-6)和尿失禁生活质量问卷(I-QOL)进行评估。治疗成功由患者整体改善印象(PGI)-I评分来定义。结果:尿道中悬吊术(MUS)与手术时间(30.5±7.8分钟vs 11.4±4.3分钟,p < 0.001)和住院时间(1天vs 0天,p < 0.001)显著相关。在1个月的随访中,完全干燥率相似(82.4%比79.4%,p = 0.76)。两组患者ICIQ-SF、UDI-6和尿失禁生活质量问卷(I-QOL)评分较基线均有显著改善(均p < 0.05),其中MUS组改善略大;组间差异无统计学意义。压力性尿失禁(SUI)严重程度的亚组分析显示,在轻度、中度和重度类别中,干燥率始终较高,组间差异不显著。结论:经尿道注射CLHA/Dx取得了与MUS相当的临床结果,为SUI治疗提供了一种侵入性较小的选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书